@Diloph considering i suffer from ADHD and autism. id say no on my point of view. im fine with taking the same frame or make a similar to exploit its potential. when i do have an idea of a new frame i will try to build that from scratch. but most of the time i try to share or show... well they apparently turn out bad or just not interesting. so i try new things... but i prefer exploiting 1 design frame and see how different it can be.
not a bad design. honestly its rather good. only one complaint is the incredibly short hull but considering its based on late interwar/early ww2 tanks, its really good.
this plane is definitely a nice design. tho the only real critique is the rear end of the fuselages design being rather shoddily done. but overall its a good enough design. 9/10
@Mustang51 well as annoying as it is.... there are those people who probly knows nothing about propulsion. also btw coudl ye help with some landing gears? im working on a twin engine plane and i think it could be good with custom gear
@Diloph its ok. im just a bit unlucky there
@BnanaX i guess not many really liked the design. oh well it was an attempt on a new frame.
@Diloph if you do take time to take a look at every plane and tank i have ever posted, you can see a few being completely different
@Diloph considering i suffer from ADHD and autism. id say no on my point of view. im fine with taking the same frame or make a similar to exploit its potential. when i do have an idea of a new frame i will try to build that from scratch. but most of the time i try to share or show... well they apparently turn out bad or just not interesting. so i try new things... but i prefer exploiting 1 design frame and see how different it can be.
aye. no real plane @Diloph
@Diloph most are just called prototype because i cant literally name all the planes. so i can just host a name suggestion.
as for make a real plane. i have a policy of not recreating IRL planes so that request has the be denied. no exceptions
i guess this really failed
the feeling people turn a post to a chat
@BnanaX what skill? just look at Anchovy. he got more skill than i could hope for
~~affordable then~~
aye puns are fun.
@DuceAnchovy "tank"s for posting a video
@BnanaX thats ok. aslong as ye just leave credit or just tell me youre gonna make your version of said original, then its fine by me.
@BnanaX ah. THEN ITS BROTHERS IN ARMS!
@BnanaX wait simpleplanes is family?
@DuceAnchovy hmmmm in that case. then ill leave this little challenge. take the BT-5 frame and build a custom tank of your own design choice.
@DuceAnchovy aye. not american copied suspension here. only stronk stalinium shocks here
no tankers were knocked out during the jump
-USSR officials
is the BT-7 Next? bte nice work. 10/10
simple planes logic. thats how it works
excellent big jet
looks like a normal plane. if you want it to be italian id recommend lowering the exhaust and make the left wing a bit longer
i say a custom made fighter is what you should go for next @benjamindowning
i think that luck is rather low but meh...
no worries. i think 1500 is silver while 5000 is gold
not a bad simple design. 9/10 now i really need to start making new tanks
crazy amounts of details. 9/10
nice plane but the nose is making the plane look like its a cartoon think drawn up by a kid. despite that its a good plane 7/10
@DuceAnchovy i bet the next years designs are gonna be much better
not a bad design. honestly its rather good. only one complaint is the incredibly short hull but considering its based on late interwar/early ww2 tanks, its really good.
@FlyingHueman i usually dont like jets so yeah its high praise. maybe even extreme but its still praise
this jet is one of the most good looking jets i have ever seen. 10/10
@Nick2007 well.... its to be expected when i try to make a bomber
this plane is definitely a nice design. tho the only real critique is the rear end of the fuselages design being rather shoddily done. but overall its a good enough design. 9/10
@Mustang51
@Mustang51 http://www.simpleplanes.com/a/6Kx8j2/Prototype-54-Project
just a moment
@Mustang51 well as annoying as it is.... there are those people who probly knows nothing about propulsion. also btw coudl ye help with some landing gears? im working on a twin engine plane and i think it could be good with custom gear
well its very close to a hurricane. bottom radiator is a bit wrong but overall its rather accurate
@TitanIncorporated because realistically its not really that good?
those are extremely large elevators
@Zippy6 probly dont want to make a mess off the tracks?
@afriad0kaz i believe so. but the game i believe came after the movie
hmm
hes bringing in a jet... ~~hmmm maybe make a new fighter?~~
@Mustang51 aye aye.
@afriad0kaz but isnt it a plane based on the anime skycrawlers_
i may use the wings for another project as i really like these wings for some reason
@Mustang51 ok
@Mustang51 odd question. have you ever tried to make planes at the size i make them? if not, give it a try
@Mustang51 landing gears are something im bad at