Bring back the old prop, please!

by   34.7k Baldovino  2 months ago
472 downloads

Upvote if you want it back!

Please Andrew, bring back this with some modification:

Size 2x2x2
Protuding engine elimination
XML parameter modificable as the new ones (propeller blades diameter, number, scalable power)
Base power about 1.7 the present one
Limit speed at 760 MPh like the new ones
The rear part corner modificable (round, curved, smoot, hard)

4 colours:

Main - principal body
Trim1 - porpeller
Trim2 - engine
Trim3 - nose trim (the red part in the image)

And please, leave this beautifull engine sound as it is! :D Is perfect for this.

EXAMPLE

(This is posted already modded as power and size for all user that want to save it as sub-assembly)

Spotlights

General Characteristics

  • Created On Windows
  • Wingspan 4.2ft (1.3m)
  • Length 12.8ft (3.9m)
  • Height 6.6ft (2.0m)
  • Empty Weight 1,114lbs (505kg)
  • Loaded Weight 1,114lbs (505kg)

Performance

  • Power/Weight Ratio 2.017
  • Wing Loading -439,839.3lbs/ft2 (-2,147,483.6kg/m2)
  • Wing Area 0.0ft2 (0.0m2)
  • Drag Points 1120

Parts

  • Number of Parts 3
  • Control Surfaces 0
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image

    @Baldovino thanks 😊

    one month ago
  • Profile image
    34.7k Baldovino

    @Ntgblast76 tag me in the post, I want to see the result. :P

    one month ago
  • Profile image
    34.7k Baldovino

    @Ntgblast76 Sure, I'm happy if you use it.

    one month ago
  • Profile image

    Baldovino is it alright if I use this for one of my creations if so thank you I hope people will like it

    one month ago
  • Profile image
    2,588 AnoniMosu

    easy detail with just 1 part and it fits on biplanes with exposed front engine quite nicely. @ColonelStriker

    2 months ago
  • Profile image
    34.7k Baldovino

    @BigBoiPlanes thanks 😊

    2 months ago
  • Profile image

    I can finally up vote your post!

    2 months ago
  • Profile image

    I don’t see why we should bring this back. But that is me.
    .
    The T1000 and T2000 performs better than this. Plus, the fuselage blocks could make detailing jobs better than this. Especially with the recent fine adjustments being available for the mobile version. This would only take space that the SP needs.
    .
    UNLESS, this has a more awesome sound than the two. If that’s true, add it without question

    2 months ago
  • Profile image
    639 Mrjace22

    The old engine had to go for better much powerfull engine that can do better than an old beat down engine. Just accept the new engines.

    2 months ago
  • Profile image

    @Baldovino Okay,I got it

    2 months ago
  • Profile image
    34.7k Baldovino

    @flyingsteve88 The question is... why not, expecially with the suggested mods?

    We can do things like this: https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/n826eX/Spad-VII-Replica-2018

    2 months ago
  • Profile image

    why are you want it ?

    2 months ago
  • Profile image
    34.7k Baldovino

    @grantflys Not with the modificatio I sugested... the moddable corners and the prop diameter/blade number are needed to be really used. :)

    2 months ago
  • Profile image
    7,653 grantflys

    Your engine is already in the game.

    2 months ago
  • Profile image
    34.7k Baldovino

    @PhantomBladeCorp

    Actually I understood very well. Mine was "irony" (do you know what it is?)

    I was wondering why you had not done one of these two things, if the creation in your opinion was inappropriate: Report it as such (which would have been perfect, since it would have made it appear right under the nose of Andrew Garrison) or ignored completely if not You were in agreement with the chosen method.

    And give an eye to my creations, and wonder if I need the few points of this... especially as already platinum.

    2 months ago
  • Profile image

    @Baldovino Thanks for misinterpreting my words.
    I didn't say "I don't want old propellers back." I only stated that you've made this post just to beg for points.
    Had it been a forum post, I'd have no problem with it.

    2 months ago
  • Profile image
    34.7k Baldovino

    @ballisticbullets Just tried. :( The idea is beautifull, but sadly the T1000 sound is at least 10 times louder, and cancell any other old prop. I tried to put it directly under the cockpit, to hear the sound at least in first person view, but... no way. :( But good attempt.

    2 months ago
  • Profile image
    34.7k Baldovino

    @PhantomBladeCorp OK, we understand you dont want the modified old prop back.

    2 months ago
  • Profile image

    Shameless points begging.

    +1 2 months ago
  • Profile image
    34.7k Baldovino

    @RussianAS People like my idea and want the old engine back.

    2 months ago
  • Profile image
    55.3k RussianAS

    38 upvotes?!

    2 months ago
  • Profile image

    I like to put one of these in WWII craft, with power at zero, just for sound. like, hide it in the fuselage.

    2 months ago
  • Profile image
    8,248 arcues

    Nostalgic

    2 months ago
  • Profile image
    34.7k Baldovino

    @PanKlex204 Me too, but with the modification I suggested in the post it will be a must...

    2 months ago
  • Profile image

    I still have this in my sub assemblies. :D

    2 months ago
  • Log in to see more comments