@Graingy yes I did, you forgot but somebody else asked me for the solution on discord, the problem is that I have issues with taking screenshots when the reshade tab is open since it's protected by something that won't let me take screenshots
gg, it's really cool that you succed such a high score, not everyone can do that, most players haven't reach 100 upvotes on a build.
However, do you think you deserve those ? Not being mean or anything, I'm just curious about what you think about it, do you think your build is better than most builds on the front page ? Or that the other 100+ upvotes builds you've seen out here were better or not.
I feel like that (memes builds put aside), most builds getting such an amount of upvotes are generally higher quality.
Good job tho, can't wait to see your next builds, I feel like you wanna do good stuff and that's the only thing that matters for me.
@Luminaria you're giving points for speed ? Most planes don't have the same top speeds that's absurd...
I don't even see a criteria for the build quality or how efficient it is...
@WhaleFall
Acceleration is comedy as much as the top speed is, the plane is flying at +mach even at 50% Throttle. It turns like crazy and even tho I didn't open the debug console to get the numbers I'm sure that it pulls more than 20Gs at almost every turns. It feels like an arcade version of Ace Combat (this game already being arcade)...
You say that you did build this with mobile players in mind but that's not why you didn't put any FT, it's more likely because you don't know anything about it, and that's not a bad thing, I suck at it too, but I do accept criticism and won't pull out stupid excuses when somebody point this out.
Also, a good flight model doesn't always need FT, so that's just an excuse.
On top of that, +850 parts and +3800 perf cost isn't that mobile friendly.
Just accept criticism
Your build is beautiful, it just doesn't fly good.
So looks over performance ? It's an interesting question, I do think that looks are more important than performance, but is it the case in a low parts build ?
@SC2311 It's already really good, and it's visible from far away tht you're really trying to improve your skills and make interesting builds. SimplePlanes has a weird progression curve, so it's okey to have less skills in like making a flight model than making a fuselage.
For the part count, the look of it is already very good, could be improved of course but it's really good, and funkytrees also something else, I'm a total noob at it, but you can seek help everywhere, all the codes I use are maybe by people that's I reached for some help :)
Anyway, keep it up !
(Sorry for my crappy english)
@SC2311 Thanks ! It's not perfect at all but it was the max I could achieve with my skills, still pretty happy with it even tho I'm remember the last two ~ three months weren't fun at all anymore, just focusing over doing ad detail then another then another
@RoastHam9146 I do use one too, that also simulate the delay before blacking/reding-out and the delay of recuperation time, maybe you could be interested in seeing it
Hi ! This builds looks cool, didn't have the time to test it yet so I'm gonna do it later, just being curious, where di you grab that blackout / redout effect ? Didn't see many out there, maybe you even made yours.
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 Yeah well there's the point, you say you did it because you saw it as a fun challenge, that sound like a good motivation, but doing it for upvotes ??
Once again, I don't really care about them, but the point is, why would you care about them ? I mean, everyday I go to work to hget money, but when I do the stuff I like, I don't do it for money, it ain't wasted time tho, and not getting anything from the things I like won't make me stop doing these things. Same goes for SP, why would you try to catch upvotes ? I just don't get it, doing it for upvotes just sound like your playing SP like it was a part time job.
Also, about your PEAs planes, for me they ain't PEA, they're just low part / quality planes.
@TheUltimatePlaneLover Part efficienty has nothing to do with low part count. Part efficienty is being economical in the way you choose and use the parts. Low part count is just a build with a "low" part count.
If your build is sitting at 50 parts, but you used 20 of them to build your landing gears, in ain't efficient, if your build has 1000 parts and you used 50 of them for the landing gears, it's efficient.
@SILVERPANZER great effort and quality isn't becoming less appreciated by the community, actually, as a quality enjoyer, I don't often see quality builds out there today. Most players (you too) thinking that they make awesome stuff don't, it's not a bad thing, but being upset about it toward others is just stupid.
Thanks to the multiplier, we will be able to make aerobatics teams and that's one of the first thing I'll do. Of course I think the very first thing like everybody will just be flying around the new world and check the new parts and possibilities
This build doesn't look like it's the best out there, in fact it isn't. But keep in mind that it is made on a poor performing phone and even so, he had the patience and will to make a lot of details on things such as the landing-gears, cockpit and systems of the control surfaces, which is really appreciated.
The model is beautiful, it's a good replica of the F-16.
But I'm very very disapointed about the flight model, could have been worse of course, but it would have been an awesome build if it was both good looking and have a good flight model.
Awesome build ! Of course I already tried it a few days ago but it's a pleasure to see it finally posted, in an era where quality builds are rare, it's refreshing to see a nice and sweet Mirage 2000D. (I especially love that livery !)
I appreciate the effort you've put into that plane, that's what I call a SP player !
You don't know how much I was waiting for this without even knowing you were building it. The Midge is the build I almost always took while playing multiplayer, awesome to see a new one.
lovely video
+1"You should try Terraria too"
Fantastic work, just mind blowing
+1very cool
+1@Graingy yes I did, you forgot but somebody else asked me for the solution on discord, the problem is that I have issues with taking screenshots when the reshade tab is open since it's protected by something that won't let me take screenshots
+1@Trainzo if you need some screenshots you know who to call !
+1Nice
+1gg, it's really cool that you succed such a high score, not everyone can do that, most players haven't reach 100 upvotes on a build.
However, do you think you deserve those ? Not being mean or anything, I'm just curious about what you think about it, do you think your build is better than most builds on the front page ? Or that the other 100+ upvotes builds you've seen out here were better or not.
I feel like that (memes builds put aside), most builds getting such an amount of upvotes are generally higher quality.
Good job tho, can't wait to see your next builds, I feel like you wanna do good stuff and that's the only thing that matters for me.
+1@F8boa that's good news haha
+1@F8boa his is more stable and user friendly, also over all he did a better job than me in my opinion
+1@Luminaria you're giving points for speed ? Most planes don't have the same top speeds that's absurd...
+1I don't even see a criteria for the build quality or how efficient it is...
@GuardianAerospace I feel like you're the same as I am, 20% of building and 80% of looking at your creation haha
+1@GuardianAerospace it was a joke because the shape isn't that smooth
+1@F8boa by pulling the handles on the side of your sit towards you
+1@WhaleFall
Acceleration is comedy as much as the top speed is, the plane is flying at +mach even at 50% Throttle. It turns like crazy and even tho I didn't open the debug console to get the numbers I'm sure that it pulls more than 20Gs at almost every turns.
It feels like an arcade version of Ace Combat (this game already being arcade)...
You say that you did build this with mobile players in mind but that's not why you didn't put any FT, it's more likely because you don't know anything about it, and that's not a bad thing, I suck at it too, but I do accept criticism and won't pull out stupid excuses when somebody point this out.
Also, a good flight model doesn't always need FT, so that's just an excuse.
On top of that, +850 parts and +3800 perf cost isn't that mobile friendly.
Just accept criticism
Your build is beautiful, it just doesn't fly good.
+1@MrCOPTY just let them be virgins
+1Was the almost naked young lady necessary on the front of the tank ? Also, why hide it on the screenshots ?
+1So looks over performance ? It's an interesting question, I do think that looks are more important than performance, but is it the case in a low parts build ?
+1The plane is what it is, but almost 4 years of dedication on a build deserves an upvote
+1@SC2311 oh bruh that's a shitty situation haha, well don't hesitate to ping me on a post or any forum if you seek some help :)
+1@SC2311 If you want I can give you my discord so if you need any help I could help you
+1@SC2311 It's already really good, and it's visible from far away tht you're really trying to improve your skills and make interesting builds. SimplePlanes has a weird progression curve, so it's okey to have less skills in like making a flight model than making a fuselage.
+1For the part count, the look of it is already very good, could be improved of course but it's really good, and funkytrees also something else, I'm a total noob at it, but you can seek help everywhere, all the codes I use are maybe by people that's I reached for some help :)
Anyway, keep it up !
(Sorry for my crappy english)
@SC2311 Thanks ! It's not perfect at all but it was the max I could achieve with my skills, still pretty happy with it even tho I'm remember the last two ~ three months weren't fun at all anymore, just focusing over doing ad detail then another then another
+1@SyntheticL good old times when my average part count was under 1000 parts
+1@MrCOPTY I'd love to
+1@RoastHam9146 I do use one too, that also simulate the delay before blacking/reding-out and the delay of recuperation time, maybe you could be interested in seeing it
+1Hi ! This builds looks cool, didn't have the time to test it yet so I'm gonna do it later, just being curious, where di you grab that blackout / redout effect ? Didn't see many out there, maybe you even made yours.
+1@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 Yeah well there's the point, you say you did it because you saw it as a fun challenge, that sound like a good motivation, but doing it for upvotes ??
+1Once again, I don't really care about them, but the point is, why would you care about them ? I mean, everyday I go to work to hget money, but when I do the stuff I like, I don't do it for money, it ain't wasted time tho, and not getting anything from the things I like won't make me stop doing these things. Same goes for SP, why would you try to catch upvotes ? I just don't get it, doing it for upvotes just sound like your playing SP like it was a part time job.
Also, about your PEAs planes, for me they ain't PEA, they're just low part / quality planes.
@Pan I only make replicas, but that doesn't mean I made my personality around that, same goes for them.
+1@TheUltimatePlaneLover un-popular opinion : maturity is realising that fun is just the right amount of realism, not a plane that can take 20Gs.
+1@TheUltimatePlaneLover Part efficienty has nothing to do with low part count.
+1Part efficienty is being economical in the way you choose and use the parts.
Low part count is just a build with a "low" part count.
If your build is sitting at 50 parts, but you used 20 of them to build your landing gears, in ain't efficient, if your build has 1000 parts and you used 50 of them for the landing gears, it's efficient.
@SILVERPANZER great effort and quality isn't becoming less appreciated by the community, actually, as a quality enjoyer, I don't often see quality builds out there today. Most players (you too) thinking that they make awesome stuff don't, it's not a bad thing, but being upset about it toward others is just stupid.
+1it happens to be honnest
+1Thanks to the multiplier, we will be able to make aerobatics teams and that's one of the first thing I'll do. Of course I think the very first thing like everybody will just be flying around the new world and check the new parts and possibilities
+1over G ! over G ! over G ! over G !
+1@WinsWings yeah, it was the most epic thing I did in SP haha
+1To all the people that will see this :
This build doesn't look like it's the best out there, in fact it isn't. But keep in mind that it is made on a poor performing phone and even so, he had the patience and will to make a lot of details on things such as the landing-gears, cockpit and systems of the control surfaces, which is really appreciated.
+1@SouthJetAirways I a game where you can literally build everything why would you need mods ?
+1How are you doing this ? By posting a build or a forum post every few days and gaining juste a few points from them.
+1Nice car
+1The model is beautiful, it's a good replica of the F-16.
But I'm very very disapointed about the flight model, could have been worse of course, but it would have been an awesome build if it was both good looking and have a good flight model.
+1That really was a funny moment
+1@c00sm003939 yeah kinda
+1vive la pluie ! à quand un mod pour ajouter des vaches histoire de se sentir en bretagne ?
+1Awesome build ! Of course I already tried it a few days ago but it's a pleasure to see it finally posted, in an era where quality builds are rare, it's refreshing to see a nice and sweet Mirage 2000D. (I especially love that livery !)
+1I appreciate the effort you've put into that plane, that's what I call a SP player !
@Thorne Sure, that's my username : ollielebanania
+1@Thorne haha well I guess somebody did ! I even got some cool screenshots with it while playing multiplayer, maybe I can send you some.
+1You don't know how much I was waiting for this without even knowing you were building it. The Midge is the build I almost always took while playing multiplayer, awesome to see a new one.
+1jolie
+1not all your posts are quality posts tho...
+1@RealMicroZack2024 as MAHADI said, he merged several versions of the F-5, so he can name it the way he wants since it isn't a replica
+1