@11qazxc it's more about the fact that the game doesn't like label text displaying too many pixels, that's what is causing the lag.
I was just saying that making this kind of thing is lighter with fuselage blocks even if it doesn't seem to and that it is more difficult.
But this application is still impressive.
Why am I tagged on this ? Please don't tag people that asked to be tagged. I have nothing against this build since I didn't test it but it doesn't make me want to test it.
Well I'm sure that the AI is good at flying it but it's impossible to dogfight it since it takes like 25Gs and accelerates to mach 2 in three seconds and doesn't loose any energy.
@OrdinaryTankBuilder if he deserve it, I don't have to ask for it, if he don't, he souldn't ask for it, so in both cases asking is useless, and not allowed.
that looks cool and heavy lol, 8K is nice but why didn't you use just full hd textures ? it would have looked the same a less heavier. the result looks awesome tho, great work
How can you make a old school prop plane, and compare it to a supersonic delta configuration jet plane (and a lot of funkytrees (if you even know what it is), custom made wings and parys) ? you just can't compare these planes... (oh and the pigben is better, nice try tho)
@Rjenteissussy It never did tho, and even if it maybe could do it, the top speed of the Mig 31 is lower than the one of the Mig 25 for several reasons : no need to go as fast since the Mig 31 as better avionics and missiles, so there isn't really the need to get as close to the enemy as the Mig 25 needed to be. Second reason, the soviet/russians learned a lot with the Mig 25 and how stressfull it was for the plane to go mach 3 so they limited the top speed, that doesn't mean the Mig 31 isn't capable of it, but a combat operational one isn't mean for it and will only reach that speed in special conditions, unlike the Mig 25 that could reach that speed more easely.
Wikipedia is great but the specs on it aren't that great since it doesn't do the difference between different versions, and as I said, a combat operational Mig 31 is slower (mach 2.8, which is still insane) than a combat operational Mig 25.
Growling Sidewinder is a DCS player and you can't use a game as a reference, especially when the Mig 31 and the SR 71 aren't real moduls in the game but mods.
The Mig 31 is an advanced version of the Mig 25, but that doesn't mean it's faster, it as more advanced avionics, weapons, weapons systems and flight specs thanks to composite materials.
@TRD for a teaser post I don't even see the problem with saying "t", I was talking about the fact that people ask to be tagged even on non-teaser posts and that's really annoying since some of my post are made for peope to talk about what they think of my build and help me making it better, not for asking tags
spitfires always win, it's incredible. must be one of the best vid of the site and for sure the best dogfight scene out here, even some movies don't know how to record a dogfight better than this. Amazing work, BRAVO
@edensk damn you're pretty good too for making high part-count builds ;) just kidding I agree with you, Qingqiu listen, having almost 3000 parts is already way to much, but so many parts on a build that doesn't look like having so much and doesn't have the right shape sometimes is even worse. Also the flight model is...weird ? not funny to fly ? boring ? The panneling is lame and that weird concave part is ugly, you could have used concave parts instead, the back of the wings are squarish. For me, this build is n't good, it's a "meh". (and I'm not happy because your thumbnail made me click and now I'm disappointed)
drama, the plane does actually reach Mach 1 pretty easely, this isn't a problem but don't say it doesn't. I also want to say that ok it's a game and a """"fictional"""""" version of the plane but it's still a F35 so a replica and you can't make a real plane fly like a space craft in star wars
I'm speakless in front of a build like this, the last Spitfire was already a master piece but now it's almost perfect (it's not perfect because I didn't make it ;) )
the rules are the rules, if you say that a collab can be done you don't have to "take down" a plane because it's a collab. Also even being gold, platinium, bronze or silver shouldn't be something to look at when somebody post for a challenge, it's not because somebody is brone that he will have more points (everybody need to be judge with the same eyes), also there's a lot of gold better than some platinium and some silver players better than golds. People with lower point count will improve if they want or have too. If you make peope win because they have a low point count they will think they are good enough and not improve. I didn't participate in this challenge so ego as nothing to do with me, it's just logical. I did two challenges and I know that some guys have why to much ego, but sometimes (and it's the case with the etendard IVP) the plane really just is the best.
@Phox excuse me guys for having a life lol oh no bad things happened I'm not doing well but I have to upload plane fast fast because it's so much more important...
please guys, I do my best, life isn't always easy on you and we all know it
"Oh yeah, did I mention the F-22 couldn’t even use it’s stupid weapon bays or thrust vectoring!? That literally makes the F-22 look like a WWI plane" What's the point of saying this ? It as nothing to do with the game, just a badly build F-22, a player creation nothing more
@11qazxc it's more about the fact that the game doesn't like label text displaying too many pixels, that's what is causing the lag.
+3I was just saying that making this kind of thing is lighter with fuselage blocks even if it doesn't seem to and that it is more difficult.
But this application is still impressive.
say hello to the lag
+3Why am I tagged on this ? Please don't tag people that asked to be tagged. I have nothing against this build since I didn't test it but it doesn't make me want to test it.
+3Well I'm sure that the AI is good at flying it but it's impossible to dogfight it since it takes like 25Gs and accelerates to mach 2 in three seconds and doesn't loose any energy.
+3@OrdinaryTankBuilder if he deserve it, I don't have to ask for it, if he don't, he souldn't ask for it, so in both cases asking is useless, and not allowed.
+3leave her lol, not everybody can find a girlfriend as perfect as mine :)) (she's pointing a gun on me help)
+3that looks cool and heavy lol, 8K is nice but why didn't you use just full hd textures ? it would have looked the same a less heavier. the result looks awesome tho, great work
+3How can you make a old school prop plane, and compare it to a supersonic delta configuration jet plane (and a lot of funkytrees (if you even know what it is), custom made wings and parys) ? you just can't compare these planes... (oh and the pigben is better, nice try tho)
+3"I lack the motivation to make realistic builds that would fetch high upvote counts".
you're doing that for points, so sad.
+3@Rjenteissussy It never did tho, and even if it maybe could do it, the top speed of the Mig 31 is lower than the one of the Mig 25 for several reasons : no need to go as fast since the Mig 31 as better avionics and missiles, so there isn't really the need to get as close to the enemy as the Mig 25 needed to be. Second reason, the soviet/russians learned a lot with the Mig 25 and how stressfull it was for the plane to go mach 3 so they limited the top speed, that doesn't mean the Mig 31 isn't capable of it, but a combat operational one isn't mean for it and will only reach that speed in special conditions, unlike the Mig 25 that could reach that speed more easely.
+3Wikipedia is great but the specs on it aren't that great since it doesn't do the difference between different versions, and as I said, a combat operational Mig 31 is slower (mach 2.8, which is still insane) than a combat operational Mig 25.
Growling Sidewinder is a DCS player and you can't use a game as a reference, especially when the Mig 31 and the SR 71 aren't real moduls in the game but mods.
The Mig 31 is an advanced version of the Mig 25, but that doesn't mean it's faster, it as more advanced avionics, weapons, weapons systems and flight specs thanks to composite materials.
@Whills haha that's why, you'll see, SP is far better for building complicated stuff ;)
+3@IICXLVIICDLXXXIIIDCXLVII being popular at school is already a dumb thing, wanting to be popular here is some brainless stuff.
+3@Sergio666 you forgot the spitfire one
+3@TRD for a teaser post I don't even see the problem with saying "t", I was talking about the fact that people ask to be tagged even on non-teaser posts and that's really annoying since some of my post are made for peope to talk about what they think of my build and help me making it better, not for asking tags
+3@IICXLVIICDLXXXIIIDCXLVII @Planeman1 @JeskoGoesVROOM
+3@Bellcat Forgot to mention that, yes, if it is a teaser post, everything's ok
+3coulb ba a good idea, keep them unlisted and you'll have a nice and clean account when your new build will arrive
+3@LeaveUsAlone how the hell is mikoyanster better ? even bogdan isn't as good
+3@ZWLenning they wouldn't get it
+3@IceCraftGaming I'm a master in my art
+3you took hours ?
+3@rexzion he did way too much by just existing
+3@DeveloperKorzalerke @MrCOPTY @ColonelCanada Laughs in real platinium
+3@PapaKernels and it wasn't lol, I used pistons and rotators to move the camera around @soldier289
+3making a tournament and not even knowing how MP works, that's fun
+3@SneakySniper just look at all the funky tree in it and you will understand :))
+3spitfires always win, it's incredible. must be one of the best vid of the site and for sure the best dogfight scene out here, even some movies don't know how to record a dogfight better than this. Amazing work, BRAVO
+3@edensk damn you're pretty good too for making high part-count builds ;) just kidding I agree with you, Qingqiu listen, having almost 3000 parts is already way to much, but so many parts on a build that doesn't look like having so much and doesn't have the right shape sometimes is even worse. Also the flight model is...weird ? not funny to fly ? boring ? The panneling is lame and that weird concave part is ugly, you could have used concave parts instead, the back of the wings are squarish. For me, this build is n't good, it's a "meh". (and I'm not happy because your thumbnail made me click and now I'm disappointed)
+3all those upvoting this build won't be able to win
+3@Simps no that """kid""", that's obviously a troll
+3drama, the plane does actually reach Mach 1 pretty easely, this isn't a problem but don't say it doesn't. I also want to say that ok it's a game and a """"fictional"""""" version of the plane but it's still a F35 so a replica and you can't make a real plane fly like a space craft in star wars
+3Yak 3 vibes
+3A look, another scimitar ! (just joking my last plane is a Scimitar) looks good tho
+3I'm speakless in front of a build like this, the last Spitfire was already a master piece but now it's almost perfect (it's not perfect because I didn't make it ;) )
+3perfect for making planes
+3the rules are the rules, if you say that a collab can be done you don't have to "take down" a plane because it's a collab. Also even being gold, platinium, bronze or silver shouldn't be something to look at when somebody post for a challenge, it's not because somebody is brone that he will have more points (everybody need to be judge with the same eyes), also there's a lot of gold better than some platinium and some silver players better than golds. People with lower point count will improve if they want or have too. If you make peope win because they have a low point count they will think they are good enough and not improve. I didn't participate in this challenge so ego as nothing to do with me, it's just logical. I did two challenges and I know that some guys have why to much ego, but sometimes (and it's the case with the etendard IVP) the plane really just is the best.
+3@winterro hmmm, no images anymore, mhhhh
+2excellent, as always
+2@Sm10684 so much hate lol
+2Actually, MisterT already did this a few months ago, but with an AI bomber that actually has it's whole crew ejecting in case of crashing.
+2@HarrisM It does work, you just doesn't do it right.
+2What doesn't work for you ?
@Aviator01 @TheFlyingHusky @FoxtrotCharlieCharlieX
+2@Phox excuse me guys for having a life lol oh no bad things happened I'm not doing well but I have to upload plane fast fast because it's so much more important...
please guys, I do my best, life isn't always easy on you and we all know it
+2There, I made this tutorial
+2Tested it, it's a really good HUD.
+2"Oh yeah, did I mention the F-22 couldn’t even use it’s stupid weapon bays or thrust vectoring!? That literally makes the F-22 look like a WWI plane" What's the point of saying this ? It as nothing to do with the game, just a badly build F-22, a player creation nothing more
+2@SPAircraftOfficial complicated ? how is Pitch + Roll complicated ?
+2@MRFOXY09 just let people build whatever they want damn, new players like you are boring for being offended by everything
+2and you used one of my screenshots as your profile pic ! amazing !
+2@warbird25 no I didn't post it yet, it will be available in a few weeks
+2