Auto Credit Based on nighthunter5674's F-100 PREDATOR (amphibious tank)
The A-100 Predator II is an A-class tank destroyer. It was orignially a tank in the first model known as the F-100 PREDATOR. But because of it's somewhat lower traction and absolutely no treads, it was demoted to a tank destroyer. It became a tank destroyer because of it's lethal fire power (that includes a bridge destroying gun). It mainly escorts Armored Troop Transports. AG-4 for driving. Roll controls for steering. AG-2 for bridge destroying gun. AG-7 for part boat. Activate all other groups for the best experience. Enjoy! Please upvote!
Specifications
Spotlights
- DimaKosheleFF 7.6 years ago
General Characteristics
- Predecessor F-100 PREDATOR (amphibious tank)
- Created On Windows
- Wingspan 32.1ft (9.8m)
- Length 72.6ft (22.1m)
- Height 16.9ft (5.2m)
- Empty Weight 123,567lbs (56,049kg)
- Loaded Weight 127,701lbs (57,924kg)
Performance
- Power/Weight Ratio 0.211
- Wing Loading 379,644.2lbs/ft2 (1,853,585.4kg/m2)
- Wing Area 0.3ft2 (0.0m2)
- Drag Points 23159
Parts
- Number of Parts 574
- Control Surfaces 0
- Performance Cost 2,869
@nighthunter5674 thnx!
@PyrusEnderhunter :D I love those guns))))
@nighthunter5674 Oh ok! Thank you! I also gave it a bridge killing gun.
@PyrusEnderhunter don't worry man))) it's ok))) i'm glad, that somebody had built a successor of my vehicle))) good luck man))))
@nighthunter5674 also, I may have found a flaw with ur design. When pressing all groups, the suspension on the right gear would glitch into the ground and make the tank go in circles.
@nighthunter5674 Soz if u wer offended that I used ur idea, I gave credit..
LOL!))) nice work man! nice work!
@MemeKingIndustriesAndMegaCorporation I am glad u concerend. But there is nothing to worry, I am making the A-24 Jaguar. Its gonna be more heavily armored. Plus most solid rounds cant penetrate my type of alloy anyways. The only thing that can is a heavily armed rail gun or a very big rock.
My original design had problems were the suspension would glitch through the ground and I would go in circles....
@Pilotmario it not a tank, it a tank DESTROYER. It was demoted because of it's somewhat weak traction. But armor is fine.
We do not use sloped armor on the sides because that will cut into the amount of internal space available. Also, the front is already well-sloped, and you should have the front armor to enemy anyways. @MemeKingIndustriesAndMegaCorporation
@Pilotmario sorry I meant to say hull. The turret has alot of sloping but the hull needs it. We can just fire at the side and it can pen easily. Since sides are always the weakest.
@MemeKingIndustriesAndMegaCorporation Not really. This has plenty of sloping. However, the front of the turret has a pretty big shot trap.
Oh crap you made this tank?! It looks pretty good to be honest. But it needs way more sloping on the hulk right @Pilotmario ?