Profile image

Mitsubishi G6M1 "Ki"

120k asteroidbook345  3.9 years ago

Download this one if you don't want to die trying to land it.

E6M1 "Sekensha"



Act. 1 - Fold wings
Act. 2 - Start engines + cowling flaps
Act. 3 - Raise engines for STOL operation
Act. 4 - Arrestor hook
Act. 5 - lights
Act. 6 - release payload

The G6M1 "Ki" (Yellow) was a carrier-borne medium bomber (fictional) built in 1944 when the Japanese realized a carrierborne bomber could be very advantageous. Using the already tested engines from the A7M2, the G6M had a whopping 4400hp! It featured many innovative designs, such as the folding wings, and most importantly the hinged engines which allowed for carrier operations. It was essentially based off of the G3M with different engines, tip tanks, different avionics, and a new wing folding mechanism. You may be wondering why the defensive gunners have been eliminated. There’s a reason there are no carrierborne bombers. They’re heavy. To minimize weight, all defensive positions were lost to increase payload.









I can't land this thing on a runway without an arrestor hook for the life of me. For some reason, no matter what I do, it starts uncontrollably rocking back and forth, and then the wings get involved and I get screwed. It never blows up though...

Spotlights

General Characteristics

  • Created On Windows
  • Wingspan 80.0ft (24.4m)
  • Length 53.9ft (16.4m)
  • Height 15.8ft (4.8m)
  • Empty Weight 4,281lbs (1,941kg)
  • Loaded Weight 48,259lbs (21,890kg)

Performance

  • Horse Power/Weight Ratio 0.045
  • Wing Loading 53.2lbs/ft2 (259.8kg/m2)
  • Wing Area 906.9ft2 (84.3m2)
  • Drag Points 6700

Parts

  • Number of Parts 575
  • Control Surfaces 6
  • Performance Cost 2,582
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image
    140 Yeeturmom

    A successful landing to me is that the plane doesn’t explode.

    +1 3.2 years ago
  • Profile image

    Looks cool, flies rightfully stiff since it's kinda huge, like the gimmicks too, they're great!

    +1 3.7 years ago
  • Profile image
    50.7k Falkenwut

    @asteroidbook345 Not a problem

    3.8 years ago
  • Profile image

    @asteroidbook345 but I landed on the runway veered onto the grass my wing clipped the ground but didn’t ‘splode then drifted to face uss tiny

    3.8 years ago
  • Profile image

    I landed it

    3.8 years ago
  • Profile image

    I only have one complaint with this, the weels, they will turn in or out and make the plane flip onto its nose, does this happen for anybody else?

    3.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    665 Jerba

    Yea, I checked your page and saw it. @asteroidbook345

    3.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    665 Jerba

    Also, variant link does not work. Are you sure it’s correct/the variant is still there? I get a page that says this resource has been moved or removed.

    3.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    665 Jerba

    Cursed plane

    3.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    16.6k DarthAbhinav

    @asteroidbook345 No problems. Er, might I ask whether you're good at camos? I need help.

    3.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    152k MAHADI

    Ebic

    3.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    16.6k DarthAbhinav

    Great job, man. Well done.

    3.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    24.3k Mikan

    I would want to say this is sinful. but at the same time, genius.

    3.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    32.3k CRJ900Pilot

    Other than it, its an impressive build. Very smooth and clean design @asteroidbook345

    3.9 years ago
  • Profile image

    Lowish-part build? Dude my planes have even less parts lmao
    @asteroidbook345

    3.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    32.3k CRJ900Pilot

    Looks great! Realistically, however, visibility from the cockpit would be so bad that carrier landings would be impossible

    3.9 years ago
  • Profile image

    I have a lot of planes ready to post too, but I figured I can't post things too frequently, or they won't get too popular lol
    @asteroidbook345

    3.9 years ago
  • Profile image

    I mean, seems like your planes are getting more popular than my full-cockpit ones...

    3.9 years ago
  • Profile image

    How much time do you play this game daily?!

    3.9 years ago
  • Profile image

    Well right, I more mean instead of shifting the engines outward and widening the wing. I'm not insulting it or anything rest assured it's just an interesting design and i haven't seen a plane that utilizes it @asteroidbook345

    3.9 years ago
  • Profile image

    WOW

    3.9 years ago
  • Profile image

    This is awesome! I love the detail on it!

    3.9 years ago
  • Profile image

    This is pretty cool I gotta say, though I'm wondering: why are the engines pointed outward?

    3.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    13.9k ChrisPy

    @asteroidbook345 np this is very fun to fly!

    3.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    6,356 Aeromotive

    Thicc engines

    3.9 years ago
  • Log in to see more comments