18.0k windshifter1 Comments

  • WR-41 Royal Legacy one year ago

    @RepublicOfCursedPlanes @DatFiat126Guy19 @CR929thenewSPplayer

  • WR-41 Royal Legacy one year ago

    @MrCopty @GuyFolk @SPAircraftOfficial

  • WR-41 Royal Legacy one year ago

    @Pilotgoose @ToeTips @hfusiwjf29

  • WR-41 Royal Legacy one year ago

    @LimeAir @UssrLENIN @OrderlyHippo

  • WR-41 Royal Legacy one year ago

    @TheTomatoLover @WinsWings @AdmiralGelvain

  • WR-31 Surge (Carrier Capable) 1.1 years ago

    @Jacob30x Ok thats big!

  • WR-31 Surge (Carrier Capable) 1.1 years ago

    @Jacob30x Awesome! How big then?

  • Some SWL-120 Updates 1.1 years ago

    @PlaneFlightX Ok, I assume the test sounds were for the SWL-120 engines?
    Interesting about the possibility of a sound mod - I know you are quite busy so I shall ask around other modders if they can finish/create that idea.
    For discord, sure. But I am currently travelling right now so I'll inquire about it later when I get back, or whenever need be.

  • WR-31 Surge (Carrier Capable) 1.1 years ago

    @Jacob30x What piece did you get?

  • WR-31 Surge (Carrier Capable) 1.1 years ago

    @Jacob30x wow ok!

  • 20k? 1.1 years ago

    @TheMouse :O really where? But say if do it manually ok?

  • 20k? 1.1 years ago

    I think I want to learn coding and make a bot for upvoting all of people's posts lol

  • Some SWL-120 Updates 1.1 years ago

    @PlaneFlightX Apologies for peppering you with questions, I hope I dont bother you. I am simply interested in getting deeper into the more technical side of SP. I hope to do modding to make new parts mainly, as well as some FT work. I would like to follow your style of incredible detail, actually! But with smaller, general aviation aircraft - not as large scale and impressive as yours. For my current (But delayed to to computer issues) project, a C172, it helps that I am part of a small aviation recreational club, so I can see and inspect the C172 simulator there for extreme detail. Without that sort of access, I can't imagine the digging and research you would have to do to produce this.

  • Some SWL-120 Updates 1.1 years ago

    @PlaneFlightX If not, do you think a sound mod would be supported in SP? Is it pontentially possible?

  • Some SWL-120 Updates 1.1 years ago

    @PlaneFlightX Understood about the fuel. Good idea.

    About the tone generator, I have seen it around but was never sure what it did. Can you import sound files for it to play in sp, like maybe replace the engine sounds? Or is it just a single, adjustable tone or something?

  • Some SWL-120 Updates 1.1 years ago

    @PlaneFlightX Yeah I understand. So many projects, what to focus on? In the end I do a little bit of all and none of them get finished xD

  • Some SWL-120 Updates 1.1 years ago

    @PlaneFlightX Thanks for the tug! Will test soon.

  • Tone Generator 1.1 years ago

    @hpgbproductions Can this play sound files in SP to make custom engine sounds and the likes?

  • Boeing 747-400 Heavy (Virgin Atlantic) 1.1 years ago

    lol again dominating front page 5 planes

  • Some SWL-120 Updates 1.1 years ago

    @PlaneFlightX Ohhh, ok
    So the entire seating is 1 part, engine 1 part and so on, is that correct?
    For the infinite fuel, if possible please dont because I do like the time limitation for realism.
    Also, ok so it is mainly 787. I quite like it!
    This just sparked my memory, I was meaning to ask you if you could tell me of the best, useful parts mods? It seems just looking on the SP website does not show all of them for some reason.

  • WR-31 Surge (Carrier Capable) 1.1 years ago

    @Jacob30x Wow! So its just a piece? Of the real thing? Or is it like a model?

  • [M-war] petition to remove Mroofington 1.1 years ago

    @FOXHOUND26 Ok, understood. Its fine, just remember for next time! :D

  • WR-31 Surge (Carrier Capable) 1.1 years ago

    @Jacob30x Oh nice! A road trip? I did one of those around Europe a year or two back, but not as many places. How long did it take?

  • WR-31 Surge (Carrier Capable) 1.1 years ago

    @Jacob30x Shame you missed it, we just had a full fledged war here. The enemy just announced their surrender a day or two ago. Never mind, hopefully we can do something again soon.

  • WR-31 Surge (Carrier Capable) 1.1 years ago

    @Jacob30x Ooh nice! Hope you had fun! How was it?

  • [M-war] petition to remove Mroofington 1.1 years ago

    @FOXHOUND26 Sure, sure, I can respect that. But don’t ruin it for others who do want realism. To each their own.

  • Some SWL-120 Updates 1.1 years ago

    Also, I remember you having AI airport vehicles for aircraft pushback. Would you be able to supply even just a barebones/work-in-progress version? Many times I have wanted such a thing for me to spawn at SP airport to help me reverse, but I cannot and just have to spawn my aircraft elsewhere. Kinda ruins the immersion, especially when using your amazing SWL-10 (That is the aircraft I want it for)

  • Some SWL-120 Updates 1.1 years ago

    Amazing, unbelievable how you did it so detailed! A few questions.
    1. The engine, is it a modded part? I dont see how you could achieve that in SP itself without 20Billion parts
    2. What is empty weight negative 110,198,900lbs? Is it a glitch? Will it affect the actual aircraft performance?
    3. Did you mod the seats? Or did you use the Interior Goodies mod, because it looks very similar.
    4. What is its size based on? A330? A340? Or others? What is its intended range and performance (Speed, max altitude, etc)?

  • [WAR NEWS] Top Headline: SkyPark Threatens Nuclear War 1.1 years ago

    @derlurje If you have the right factories and technology tho, some members specialise in different vehicles - no point in making a plane in a boat factory

  • [WAR NEWS] Top Headline: SkyPark Threatens Nuclear War 1.1 years ago

    @derlurje Is that what you were asking?

  • [WAR NEWS] Top Headline: SkyPark Threatens Nuclear War 1.1 years ago

    @derlurje What do you mean? I would assume WAEC is the main producer but as Allies any MGLA member can make it.

  • WR-31 Surge (Carrier Capable) 1.1 years ago

    @Dracul0Anderson
    @TheAviator77

  • WR-31 Surge (Carrier Capable) 1.1 years ago

    @cybermanka
    @derlurje

  • WR-31 Surge (Carrier Capable) 1.1 years ago

    @DatTrainAndCarGuy19
    @Noname918181
    @Graingy

  • WR-31 Surge (Carrier Capable) 1.1 years ago

    @Mousewithamachinegun122
    @CrestelAeronautics
    @TheUltimatePlaneLover

  • WR-31 Surge (Carrier Capable) 1.1 years ago

    @Zaineman

  • WR-31 Surge (Carrier Capable) 1.1 years ago

    @VittorVolotok @LunarEclipseSP @Jacob30x

  • WR-31 Surge (Carrier Capable) 1.1 years ago

    @RepublicOfCursedPlanes @CR929thenewSPplayer

  • WR-31 Surge (Carrier Capable) 1.1 years ago

    @MrCopty @GuyFolk @SPAircraftOfficial

  • WR-31 Surge (Carrier Capable) 1.1 years ago

    @Pilotgoose @ToeTips @hfusiwjf29

  • WR-31 Surge (Carrier Capable) 1.1 years ago

    @LimeAir @UssrLENIN @OrderlyHippo

  • WR-31 Surge (Carrier Capable) 1.1 years ago

    @TheTomatoLover @WinsWings @AdmiralGelvain

  • [WAR NEWS] Top Headline: SkyPark Threatens Nuclear War 1.1 years ago

    @Dracul0Anderson
    @TheAviator77

  • [WAR NEWS] Top Headline: SkyPark Threatens Nuclear War 1.1 years ago

    @cybermanka
    @derlurje

  • [WAR NEWS] Top Headline: SkyPark Threatens Nuclear War 1.1 years ago

    @DatTrainAndCarGuy19
    @Noname918181
    @Graingy

  • [WAR NEWS] Top Headline: SkyPark Threatens Nuclear War 1.1 years ago

    @Mousewithamachinegun122
    @CrestelAeronautics
    @TheUltimatePlaneLover

  • [WAR NEWS] Top Headline: SkyPark Threatens Nuclear War 1.1 years ago

    @MonarchiiwithastolenMG
    @LunarEclipseSP
    @SamuelJamesCastor

  • Type-76 BCV MRNS Chervona Noblysk 1.1 years ago

    @Noname918181 Lol baked potato my favourite

  • Type-76 BCV MRNS Chervona Noblysk 1.1 years ago

    @MonarchiiwithastolenMG I so badly want to out-build this, but I cant as I am overseas

  • WR-31 Surge (Carrier Capable) 1.1 years ago

    @Seeras Dont take this wrongly, I am just confused. I suppose it is fine if you leave it, I would just have to make it very clear in the description I guess.