That was a meh challenge to me... I landed this on the first try with ease lmao.
It's not like any of the control surfaces were entirely destroyed, the missing parts only included one elevator trim, the entire engine, one part of the wing and a landing gear.
Here's how you land this:
-point the plane to the lowest part of bandit runway.(which is the part of runway closes)
-trim as the plane goes slower and make sure the nose DOES NOT point lower.
-make sure the plane DOES NOT roll left or right excessively.
-pull the nose up towards the final approach and perform a small flare.
-profit.
How to NOT land:
-point to nose high.
-point the nose extremely low.
-attempt a vertical climb.
-try to turn the plane left or right.(longer path and turning reduces speed)
-NOT perform a flare. (because there's only two landing gears so a soft landing is crucial)
-let the plane roll left or right.
Tbh I want change @IliaPilot 's tank too.
Maybe some armour, better all terrain capability, maneuverability, firepower and changed controls? Tho this comes at a price that'll change the external looks of the tank.
Btw I'll use your first post
@RYMA232Aeronautics wait a minute...So you're saying it's supposed to be the instagram egg meme? I only heard about it today with the gossips in my class, sounded funny XD
I was carefully searching on with the spaceship tag and out of all the ridiculous looking designs I picked this one and it is probably the best vehicle I've ever flown.
Now...The thing...is I've noticed that you create some really interesting things as I've recently seen you a lot in the website, I might as well follow you.@Spectre2520
Simpleplanes has been dying ever since some youtubers started leaving simple planes, a while later some youtubers like frantic matty still play this game however the popularity of his channel or any other channels doing simple planes content will not be enough to sustain the player base. In the end imo this has nothing to do with updates...
Note:there are still tags with the name of the youtubers who used to do videos on simple planes.
@Hadentheaviator hmmm...Someone said way over the top and silly? Hell no...I wanted to build something like this ever since I've started playing this game.
However you gotta understand that everything is a trade off...Something that works well may not look good while something that looks good won't work well...How about this... Let's change the requirements.(and tag me in I'm gonna try this challenge)
Changes that may help"
-allow any build of an irl replica or any aircraft that existed from the media to blueprints.
-allow all types of engines to be used.
-remove the requirement for realistic engine, beacons with ag1, navs with ag2, strobes with ag3, taxi lights with ag4, landing on(?) with ag5, and engine with ag 8, working flaps and last but not least remove the cockpit requirement.
Fyi here's my first ever plane and post at the same time. Btw the successor I used for this challenge uses the same paint.
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/72zZ1J/eagle
@Aarons123 well no it wasn't for its time, simple planes had no trim back then and the ai loved to pull hard on the controls which meant the maneuverable plane would stall out every dogfight and that the plane always wanted to go down instead of up, then the rocket launcher would explode if you pull up while firing it which was extremely unhandy and then because the plane was wobbly in a long range interception. There was a chance that the plane would explode while firing a missile. Last of all the plane was extremely bad in terms of fuel efficiency and would run out of fuel in minutes! DON'T FLY IT INTO BATTLE the end.
@OliverFlys if only it was allowed in the challenge...Make it a successor to the post.
Here:
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/6b92N0/Watercraft-Challenge
It doesn't look like an f22 in anyway, however I could describe it as a super maneuverable mig25 with the top speed being way lower. The wings were a cool design and the performance was amazing but I think the plane lacks range,firepower and armour, I tested it on my interceptor(it's called the supremacy Mk i, I haven't uploaded it and it goes more than 1000mph) and fighter(the sparrow IV you can check this one out) and I noticed that the plane may explode when you place it in a far range battle. But I'll give credit to this amazing fighter design that I haven't seen such a nice one in ages.
Which is these are allowed and which are not allowed?(planes I found on the site that I'm interested in)
-westland whirlwind.
-vought f4u corsair.(flat tip wing variant?)
-gloster gladiator.
-fairey firefly.
- de Havilland dh98 mosquito.
-boulton paul defiant.
@Pheonexplanes123 hmmm...the engine has the mist you can have for vanila work, however the main xml comes with the engine and its experimental wings size and placement. the car's speed and handling comes from the engine, the faster the car the more downforce is needed for the car to be able to turn.
for hp tho, if you could get the prototype, you may notice its actually powered by one car engine and two jet engines which provides the craft enough hp to reach about 600mph+, that speed required me to build the car with wings and airbrakes had to be used while turning in corners.
@Pheonexplanes123 you can't just...Put that as a title I mean...demonsniper8 kinda beat you to it...I have a fast car with the similar time and I can relate because demonsniper8 is an absolute professional at making cars in this game.
FYI: my car can finish gold Prix in 0:29 and I once showed it to demonsniper8. If he could remember it's the X-15 hypercard, it got stolen once due to its amazing performance but it's experimental and is prone to crashing, if you could find it in my profile feel free to test it out.
Tho this is just a less practical wing... its...Not gonna be useful until something else is found. And that the rotators are useless when these upgrades I mentioned below are applied.
Hmmmm...Would it be better if the "magnus wings" were smaller but has wider wingspan so it may produce less drag and have similar lift at the same time? Have the rotator spin faster too?
@Liamwellman123 are we allowed to use a sort of defense system to stop the rocket? ( I came up with an insane solution, I made a gun that fires very fast and has high damage but low velocity and low bullet life, which makes the gun fire out something like a blade. This defense works on rockets, missiles and projectiles by destroying the projectile before it reaches target. On rockets pod rockets, if it defends against the rocket well, the rocket pod will explode and it's rather weird, though I seek approval of it so please reply).
@Liamwellman123 I've came up with one solution but it's impractical as hell. You can use spaced armour so that the rocket's explosion radius doesn't damage the armour as much, however the distance is incredibly far so back to the drawing board ;-;
@Novemberpapa243 sure thing...
How will this be possible in anyway?
That was a meh challenge to me... I landed this on the first try with ease lmao.
+1It's not like any of the control surfaces were entirely destroyed, the missing parts only included one elevator trim, the entire engine, one part of the wing and a landing gear.
Here's how you land this:
-point the plane to the lowest part of bandit runway.(which is the part of runway closes)
-trim as the plane goes slower and make sure the nose DOES NOT point lower.
-make sure the plane DOES NOT roll left or right excessively.
-pull the nose up towards the final approach and perform a small flare.
-profit.
How to NOT land:
-point to nose high.
-point the nose extremely low.
-attempt a vertical climb.
-try to turn the plane left or right.(longer path and turning reduces speed)
-NOT perform a flare. (because there's only two landing gears so a soft landing is crucial)
-let the plane roll left or right.
Airobatic? You mean aerobatic?
Tbh I want change @IliaPilot 's tank too.
Maybe some armour, better all terrain capability, maneuverability, firepower and changed controls? Tho this comes at a price that'll change the external looks of the tank.
Btw I'll use your first post
@Diamondwolf that seems to be the longest deadline I've ever seen.
I've decided to use a heavy bomber for this.
And it wasn't as difficult as you'd think.
@Hadentheaviator awww... well still...Have a good day.
@Robossbomb I have to change the description now so that people know how this works:
-Drop the bomb.
-switch camera.
-profit.
@RYMA232Aeronautics wait a minute...So you're saying it's supposed to be the instagram egg meme? I only heard about it today with the gossips in my class, sounded funny XD
+1What's so special about this?
I was carefully searching on with the spaceship tag and out of all the ridiculous looking designs I picked this one and it is probably the best vehicle I've ever flown.
Now...The thing...is I've noticed that you create some really interesting things as I've recently seen you a lot in the website, I might as well follow you.@Spectre2520
Well tbh I tend to abuse the bugs and used them as game mechanics sometimes.
Simpleplanes has been dying ever since some youtubers started leaving simple planes, a while later some youtubers like frantic matty still play this game however the popularity of his channel or any other channels doing simple planes content will not be enough to sustain the player base. In the end imo this has nothing to do with updates...
Note:there are still tags with the name of the youtubers who used to do videos on simple planes.
@RYMA232Aeronautics so what is this supposed to be anyway?
+1@Hadentheaviator hmmm...Someone said way over the top and silly? Hell no...I wanted to build something like this ever since I've started playing this game.
However you gotta understand that everything is a trade off...Something that works well may not look good while something that looks good won't work well...How about this... Let's change the requirements.(and tag me in I'm gonna try this challenge)
Changes that may help"
-allow any build of an irl replica or any aircraft that existed from the media to blueprints.
-allow all types of engines to be used.
-remove the requirement for realistic engine, beacons with ag1, navs with ag2, strobes with ag3, taxi lights with ag4, landing on(?) with ag5, and engine with ag 8, working flaps and last but not least remove the cockpit requirement.
@Aarons123 oh thanks...
Tag this with "challenge“ so that someone else would see this.
+1Fyi here's my first ever plane and post at the same time. Btw the successor I used for this challenge uses the same paint.
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/72zZ1J/eagle
@Aarons123 well no it wasn't for its time, simple planes had no trim back then and the ai loved to pull hard on the controls which meant the maneuverable plane would stall out every dogfight and that the plane always wanted to go down instead of up, then the rocket launcher would explode if you pull up while firing it which was extremely unhandy and then because the plane was wobbly in a long range interception. There was a chance that the plane would explode while firing a missile. Last of all the plane was extremely bad in terms of fuel efficiency and would run out of fuel in minutes! DON'T FLY IT INTO BATTLE the end.
@OliverFlys if only it was allowed in the challenge...Make it a successor to the post.
Here:
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/6b92N0/Watercraft-Challenge
@MAHADI lol 23rd place
@Robossbomb you mean you dont have it on mobile?
@lolcreeper45 im not sure whether this works on pc...sorry cant help you here.
So is this a sort of "experimentation" here?
@Strikefighter04 nope, everything will just get obliterated due to infinite blast radius.
+1@MAHADI I kinda just got mines uploaded, it sucks though.
It doesn't look like an f22 in anyway, however I could describe it as a super maneuverable mig25 with the top speed being way lower. The wings were a cool design and the performance was amazing but I think the plane lacks range,firepower and armour, I tested it on my interceptor(it's called the supremacy Mk i, I haven't uploaded it and it goes more than 1000mph) and fighter(the sparrow IV you can check this one out) and I noticed that the plane may explode when you place it in a far range battle. But I'll give credit to this amazing fighter design that I haven't seen such a nice one in ages.
Which is these are allowed and which are not allowed?(planes I found on the site that I'm interested in)
-westland whirlwind.
-vought f4u corsair.(flat tip wing variant?)
-gloster gladiator.
-fairey firefly.
- de Havilland dh98 mosquito.
-boulton paul defiant.
So...Why is this car so heavy exactly?
@DemonSniper8 so is this challenge dead?(it's still cool, haven't played simple planes for months!!! XD)
@Liamwellman123 sorry just nearly left simple planes forever.
@Stalin5102 🤔 I don't understand Russian... Guess I'll translate it.
Edit: "yeah why not XD" because it's funny XD
Is this a tank sized gun or a gun sized tank? XD
@DemonSniper8 I couldn't, since the car apparently couldn't reach 1000mph, which was an old hypercar challenge requirement probably a year ago.
@Pheonexplanes123 hmmm...the engine has the mist you can have for vanila work, however the main xml comes with the engine and its experimental wings size and placement. the car's speed and handling comes from the engine, the faster the car the more downforce is needed for the car to be able to turn.
for hp tho, if you could get the prototype, you may notice its actually powered by one car engine and two jet engines which provides the craft enough hp to reach about 600mph+, that speed required me to build the car with wings and airbrakes had to be used while turning in corners.
@Pheonexplanes123 you can't just...Put that as a title I mean...demonsniper8 kinda beat you to it...I have a fast car with the similar time and I can relate because demonsniper8 is an absolute professional at making cars in this game.
FYI: my car can finish gold Prix in 0:29 and I once showed it to demonsniper8. If he could remember it's the X-15 hypercard, it got stolen once due to its amazing performance but it's experimental and is prone to crashing, if you could find it in my profile feel free to test it out.
What a weird creations...Why do you need this though?
I created a 1000mph + version but I will not be uploading it to this site.
Hmmmm...I thought this was an old concept...Oh well...
Tho this is just a less practical wing... its...Not gonna be useful until something else is found. And that the rotators are useless when these upgrades I mentioned below are applied.
Hmmmm...Would it be better if the "magnus wings" were smaller but has wider wingspan so it may produce less drag and have similar lift at the same time? Have the rotator spin faster too?
It's pretty nice but I'd prefer to set up the thrusters by myself.
Then again it's pretty good as an extra part.
@Liamwellman123 are we allowed to use a sort of defense system to stop the rocket? ( I came up with an insane solution, I made a gun that fires very fast and has high damage but low velocity and low bullet life, which makes the gun fire out something like a blade. This defense works on rockets, missiles and projectiles by destroying the projectile before it reaches target. On rockets pod rockets, if it defends against the rocket well, the rocket pod will explode and it's rather weird, though I seek approval of it so please reply).
@Liamwellman123 I've came up with one solution but it's impractical as hell. You can use spaced armour so that the rocket's explosion radius doesn't damage the armour as much, however the distance is incredibly far so back to the drawing board ;-;
@Liamwellman123 I'm having a bad time trying and I might fail.
@CRJ900Pilot lol
Hmmmm, this new tank is going to be very heavy, slow and impractical but I have an idea on how to build it.
@dovahdesigns thx.
@CRJ900Pilot yeh. The rc stunt planes made with a paper think fuselage...I took inspiration from that.