@Spectre2520 Yeah, I like it a lot as well, though it's hard for me to pick one favourite. I love 'em all.

In my opinion, this is the best one out of all your plane

https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/xI77u8/Painted-Longsword-by-SledDriver
CIO : check it out
@SledDriver

@Spectre2520 sure, just don't bypass the successor system (keep the existing cockpit).

Can I add colors to it and re-post it in my account? I will give your credit. Also where did the name “SledDriver” come from? @SledDriver

@FlyingFish1 PS, it's "cite," not "sight" in this context :)

@FlyingFish1 Well, I appreciate the mention, but the way you're supposed to do it is to keep the cockpit from the original plane, so that the successor system can work. For instance, if you look at this build, note the "Auto credit" above the description.

@SledDriver im sorry I didn’t sight your original design. I made it better and I sighted your original design. Keep on making those awesome designs! https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/wzWUu4/FF-47-Tetra

@ForeverPie Oh look, another luddite. "Manual labor good! Brain work bad!" Hilariously pathetic. Have a nice life :)

@SledDriver @jamesPLANESii

I've had SledDriver on my radar for a while for cheating SimplePlanes.

"Cheating" as in using computer codes to do stuff for him with no effort put in on his end.

Have a nice day :D

Alright then. @SledDriver

@jamesPLANESii no, thanks.

Like, just describing the issues with them.

Like, I mean, doing it seriously. Not just accusing them of being bad. @SledDriver

Would you like me to criticise your planes to what I really think of them? (It may be helpful.) @SledDriver

@jamesPLANESii "Have a nice day," when used in this manner, means "I'm no longer interested in talking to you, please go away."

Why have just a cherry when you can have a whole dessert?@SledDriver

@jamesPLANESii Getting upset in an argument is a sure sign that deep down, you know you're losing.

Again, not interested in your challenge, or your fallacious arguments. You enjoy doing things the dumb, primitive, laborious way? Good on you. I prefer working the smart way. Now be on your way, do your thing, and don't presume to tell people what to do or how to do it. (I have the right to say this because you started this.)

Have a nice day.

Actually, I’ll change the challenge. Try and build something actually decent that’s built without a single ounce of code. All built in the designer. @SledDriver

Well, to me, the point is not all the upvotes you get at the end. It’s the building experience. I’d rather waste my life doing what I love than getting attention and being admired by people. You probably wouldn’t know, since you probably haven’t spent hours building anything in months. Building is the bit I get the most joy out of. Making things look realistic. Making fictional stuff look real. Building stuff to looks as though it’s been literally sent from real life into the game, but actually you’ve built it yourself. The upvotes is just a thing at the end to see how well you did.
Building a replica isn’t like forging a painting. The way people forge paintings is they look at another painting and make their own version and call it their own. The way you’d do that on SP is you’d be looking at another person’s design and copying it part for part. The way replicas work is you look at pictures and build the plane. The equivalent of that with a painting would be a person goes to the same place as the original artist to draw his picture, which (say) is a landscape. See, it’s a lot different.
Getting the upvotes isn’t the whole story. In fact, it’s just the cherry on the top. The building is the main thing, as well is the dessert of the dessert.

@jamesPLANESii Likewise.

Uhh.... I feel you’ve completely missed the point of SP... @SledDriver

@jamesPLANESii

• I don't know about you, but I have limited time in this world, and I'd rather spend it creating new things than copying what others have already done. There's nothing creative about replicas. It's drudge work. What you're spending days or weeks building could be done by a computer in seconds, if not milliseconds, and done better (perfectly) at that.
• Again, because I have limited time, I like to spend it efficiently. SP is not a game that makes it efficient to create replicas.
• Why do people pay millions for paintings, but not for photos (not even for those taken by multimillion-dollar cameras like Hubble)? Because the whole point of art is to see the world through the eyes of the artist. To see something new.
• Why did Rembrandt spend his time creating original masterpieces, instead of spraying graffiti all over the place, or using stencils to spray-paint the same thing over and over again? (I'm not saying I'm Rembrandt, I'm making a point about creativity.)
• Why is a forgery, even if perfect, not considered anywhere near as valuable as the original work of art? A replica is just an honest forgery.

I'm not trying to rain on anyone's parade here. If you enjoy making replicas, more power to you. But don't act like it's the holy grail of a building game.

Er... ok... @SledDriver

@jamesPLANESii I'll answer that if you promise not to accuse me of trying to make you feel dumb/harassing you/bullying you.