Auto Credit Based on RamboJutter's Fairey P.75 3.8
Happy new year, happy new scheme. So if the Fairey design had been successful, there is a chance it would have been exported like the Canberra etc, here she is in the vietnam colour american colour scheme (Bob) =) Ag 1 for uc doors, Ag2 for bomb bay doors, Ag4 for lights, Ag5 for break chutes, Ag6 for go fast button, Ag7 for bang seats, Ag8 for vectored thrust (enabled on spawn). Inlayed airbrakes, i.e they have the infil pieces fixed to the wing and are flush finished, activated on brake button.
FranticMatty vid here
Specifications
Spotlights
- BaconAircraft 5.3 years ago
General Characteristics
- Predecessor Fairey P.75 3.8
- Created On Windows
- Wingspan 40.3ft (12.3m)
- Length 87.4ft (26.6m)
- Height 26.6ft (8.1m)
- Empty Weight 52,712lbs (23,909kg)
- Loaded Weight 60,583lbs (27,480kg)
Performance
- Power/Weight Ratio 3.338
- Wing Loading 23.7lbs/ft2 (115.7kg/m2)
- Wing Area 2,556.4ft2 (237.5m2)
- Drag Points 17426
Parts
- Number of Parts 986
- Control Surfaces 0
- Performance Cost 3,815
Looks like a B-58
@AWESOMENESS360 @BaconAircraft thanks guys.
Absolutely amazing...
yes but a B-52 is AMERICA@RamboJutter
@CptJacobson lol a b52 would have fallen out of the sky trying to keep up with this :)
nice plane lad shame it aint a B-52@RamboJutter
For some strange reason this takes forever to load into the world. I hVe 1500 part builds wich load twice as fast 🤔
@Tang0five yep, pretty much the entirety of the British aviation industry pre 60s would have had some boffins worth sharing a bar with, just think of the designs that never made it past the drawing board that we don't know about..
Fairey Aviation. So many greats rolled out their doors. I have a soft spot for Fairey (and all defunct British aerospace for that matter) and believe it or not Blackburn! I would like to have had a bitter or two with those boffins!
Very big work . The camouflage is very well done . Great job .
@DestinyAviation yeah if looked at doing that before, I like the concept but have to be very careful as too much mass causes the detacher to compress or extend during flight... I tried to have some jettisonable pusher props on a previous build but again detacher just didn't like that and caused a vibration which lead to destructive flutter.
@ChiChiWerx around 300 parts for just the camo, I used a similar technique to my canberra this time where I have over layered panels onto the base build (I have been trying to shape pieces to form the camo within the base model of late as it's neater, but I already had the base model for this). The crashing will be linked to the load time which has been extended due to some scaling which was done on the base build (whoops).
So...have to ask: how many parts are part of the base model and how many are the camo? Also, what technique did you use for your build? Build the base, then overlay, or what? Looks great either way...too bad it crashes my iPhone 8, which can handle almost 2,000 parts mos of the time.
That's a general definition of "mobile friendly"
@RamboJutter preferably no more than 450-500 for medium to high-end phones but usually somewhere around the 300 part range for low-end ones. Thats based on my experience with downloading aircraft and is based around Androids bc we can't run 800 part builds like iphone users (some can tho)
I think it would have been cool if you'd made it have an ejection system similar to the F-111, where the entire cockpit ejects from the plane. Great build!
@LancasterAce I'll have a think, what do you consider mobile friendly?
@BaconRoll Thanks, I aim to please :)
What a beautiful way to kick off the new year! Very nice plane, I don’t even care that I can’t download it tho lol
@LancasterAce was there a "please" missing there? :p. I don't have it on a mobile and thus far my experiments with "mobile friendly" builds hasn't been a success.