46.0k ollielebanania Comments

  • F-35E Lightning II 4.9 years ago

    @ChrisPy intersting, thanks. But I keep the fact that so much speed isn't that important (but only for the USA, because they have others planes to play with that can do the job better, of course it will become a pain in the ass if it's the only plane of a country).

  • SU-27 4.9 years ago

    the plane would be a good build if it had less parts, I don't care about a 1200+ parts build but only when the build is flaw less (at least in it's shape), also I don't understand the part count with the low poly cockpit (which isn't a bad thing in itself even if it doesn't really work). You could work on the flight model, the plane take to much Gs and acceleration is too fast.

    +1
  • real plane 4.9 years ago

    @Simps no that """kid""", that's obviously a troll

    +3
  • real plane 4.9 years ago

    nice troll tho

  • F-35E Lightning II 4.9 years ago

    @MrEarth that's just rude I guess, don't be dumb man

  • F-35E Lightning II 4.9 years ago

    @Homemade1 yeah but he reached more than Mach 1 at sea level so the plane will only be faster with altitude...

  • F-35E Lightning II 4.9 years ago

    @ChrisPy yeah ok but the point is that his plane does reach the Mach speed even though he said it doesn't. Also the F35 don't need to be fast, this plane is made for beyond visual range combats, the contreversy about this plane is more around it's developement.

  • F-35E Lightning II 4.9 years ago

    drama, the plane does actually reach Mach 1 pretty easely, this isn't a problem but don't say it doesn't. I also want to say that ok it's a game and a """"fictional"""""" version of the plane but it's still a F35 so a replica and you can't make a real plane fly like a space craft in star wars

    +3
  • Focke-Wulf Ta 152 H-1 4.9 years ago

    @WileECoyote Fock-Wulf is a brand not a plane, this plane is a Ta 152H (go and check images of the plane and you'll see that the wings does look like this). Don't worry I know how to make replicas ;) also do not say to someone that his build is trash, even more when your builds really could be trash from my view.

  • F/A-18E Super Hornet "Maverick" 4.9 years ago

    @Red0Bull don't get cocky tho, I'm not even looking for a Super Hornet, I just said that a plane without ailerons is bruh

  • Focke-Wulf Ta 152 H-1 4.9 years ago

    @WileECoyote yeah it is :)

  • Dassault Mirage 2000 4.9 years ago

    @UltraLight fun ? This plane is one of the hardest to make

  • Supermarine Spitfire (Cinematic) 4.9 years ago

    @UltraLight only on the first versions tho

    +1
  • Focke-Wulf Ta 152 H-1 4.9 years ago

    @QuickNils did you read the description ?

  • Dassault Mirage 2000 4.9 years ago

    @UltraLight even I make one right now

  • Dassault Mirage 2000 4.9 years ago

    @WSindustries even if the plane can't do a cobra in real life

  • Curtiss P40 Warhawk 4.9 years ago

    @pura it's ok, my name is just ugly with one l x)

  • Curtiss P40 Warhawk 4.9 years ago

    Some people seem to forget that this game is called "SimplePlanes" and this build is perfect in terms of low part count, simplicity but well made details, wings and general form. Just wait for this guy to get some experience and better stuff and he will make even more amazing builds ! (I already have your plane that's why I will not download it here).

    +2
  • Dassault Mirage 2000 4.9 years ago

    people are making Mirages now

  • F/A-18E Super Hornet "Maverick" 4.9 years ago

    @Chrisk1993 some planes don't need them, but when making a replica of a plane that have some for me it's a must have.

  • SCREENSHOTS of my latest build. 4.9 years ago

    @CartoonCat thx

  • UB. 700 Leviathan (Collaboration with tucan) 4.9 years ago

    @Hardy1 Well everything seems ok with the map when I'm playing it.

  • UB. 700 Leviathan (Collaboration with tucan) 4.9 years ago

    @Hardy1 Stork Island and Kumamantanga Archipelago

  • UB. 700 Leviathan (Collaboration with tucan) 4.9 years ago

    @DonaldAs2121 points does no more matter, that's why people should stop running after upvotes and just build amazing builds like this one !

  • F/A-18E Super Hornet "Maverick" 4.9 years ago

    @Homemade1 next time you could put structural wings in both sides, so when you fold the wings the flight model will change, this build would be even better with this and ailerons (a plane without ailerons is a sin)

  • F/A-18E Super Hornet "Maverick" 4.9 years ago

    the plane has no ailerons...

  • Focke-Wulf Ta 152 H-1 4.9 years ago

    @Mobileplayer1029 I did it

  • Spiral Nose ! 4.9 years ago

    @Mobileplayer1029 I posted screenshots damn in the comments showing how it's made, I'll pin them

  • Focke-Wulf Ta-156 Wespe 4.9 years ago

    @CRJ900Pilot they must have made a mistake but it's ok, it works and it's the only thing that matters

  • Focke-Wulf Ta-156 Wespe 4.9 years ago

    this plane looks so nice, amazing job ! (and you used my technic for nose spiral nose cones that cool :)) ) Also, your plane has two engines so making an anti-torque wasn't necessary, you could just have made the two cones not spining in the same way, like in real life. Other than that the plane flys great, the details make it look realistic and I'm not being objective because I love the Ta 154

  • Dassault Mirage IIIC [70k Build] 4.9 years ago

    @Hedero bruh yes you're right, my bad. I really have to sleep how could I have forgot that

  • Dassault Mirage IIIC [70k Build] 4.9 years ago

    @ChrisPy only that ? I'm making one too and the drag is better around +2000. Also yes the Mirage had flaps.

  • Dassault Mirage IIIC [70k Build] 4.9 years ago

    @Hedero I think that he wanted to say that there is no trim

  • MX Jet Engine Test 4.9 years ago

    @CartoonCat of course I'm being rude, at first I was trying to help, then you came here for no reason just because you were upset that I critised your build, and FIVE DAYS LATER you apologise ? Nah you can ask who the hell you want I'm not rude at all, but things like this is too much. Also saying that you thought it was an insult isn't an apologize. I don't think we have to talk more. Have a nice day and good luck in your next builds.

  • MX Jet Engine Test 4.9 years ago

    @CartoonCat five days later....seriously ? like don't you have anything better to do ? Why are you comming back ? That sound so stupid. And even if it was an insult (which wasn't, you must be dumb to see insults in a message like mine) why would you answer ? ("it won't lift"...first it does, second this build is crap, and it's because I made a mistake by uploading it that I say to other players to not post builds that can't fly, even if this one can somehow).

  • Mirage IIIC 1 4.9 years ago

    @KangaKangaTheRedNosedRoo true.

    +1
  • Mirage IIIC 1 5.0 years ago

    @KangaKangaTheRedNosedRoo Well yeah the comment section is here so users can comment the plane, maybe it seems rude from your point of view but for us it's just normal, we also have people that only point out issues on our builds and thanks to this our next builds will not have those issues :)

    +1
  • Mirage IIIC 1 5.0 years ago

    @LoafOfBread oh in the comments ! My internet connection is way to bad to upload reviews...sadly.

  • Mirage IIIC 1 5.0 years ago

    @Hedero I feel like I'm the only one to see them, do you have discord ? So I can send you screenshots of what I'm talking about.

  • Mirage IIIC 1 5.0 years ago

    @KangaKangaTheRedNosedRoo french reviews ? Wasn't I the only french guy to review the plane ? Also being critical isn't a bad thing, if I take the time to make a review it's because I want to help him, give some advices. Also I'm not more "critical all the sudden", it's just that I know this plane more than others so of course I have more things to say. And yeah it's a game, but stop with this excuse, if you want to make a replica you make a replica, otherways you make a fictional version ( which is cool too ).

    +1
  • A super rudimentary guide on how to make the basic gauges (will be updated) 5.0 years ago

    @vcharng maybe, but I tried your FT line and it doesn't do the same thing

  • Mirage IIIC 1 5.0 years ago

    @LoafOfBread on the very rear of the plane, just under the vertical stab, there is two little red stabs

  • Mirage IIIC 1 5.0 years ago

    @Fliegerkerlchen yeah it's SimplePlane : A GAME. But if you decide to make a replica, you MAKE A REPLICA or you don't put the replica tag on it. And ok cobras are cool (they are cool on a plane able to do it humhum), but how do you explain the micro stabs at the rear, the spics, the weird concave or the fake delta ? sorry to be a little rude, but this Mirage IIIc, one of my favourite planes, is not very good. Especially when knowing what this guy is able to do.

  • Mirage IIIC 1 5.0 years ago

    Me, a french guy, is very offended by this mirage that can do a cobra, and why the hell do the build have spics and micro stabs at the rear ???

    +1
  • XF-11 5.0 years ago

    Jundroo : makes a game where people will be able to share builds
    HappyFeetWhyshouldi : ok let's make a 4000 parts plane

    ok so let's be serious two minutes, the build is awesome, it does look like the real plane, details are unbelievable just as the custom landing gears, spoilers, control surfaces ect....This build is for sure really REALLY good. BUT there are some flaws : first the part count (yes some people will say "blablabla it's not that bad" but it is !) I know there is a lot of details and custom parts but absolutely NO PART ECONOMY ! Which is a shame for a plane with this ammount of details, for exemple in your jauges each line is ONE part, but you can make two and up to four lines with one part...Also the tail doesn't really look like how it should where the fuselage and the vertical stabilizer meet which is unfortunate for a build of this quality. (And I'm going to say it again, so much parts is great to show what you can do, it's like a piece of art, but high part count doesn't mean good build)
    However don't think that I find your build bad, it's magnificent ! Better than a lot of builds :))

    +1
  • 1963 C2 Corvette 5.0 years ago

    why not making this a sucessor ? Just for upvotes ?

  • Focke-Wulf Ta 152 H-1 5.0 years ago

    @60021156 well of course the details will die but the plane will still be pretty good looking

  • Focke-Wulf Ta 152 H-1 5.0 years ago

    @Mobileplayer1029 I could

  • MX Jet Engine Test 5.0 years ago

    @JumpingSpider I don't really care :) I was just trying to help you, but you commented on this post which is already pretty old, so your goal wasn't to help me, just to send hate because you can't accept critisism. Go and delete my comment :) I deleted yours so the drama don't keep going, you will delete mine for absolutely nothing but rejecting help :)))))