Profile image

Meet the Merlin-Powered Missile: Mach Breaker

25.1k JohnnyBoythePilot  5.0 years ago

UPDATE: There has been a slight mix-up in the designation. X-5 has actually already been used by the Bell X-5, so Mach Breaker's designation has been switched to "X-52" instead since its unused.

This is probably one of the most ridiculous aircraft Rainier Aerospace has ever conceived. This, is the X-5, otherwise known as "Mack Breaker". Mach Breaker is a pure-bred experimental aircraft powered by a single highly modified Packard V12 Merlin utilizing a quad-turbo set-up that drives 4 counter-rotating propeller fan blades in the rear tail-pipe. The X-5 has 4 main air inlets, 1 goes for air cooling the V12 (as well as a source for air for the engine itself; combustion), the other goes for the turbos, and the 2 main box-inlets on the side feed air to the 4 fans in the duct so they can compress it and blow it out of the rear duct-nozzle to provide thrust. Not exactly sure how realistic this all would be IRL, but I was thinking of how a piston-engine aircraft could go supersonic and knew the biggest limitation was the exposed propellers that caused lots of issues at near-Mach 1 speeds. So I thought, "What if the propellers were in a duct and air was feed to the propellers via supersonic air inlets like on a normal jet aircraft?"; and this contraption was born. Took me about 2 days to complete it in SP.

This is purely an experimental aircraft and has no intention on production, even as a kit-plane, and only 2 or 3 prototypes will be constructed. It would be interesting to see if this could race at the Reno Air Races in Unlimited Class, but I think it just might be to fast for the course. Mach Breaker's first official "canonical" flight will be this weekend some time, and yes, there will be a video of it. ;)

Anyways enjoy some teasers.







Gonna be released some time this weekend. Comment T if you would like to be tagged.

Tag List:
@randomusername
@CptJacobson
@AtlasSP
@Roswell
@TheFantasticTyphoon
@OrangeBoardEnterprise
@Aerofy
@LancasterAce
@SubXTribe
@Chancey21
@GeneralOliverVonBismarck
@Stonewarrior272
@Nickr
@ACEPILOT109
@CrashFighter05

  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image

    T

    2.0 years ago
  • Profile image

    @exosuit
    True, but this plane is using piston power solely for the purpose of breaking a record. In other words its not supposed to be practical or efficient, which is why only 2 or 3 of them will only be built for research & record-setting/breaking purposes.

    5.0 years ago
  • Profile image
    2,749 thecrusader

    T

    5.0 years ago
  • Profile image

    T

    5.0 years ago
  • Profile image
    18.2k exosuit

    @GeneralOliverVonBismarck jet engine have "propellers", wink wink

    +1 5.0 years ago
  • Profile image
    18.2k exosuit

    Correct me if I'm wrong, but if you were to place the propellers in a duct, wouldn't it be more efficient to just use jet engines instead?

    5.0 years ago
  • Profile image

    @GeneralOliverVonBismarck
    Oh don't worry I'll have a version without the modded parts (the instrumentation).

    5.0 years ago
  • Profile image
    69.2k Chancey21

    T

    5.0 years ago
  • Profile image
    9,972 Poro

    T

    +1 5.0 years ago
  • Profile image
    6,356 Aeromotive

    T

    +1 5.0 years ago
  • Profile image

    Tee

    +1 5.0 years ago
  • Profile image
    37.6k Typhoon03

    T

    +1 5.0 years ago
  • Profile image
    7,256 Roswell

    T

    +1 5.0 years ago
  • Profile image

    @DeezDucks
    Yes it is indeed retractable landing gear. I mean its supposed to go super sonic solely on piston power, so you'd want as little drag as possible.

    5.0 years ago
  • Profile image
    10.9k Rub3n213

    I want 50

    +1 5.0 years ago
  • Profile image
    18.0k AtlasSP

    T

    +1 5.0 years ago
  • Profile image
    7,775 Karzigg

    T

    +1 5.0 years ago
  • Profile image
    Mod DeezDucks

    This is a very interesting looking design for sure, the gear will be retractable right? If not that seems like it would negate the looks of the rest of the build.

    5.0 years ago