Profile image

Nanchang Q-5D Fantan

3,823 TheFlyingWolfYT  1.5 years ago
1,720 downloads
Auto Credit Based on AquaViT's A-5C

WIKI

The Nanchang Q-5 (Chinese: ?-5; pinyin: Qiang-5; NATO reporting name: Fantan), also known as the A-5 in its export versions, is a Chinese-built single-seat, twin jet engine ground-attack aircraft based on the Shenyang J-6. The aircraft is primarily used for close air support.

The PRC was an enthusiastic user of the MiG-19, which it manufactured locally as the Shenyang J-6 from 1958. In August 1958, the People's Liberation Army requested development of a jet attack aircraft for the air support role.

Lu Xiaopeng was appointed chief designer of this project. Lu also designed the J-12 fighter jet. Although based on the MiG-19, the new design, designated Qiangjiji-5, had a longer fuselage, area ruled to reduce transonic drag and accommodate a 4 m (13-ft) long internal weapons bay. The air intakes were moved to the fuselage sides to make space in the nose for a planned target radar (which was never actually fitted). New wings with greater area and reduced sweep were incorporated. The Q-5 shares the J-6's Liming Wopen WP-6 A (Tumansky RD-9) turbojet engines. The redesign cost some high-altitude speed, but the Q-5 is as fast as the MiG-19/J-6 at low level, thanks largely to the area-ruled fuselage.

Fixed armament of the Q-5 was reduced to two Type 23-1 23 mm cannon with 100 rounds per gun, mounted in the wing roots. Two pylons under each wing and two pairs of tandem pylons under the engines were provided in addition to the weapons bay. A total of 1,000 kg (2,205 lb) of ordnance could be carried internally, with an additional 1,000 kg externally. On many aircraft the weapons bay is now used primarily for an auxiliary fuel tank.

Production drawings were completed in 1960 allowing construction of prototypes to begin, but the political climate in China resulted in the project being canceled in 1961. A small team kept the program alive until it work restarted in earnest at Nanchang. The first flight finally occurred on 10 June 1965. Series production began in 1969, with squadron delivery starting in 1970.

About 1,000 aircraft were produced, 600 of them being the updated Q-5A. A small number, perhaps a few dozen, Q-5As were modified to carry nuclear weapons; these are believed to retain their internal weapons bay. A long-range Q-5I, introduced in 1983, added a fuel tank instead of the internal weapons bay, compensating for that with the provision of two additional underwing pylons. Some of these aircraft serve with the PLA Navy, and have apparently been equipped with radar to guide anti-ship missiles. Subsequent minor upgrades include the Q-5IA, with a new gun/bomb sighting system and avionics, and the Q-5II, with radar warning receiver (RWR).

In the 1980s, the aircraft was exported to nations such as Pakistan, Bangladesh, Myanmar, and is often known as the A-5 in those nations.

Plans for an upgraded Q-5/A-5 with Western equipment and new navigation and attack systems were largely aborted following the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests and massacre, but the aircraft continues in service. It is a capable light attack aircraft, although its limited navigation and weapons-delivery systems are inferior to more modern aircraft.

In more recent years, the PLAAF has begun to field newer models of the Q-5, that incorporate some of the technology developed during the canceled Q-5M and Q-5K projects. The Q-5 introduces a nose-mounted laser rangefinder, and a laser designator is also likely to be fitted since the aircraft is said to be able to deliver laser-guided bombs. The Q-5A variant is believed to be capable of delivering nuclear munitions. The Q-5D is an upgrade with new avionics, including a HUD and a new navigation system. The Q-5E and Q-5F models are reportedly being worked on, though little is known about them at this time.[citation needed] One of them could potentially be the new two-seater that has been seen in a few photographs, although the two-seater could bear the designation Q-5J.

Current variant is Q-5D

ARMAMENT

2× Norinco Type 23-2K 23 mm (0.906 in) cannon, 150 rounds per gun
4x 500lb JDAM
8x 130mm APHE S-13 Rockets
12x Infrared countermeasures

2x 105 gallon drop tanks

ART DONE BY OTANA

Big thanks to AquaViT for helping me with the wobbly landing gears

The rocket pod used here is made by ManManTheWeaponsMan

Spotlights

General Characteristics

  • Predecessor A-5C
  • Created On Android
  • Wingspan 36.1ft (11.0m)
  • Length 63.3ft (19.3m)
  • Height 16.3ft (5.0m)
  • Empty Weight 11,027lbs (5,001kg)
  • Loaded Weight 15,492lbs (7,027kg)

Performance

  • Power/Weight Ratio 2.349
  • Wing Loading 50.3lbs/ft2 (245.5kg/m2)
  • Wing Area 308.1ft2 (28.6m2)
  • Drag Points 10022

Parts

  • Number of Parts 569
  • Control Surfaces 7
  • Performance Cost 2,342
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image
    377 Khanskaya

    @TheFlyingWolfYT the problem isnt that its a painting, its the fact that this paiting is the ONLY form of image we have to see the plane before we download and it doesnt really show us the ACTUAL build. thats the issue. it wouldnt be an issue if you had included actual screenshots along with the painting though

    1.2 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Holymissile e

    1.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    12.1k Holymissile

    @TheFlyingWolfYT So?

    1.4 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Holymissile it's digital art made by otana with an original screenshot taken by me used as the sketch background

    1.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    12.1k Holymissile

    @TheFlyingWolfYT The cover doesn't match the real thing.

    +4 1.5 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Holymissile ??

    +1 1.5 years ago
  • Profile image
    12.1k Holymissile

    Best Photoshop User.🤣😂🤣😂

    +4 1.5 years ago
  • Profile image

    @TheFlyingWolfYT That's ok! No credit needed

    +2 1.5 years ago
  • Profile image
    62.6k Otana

    @PaperPlaneHasDream Yes, my paintings can be somewhat misleading, but there is a lot of demand for them.

    I think screenshots should be used along with digital paintings.

    These two can be a good combination.

    +2 1.5 years ago
  • Profile image

    @ANNYUI that hurt...

    +1 1.5 years ago
  • Profile image

    @PaperPlaneHasDream bro this piece is done from scratch by otana

    +1 1.5 years ago
  • Profile image

    @397blin it's by @Otana

    +1 1.5 years ago
  • Profile image

    The thing is for this one, and a similar one by another user is that, (opinion follows) the painting is clear enough to depict, but not photorealistic enough to be used to deceive people. Of course, we don’t know the author’s intention, nor do I want to baselessly accuse anyone. I think an average user of the site would be capable to see the thumbnail as a painting or an artistic depiction, and understand it’s not a screenshot per se. Of course if this becomes a problem in the future, something would be put in to prevent it. However, for the time being I think we don’t need to assume people have ill intent, and we can let people have a bit of artistic freedom.

    @PaperPlaneHasDream

    +3 1.5 years ago
  • Profile image

    @BaconAircraft
    I wonder if the 'grey area' will shrink or disappear.
    Because, maybe it's a bit unwarranted, but I'm a worried that there will be a bunch of such works here that don't match their thumbnails.

    It's ok to take thumbnails with reshade and it's ok to photoshop the picture, but now we have seen many works that used "Digitally rendered picture of realistic airplane" as their thumbnails.And these works have, without exception, misled some players.

    +3 1.5 years ago
  • Profile image

    Eh, I think it’s in the grey area. @ANNYUI

    Though I don’t encourage this going forward. It could potentially be misleading, situation depends.

    +2 1.5 years ago
  • Profile image
    16.3k 397blin

    Good painting

    +2 1.5 years ago
  • Profile image
    180 ANNYUI

    @BaconAircraft @Vincent This thumbnail is a little inconsistent with the work itself.
    I don't know if this violate the rules.Just in case, let me ask you guys

    +2 1.5 years ago
  • Profile image

    @ManManTheWeaponsMan yes thank you!
    I forgot your user when uploading this aircraft... sorry for that!

    +1 1.5 years ago
  • Profile image

    @TheFlyingWolfYT I think my S-13 rocket pods look amazing on this plane. Well done!

    +1 1.5 years ago
  • Profile image

    @MarxismLeninismMaoism better than yours though...

    Sorry for the violence lol, I didn't mean it

    +1 1.5 years ago
  • Profile image
    29.5k xNotDumb

    @MarxismLeninismMaoism it isn't
    Get your eye test done

    +2 1.5 years ago
  • Profile image

    5爷!

    +1 1.5 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Timewolf thank you!

    +1 1.5 years ago
  • Profile image
    4,687 Timewolf

    looks smooth, nice and clean, amazing! You've done good job!

    +2 1.5 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Timewolf

    +1 1.5 years ago
  • Log in to see more comments