Alright I’m getting bombarded

@SuperSix
Even if it is a missiles, it's going to be ungodly heavy.
The bore of this thing is 50mm less than the AGM-65 Maverick which weighs 210 to 304kg per missile.
Then the closest thing to this that fires conventional shells is the 240mm M1 Howitzer, firing 160kg shells.

@SuperSix capacity of 10 missiles would greatly hamper the tank's ability to operate and would need to operate near an ammo carrier/closer to the base. But then, you would need to store them on the hull where there's no escape path for all the pressure when the missiles got cooked inside
.
About the front section it is severly undersized and it will be very uncomfortable for the driver to operate there and it'll reduce the armor effectiveness, and requiring more time to enter or exit the vehicle
.
This tank having missile launcher and posessing some sort of anti air weaponry makes this tank a jack of all trades but a master of none. The limited number of missiles to counter against air threats to be considered as an anti air, having insufficient ATGM/shells to be considered a tank destroyer, not having enough small caliber weapons to be considered an anti infantry platform, and the limited range of the missile to be considered an artillery
.
For the armor, think of ilit like this; you have two very dirty piece of wood and an expensive bottle of glue. Although the glue can hold the two pieces together, preparing the surface before applying the glue would make the two pieces bond stronger with less amount of glue. It means that a better armor layout would give the same result for less cost, and less weight. Try looking at modern MBTs for reference and try to suit them to your doctrine
.
It's even better if you use the same hull and mate different kinds of turret for different kind of purpose for part commonality

This is not shooting regular kinetic energy round this is shooting missles @NirvashTec

@SuperSix A 250mm gun would surpass the T92 HMC, require a lot of loaders or a crane, have limited space, be extremely heavy, slow down the vehicle, limit the vehicle to second line support and most likely a danger for the crew because they're lugging around massive shells which could be set off when hit.
Oh, and 250mm isn't exactly for MBTs.
They're Artillery Guns.

I know it was hard @Bearclaw189

As in you did a modern tank@SuperSix

I’m making a XMT-A2 and wow is it good looking @Bearclaw189

Yes? @Bearclaw189

Yes!

Although I’m pretty new to modern tanks sorry.

Yes it can hold only 10 op in the racks but full loaded it can hold 20.
Think of the first quarter of the front as a triangle block and the driver sits a little farther back.
This is kind of like and artillery system and is not really meant to fight close combat infantry but can close combat vehicles.
Well yeah that’s true.
This is high tech uranium depleted armor that can stop most regular and some missle projectiles without a protection system but illl take it into comsderation with my A2 model. @exosuit

It a heavy MBT.
X does not stand for Expierimental maybe in the first stage of testing.
Gas Turbine engine.
10 STG Missles (they are big)
6 STA Missles (in pods)
400 Gallons
Yes but the Missles curve around incredibly fast and are very nimble.
This is not meant for close quarters urban environments but from a decent range.
About a 250mm ATGM out of Main gun.
It is quite a small breach.
Oh yeah I’ll add that thanks.
I wanted to make it an all around fighter (mostly) and I thought that would even good idea
@NirvashTec thanks for help.

For an ATGM to fly that far means the rocket itself would be prettt massive in size, coupled with the rather small turret the tank mounts meaning the tank will store considerably less rockets inside the tank, not to mention the awkward placement of the Commander's hatch, would make the option for a closed compartment for the muntions unavailable, drastically reducing the crew survivability rate.
.
The driver is located really far to the front of the tank would mean the space in the front of the tank would be used to accomodate the driver's leg, assuming they have them, and the rather steep angling on the upper glacis would make an option to mount ERA plates or some sort of a modular armor plates a better option, or to redesign the entire front section.
.
A hull down position wouldn't be the best thing to do with this tank because of the extremely short turret in height the turret has, limiting the ability to successfully having a line of sight on the enemy over a hill, and the lack of MG mounted on the tank makes the vehicle more vulnerable to infantries as it would require the tank to traverse it's turret in order to successfully engage the target.
.
Although it's armor profile on the turret is decent, i don't believe 100-210mm of armor is adequate to stop incoming projectile, and the lack of any sort of hard/soft kill systems installed, and the somewhat clunky armor distribution makes the tank although pretty well armored against some last decade equipments, obsolete in modern combat.

@SuperSix that seems like M60 or M48

Some things to be clarified about this.

• What exactly is the class of this thing?
  It seems too heavily armoured to be a light or medium tank, it doesn't look like it's fit for reconnaissance duty and that so it's most likely going to fall under Tank Destroyer.
• X in the designation would mean it's still in the Experimental Phase
• What type of engine does it have?
• How many rounds could this carry?
• How many liters/gallons of fuel?
• Engagements with the Armata would be fairly difficult due to it's Gun/Launcher capability which means that if it were to detect you and loaded it's ATGM, you'd probably be dead considering this doesn't have any APS whatsoever.
• Why is there no MG?
• What exactly is the caliber of the gun?
• How could the gun depress? (Gun breech would hit the turret roof.)
• Reload Time and System?
• What led to the decision of making a vehicle having to do AA duty as well?

@SuperSix indeed

Thanks @Roswell

Pretty nice

I’ve been working on many styles and types for 3 years and thx @AWESOMENESS360

This is amazing, you have some pretty good skills when it comes to tanks!

Thx @BlackZero

This is awesome

Yep @Strikefighter04

Nice!