@daniboi99 use this aircraft. Start at Wright island and turn so that your heading is 0. Set the game to fast forward and use AG4 to put the Droplet in turbo mode. Throttle up and wait about 20 seconds and you will be at snowstone.
@32 the post. There's an old game where you can put a hamster in a microwave. It's called something like Mad Manshion, but I can't remember.
Edit: whoops replied to myself
So I think I'll explain how this works for somebody who might be wondering. So first of all, this is only three parts: a 1000 blade propeller, a base, and a cockpit. The only functional thing on here is a propeller. The funky trees code is just a line that makes the rotor pitch go back and forth, and this is where the movement of the illusion comes from.
You may be familiar with the xml attribute chordScale, this increases the distance from the leading edge to the trailing edge of the blade, which at small numbers simply means it makes the propeller blades wider. On this thing though, the chord scale is turned up insanely high, which does some really trippy stuff even if you have a prop with only a few blades. In addition, the blade thickness is turned way up which certainly makes it look even stranger. (edit: chord scale is jsut the xml value for thickness, I didn't notice that)
So in conclusion, this utilizes some really strange and buggy stuff in the game to create a really interesting illusion, which is probably what you thought was going on the whole time lol
So fair warning, my FT skills are a bit basic, and I'm sure there's a more efficient way to do this, but my method worked during my testing.
You can create a variable and call it something so you can remember what it does. Maybe something like rotatorControl or something like that. Set its expression to rotatorControl+[INPUT] with the input being whatever input you want your oars to be. What this does is say that rotatorControl will stay at the same value unless you add to it via your input. Then you can set the input to your oar to rotatorControl and it should work. The only problem here is that it probably won't stop immediately. You can change that by dividing the input by something that works for you. I think dividing it by 90 should work.
I know funky trees can be confusing, so if this didn't make any sense, I made a little proof of concept you can find here . If you have any questions let me know, I know I probably could have done a better job explaining that.
@Transair56 I have messed around with airliners and as it turns out I just suck at making them lol
They're a lot of parts and no matter what airliner I make, someone has made a better version of it than me.
This is only gonna give you a max of 2 notifications.
One will say "You have seventeen quintillion comments on your post"
The other will say "You have 3 upvotes on your post"
I've deleted about 15 of my own, mostly forums and a few planes that were related. I think 2 of mine have gotten removed by the mods, one was because of encouraging ppl to upvote stuff, the other one was because I didn't make any changes to something (it was a weird scenario).
Also several comments, all of them were just me trying to defuse an argument as opposed to reporting it. Not sure if this counts as it was more the whole conversation that I happened to be part of got removed.
what idek what's happening here.
Bronze is 100,
Silver is 1000,
Gold is 5000,
and Platinum is 25,000.
(I think it's technically 1 point over that but I'm not 100% sure, and for practical purposes it's exactly the same)
Alrighty I like this thing. From the perspective of looks, you couldn't really ask for too much more realism without a pretty high part count. It handles really, really well. My gold prix time was 1:03 on my first attempt, and I could almost certainly hit sub 1 minute if I really tried. (Edit: I managed to get 52 seconds.) While the performance is really good, it is not terribly realistic. I never had to brake and rarely had to let off the gas, meaning I took pretty much every curve at 200 mph. Also, the 0-60 speed is like 1.5 seconds, which I won't dock points for but is worth noting.
Overall, performance is a solid 10/10 as it has clearly been well tuned and quite a bit of time has been spent on it. Unfortunately, realism did not rank as high, earning only a 5/10 due to handling.
Overall, this build got a 15/20, a solid entry by any means.
Outside of the criteria of this challenge, this is a phenomenal build that I really like.
Good work and good luck as more entries come in.
@All i figure I'll probably rate it pretty soon then the average will be the overall score if that works for you.
Also keep in mind the main judging categories are just performance and realism
Where is this video clip from? Looks like some Ace Combat thingy other than that I can't think of any realistic reason for that to work as a cut scene. If it's real, they're breaking like 9500 safety codes lol
I think the sky is set to sometime in 2009 but I could be totally wrong
+1Edit: no it's june 15th, 2000
@daniboi99 use this aircraft. Start at Wright island and turn so that your heading is 0. Set the game to fast forward and use AG4 to put the Droplet in turbo mode. Throttle up and wait about 20 seconds and you will be at snowstone.
@Hehehehehehehehehehhehehe oh that's it. Thanks, that was driving me crazy lol
+2@32 the post. There's an old game where you can put a hamster in a microwave. It's called something like Mad Manshion, but I can't remember.
+1Edit: whoops replied to myself
@FalHartIndustries the part where she launches chaff + some random headline lol
+1@Atrocitum oh that's interesting. I gotta say I'm interested to see how that turns out.
why the heck does that civilian plane have chaff lol
+1like, who do they think they are, Fed-Ex?
@DDVC yeah that's probably way better than what I said
+1@Atrocitum nah that's ok, you could also probably just pin the comment if you want
@Pan daily uploads does that lol
+1this is a reference to some really old point-and-click video game I've forgotten the name of.
+1Is it Mad Mansion?
This is driving me crazy
So I think I'll explain how this works for somebody who might be wondering. So first of all, this is only three parts: a 1000 blade propeller, a base, and a cockpit. The only functional thing on here is a propeller. The funky trees code is just a line that makes the rotor pitch go back and forth, and this is where the movement of the illusion comes from.
+1You may be familiar with the xml attribute
chordScale, this increases the distance from the leading edge to the trailing edge of the blade, which at small numbers simply means it makes the propeller blades wider. On this thing though, the chord scale is turned up insanely high, which does some really trippy stuff even if you have a prop with only a few blades. In addition, the blade thickness is turned way up which certainly makes it look even stranger. (edit: chord scale is jsut the xml value for thickness, I didn't notice that)So in conclusion, this utilizes some really strange and buggy stuff in the game to create a really interesting illusion, which is probably what you thought was going on the whole time lol
Hmm. Might be worth investigating to see if this glitch can be replicated consistently. Could open up quite a few possibilities.
That F-89's livery is absolutely beautiful.
+1@V oh no it would only be a few thousand at the most. I'm not going to try and top the Yamato...
Yet.
So fair warning, my FT skills are a bit basic, and I'm sure there's a more efficient way to do this, but my method worked during my testing.
You can create a variable and call it something so you can remember what it does. Maybe something like
rotatorControlor something like that. Set its expression torotatorControl+[INPUT]with the input being whatever input you want your oars to be. What this does is say that rotatorControl will stay at the same value unless you add to it via your input. Then you can set the input to your oar torotatorControland it should work. The only problem here is that it probably won't stop immediately. You can change that by dividing the input by something that works for you. I think dividing it by 90 should work.I know funky trees can be confusing, so if this didn't make any sense, I made a little proof of concept you can find here . If you have any questions let me know, I know I probably could have done a better job explaining that.
@Gahaka it's out already, you're welcome to check it out!
You could probably just google the real size then if you uncheck “scale selected part only” you can scale the whole plane easily.
Are they all unique or is it possible for there to be identical ones?
+1Ohhh that's crazy
+1interesting.
the wifi signal bar doohickey just tells you how good your connection to your router is, not how good the wifi itself is. It might just suck lol
@Transair56 I have messed around with airliners and as it turns out I just suck at making them lol
They're a lot of parts and no matter what airliner I make, someone has made a better version of it than me.
Did somebody say 4Runner?!?!??!??!?!??!??!??!?!
lol just kidding dont block me plz
@Eggplant oh that thing is atrocious lol
@SILVERPANZER I suspected that would be your vote lol
@ToeTips that's the truth, you worked with me on the 4Runner so you know what I'm talking about lol
+1Those look really good for ios screenshots. I fs thought they were reshaded lol
This is only gonna give you a max of 2 notifications.
One will say "You have seventeen quintillion comments on your post"
The other will say "You have 3 upvotes on your post"
yea sorry I couldn't get your screenshots to ya in time, looks like KSB24 did a great job though
That's sick
@intruder72 nah buy a new laptop
+2Remember, we are not defined by our hardships, but by the way we overcome!
Least discouraging thing I can think of
+1No way
T
@LunchBox That is good reasoning, after all it does feel good to drive, so although it's not realistic it is still quite good.
+1Spoilers Please
And tag @ToeTips on them lol
@plibby1221 bruh what did I say
+5Other than inform you that there is no tanker tag lol
I've deleted about 15 of my own, mostly forums and a few planes that were related. I think 2 of mine have gotten removed by the mods, one was because of encouraging ppl to upvote stuff, the other one was because I didn't make any changes to something (it was a weird scenario).
Also several comments, all of them were just me trying to defuse an argument as opposed to reporting it. Not sure if this counts as it was more the whole conversation that I happened to be part of got removed.
No
+1@All yeah?
what idek what's happening here.
+3Bronze is 100,
Silver is 1000,
Gold is 5000,
and Platinum is 25,000.
(I think it's technically 1 point over that but I'm not 100% sure, and for practical purposes it's exactly the same)
Out of mine and @All's judging, this adds up to a 23/30. Good work!
Alrighty I like this thing. From the perspective of looks, you couldn't really ask for too much more realism without a pretty high part count. It handles really, really well. My gold prix time was 1:03 on my first attempt, and I could almost certainly hit sub 1 minute if I really tried. (Edit: I managed to get 52 seconds.) While the performance is really good, it is not terribly realistic. I never had to brake and rarely had to let off the gas, meaning I took pretty much every curve at 200 mph. Also, the 0-60 speed is like 1.5 seconds, which I won't dock points for but is worth noting.
Overall, performance is a solid 10/10 as it has clearly been well tuned and quite a bit of time has been spent on it. Unfortunately, realism did not rank as high, earning only a 5/10 due to handling.
Overall, this build got a 15/20, a solid entry by any means.
Outside of the criteria of this challenge, this is a phenomenal build that I really like.
Good work and good luck as more entries come in.
@DatMaluchGuy19 nice! I'm first on the list!
it probably is possible but it takes some funky trees stuff I'm not smart enough to pull off.
@SpamtonGSpamton ah
I think it can happen automatically if ppl spam report it, if you didn't have anything offensive in there you might ask the mods to put it back
@SpamtonGSpamton nice but what exactly is the tag for
@All i figure I'll probably rate it pretty soon then the average will be the overall score if that works for you.
Also keep in mind the main judging categories are just performance and realism
Where is this video clip from? Looks like some Ace Combat thingy other than that I can't think of any realistic reason for that to work as a cut scene. If it's real, they're breaking like 9500 safety codes lol
Very good!
+1