@MintLynx yeah, I have the same problem with my Actias a lot. It’s basically indestructible by any normal means, but can be “disabled” in game if the cockpit block gets detached by an explosion, rendering the entire thing inoperable. Kinda stupid how that works, but I guess it makes sense for smaller crafts lol
@goboygo1 indeed, I kinda explained that a bit on my P-31U post if I remember correctly, someone in the comments told me to turn it into a fighter lol. Unfortunately weapons don’t exactly like water for whatever reason in SP, so I probably wouldn’t be able to do much about that. Anywho idk why I mentioned that but yeah it’s just a cool concept that could be potentially interesting
I give an upvote for how hilarious that bridge destruction was, for I personally have never seen the bridge be destroyed in such a violent manner lmao. I also notice that you’re using a screen recorder, rather than just videotaping the gameplay with your phone, which as you’ve hopefully realized, greatly improves the video quality!
@goboygo1 I propose a corrosion-resistant layer of material as a the outside skin of the aircraft, and all other facilities on the aircraft that are exposed. Of course, an entirely new aircraft could be crafted for such an endeavor, rather than just applying it to an already-existing aircraft like the F-22 in my shoddy example.
@rexzion that too. But I think the community as a whole has just agreed that you’re the toxic one and it’s impossible to tell when you’re being serious or not, so we all just take it as a joke. You’re like the one kid in school who makes really offensive jokes, but everyone is ok with it because they know you’re just joking and you’re actually a really nice guy
Cool looking car, the paneling is a little rough here and there, slightly part inefficient. The skull hood ornament on front is nice looking, but the handling of the car could be better. It’s also very large, making it a little unorthodox to handle. Regardless, it’s nice work, and I hope you take my advice as constructive criticism, rather than me being a prick.
@asteroidbook345 I mean he already made the forum earlier and not only is this formatted the exact same way, even with the XML joke at the beginning, with the dragScale gag and the massScale gag, but it also has the same title too. Kinda the same situation with the “can you name them all” clogging the forums atm. It was fine with one post, cool in fact. But when 30 more are added to the forums, it gets repetitive and becomes a nuisance. And we don’t need the same thing happening with this forum post.
For when you really need to penetrate the enemy forces ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
cursed
@AndrewGarrison the almighty has spoken
+1Sadboye12 was one of my favorite builders here, their creations are some of the most beautiful works I’ve ever had the privilege to lay my eyes upon.
Farewell friend, Godspeed.
+4Radial Engines are mesmerizing to watch, great work here!
+4Japanese FW-190 with contra-rotating prop
+1@Vincent ah
This is the only game in the world where you can do this, never change SimplePlanes, never change.
+9When they feature Savage’s Concord for like half the video but they give the Blackhawk like 10 seconds of video time
+1sad MRZA noises
Lands like a SpaceX Rocket, awesome!
+1Broken enough to the point where an image of a dodgeball with a bouncing sound in the background is enough to make me laugh
+1@MintLynx yeah, I have the same problem with my Actias a lot. It’s basically indestructible by any normal means, but can be “disabled” in game if the cockpit block gets detached by an explosion, rendering the entire thing inoperable. Kinda stupid how that works, but I guess it makes sense for smaller crafts lol
@goboygo1 indeed, I kinda explained that a bit on my P-31U post if I remember correctly, someone in the comments told me to turn it into a fighter lol. Unfortunately weapons don’t exactly like water for whatever reason in SP, so I probably wouldn’t be able to do much about that. Anywho idk why I mentioned that but yeah it’s just a cool concept that could be potentially interesting
This is souper good
ˢᵒʳʳʸ
SP Builds with realistic damage models always surprise me.
+3Wingspan?
I did this with my Screamer Powerboat, it makes a world of difference not using a gyro, much more realistic in terms of buoyancy physics.
+2Y’know I'm gonna be real here, I have no idea what I’m looking at. But damn it’s awesome
+1”Trigger! On your six, incoming Ace Combat references, break break break!”
+5Since we’re all commenting song lyrics...
“Who’s in the shadows...”
“Who’s ready to play?”
“Are we the hunters...”
“Or are we the prey?”
BUM BUM BUM
”There’s no surrender,””And there’s no escape.”“Are we the hunters...”
“Or are we the
prey?””This is no normal, Game of Survival.”credit to MONXX lol
+4Cockpit is pretty cool, but the plane lacks in detail. Also leads me to believe that someone else other than you made the cockpit
I give an upvote for how hilarious that bridge destruction was, for I personally have never seen the bridge be destroyed in such a violent manner lmao. I also notice that you’re using a screen recorder, rather than just videotaping the gameplay with your phone, which as you’ve hopefully realized, greatly improves the video quality!
@MulletMan001 I basically just clipped a whole lot of engines on top of each other, and hid them all inside the plane where they won’t be seen.
I guess he’s making this thing wither we like it or not
+4wheeeeeze
@goboygo1 I propose a corrosion-resistant layer of material as a the outside skin of the aircraft, and all other facilities on the aircraft that are exposed. Of course, an entirely new aircraft could be crafted for such an endeavor, rather than just applying it to an already-existing aircraft like the F-22 in my shoddy example.
aria
@FoxDynamicsWeapons hey baby come home to my place and I’ll show you my “javelin missile”
+1Congarts
+1slaps Javelin Missile
+1“This ba-“
f*cking explodesLove a good WWI plane, beautifully box-shaped!
+1Concords with Miniguns; for when you need to transport passengers at 5:00 but have to fight MiG-25’s at 6:00
+1@TheLateJBerry that was beautiful
+2@LittleJerry
YOU WILL DIE IN:
+10:05@PersonOfTheUniverse9YT because I can.
@EliCandyYT69 well, awesome is a generous way to describe my account. Also my username is dumb lol
Certified forum moment
@Thunderhawk man everyone’s saying that this could be a trailer for the game lol, I didn’t realize how controversial this would get
+272 in a 55, take ‘em out!
Fox-2 Fox-2!
@JuanNotAnAlt And thanks friend, see you again.
+1Nice BC-17 Tsunami turret lol
Jokes aside, very nice replica, it handles greatly and looks awesome!
This time I uploaded it at 4:00 AM are you proud of me
cause I’m not
Dude. Invest in a screen recorder.
@rexzion that too. But I think the community as a whole has just agreed that you’re the toxic one and it’s impossible to tell when you’re being serious or not, so we all just take it as a joke. You’re like the one kid in school who makes really offensive jokes, but everyone is ok with it because they know you’re just joking and you’re actually a really nice guy
+2@KfcGaming well I just checked, can confirm I’m not a moderator. (thankfully)
Cool looking car, the paneling is a little rough here and there, slightly part inefficient. The skull hood ornament on front is nice looking, but the handling of the car could be better. It’s also very large, making it a little unorthodox to handle. Regardless, it’s nice work, and I hope you take my advice as constructive criticism, rather than me being a prick.
+3Rexzion is just good at being consecutively funny
+1@asteroidbook345 I mean he already made the forum earlier and not only is this formatted the exact same way, even with the XML joke at the beginning, with the dragScale gag and the massScale gag, but it also has the same title too. Kinda the same situation with the “can you name them all” clogging the forums atm. It was fine with one post, cool in fact. But when 30 more are added to the forums, it gets repetitive and becomes a nuisance. And we don’t need the same thing happening with this forum post.
+3@BombBoi1822 Wright Flyer, manually driven edition
Albeit yet another interesting aircraft story, a complete knockoff of BogdanX’s earlier post.
@Ryancooper2112 it’s not a mod, it’s vanilla SP, which is internet lingo for default.