Upvote if you want it back!
Please Andrew, bring back this with some modification:
Size 2x2x2
Protuding engine elimination
XML parameter modificable as the new ones (propeller blades diameter, number, scalable power)
Base power about 1.7 the present one
Limit speed at 760 MPh like the new ones
The rear part corner modificable (round, curved, smoot, hard)
4 colours:
Main - principal body
Trim1 - porpeller
Trim2 - engine
Trim3 - nose trim (the red part in the image)
And please, leave this beautifull engine sound as it is! :D Is perfect for this.
(This is posted already modded as power and size for all user that want to save it as sub-assembly)
Specifications
Spotlights
- RailfanEthan 5.8 years ago
- Chancey21 5.8 years ago
General Characteristics
- Created On Windows
- Wingspan 4.2ft (1.3m)
- Length 12.8ft (3.9m)
- Height 6.6ft (2.0m)
- Empty Weight 1,114lbs (505kg)
- Loaded Weight 1,114lbs (505kg)
Performance
- Power/Weight Ratio 2.017
- Wing Loading N/A
- Wing Area 0.0ft2 (0.0m2)
- Drag Points 1120
Parts
- Number of Parts 3
- Control Surfaces 0
- Performance Cost 10
@Baldovino thanks 😊
@Ntgblast76 tag me in the post, I want to see the result. :P
@Ntgblast76 Sure, I'm happy if you use it.
Baldovino is it alright if I use this for one of my creations if so thank you I hope people will like it
easy detail with just 1 part and it fits on biplanes with exposed front engine quite nicely. @ColonelStriker
@BigBoiPlanes thanks 😊
I can finally up vote your post!
I don’t see why we should bring this back. But that is me.
.
The T1000 and T2000 performs better than this. Plus, the fuselage blocks could make detailing jobs better than this. Especially with the recent fine adjustments being available for the mobile version. This would only take space that the SP needs.
.
UNLESS, this has a more awesome sound than the two. If that’s true, add it without question
@Baldovino Okay，I got it
@flyingsteve88 The question is... why not, expecially with the suggested mods?
We can do things like this: https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/n826eX/Spad-VII-Replica-2018
why are you want it ?
@grantflys Not with the modificatio I sugested... the moddable corners and the prop diameter/blade number are needed to be really used. :)
Your engine is already in the game.
@PhantomBladeCorp
Actually I understood very well. Mine was "irony" (do you know what it is?)
I was wondering why you had not done one of these two things, if the creation in your opinion was inappropriate: Report it as such (which would have been perfect, since it would have made it appear right under the nose of Andrew Garrison) or ignored completely if not You were in agreement with the chosen method.
And give an eye to my creations, and wonder if I need the few points of this... especially as already platinum.
@Baldovino Thanks for misinterpreting my words.
I didn't say "I don't want old propellers back." I only stated that you've made this post just to beg for points.
Had it been a forum post, I'd have no problem with it.
@ballisticbullets Just tried. :( The idea is beautifull, but sadly the T1000 sound is at least 10 times louder, and cancell any other old prop. I tried to put it directly under the cockpit, to hear the sound at least in first person view, but... no way. :( But good attempt.
@PhantomBladeCorp OK, we understand you dont want the modified old prop back.
Shameless points begging.
@RussianAS People like my idea and want the old engine back.
38 upvotes?!
I like to put one of these in WWII craft, with power at zero, just for sound. like, hide it in the fuselage.
Nostalgic
@PanKlex204 Me too, but with the modification I suggested in the post it will be a must...
I still have this in my sub assemblies. :D
@BigBoiPlanes @DerekSP thanks anyway. :D