97.0k flyingsteve88 Comments

  • Lockheed Martin AC-130H Gunship 4.6 years ago

    NICE

  • Sound Barrier 1.0 (no mod) 4.8 years ago

    这么高级?现在已经可以用速度范围来input转轴了?

  • Concorde SST 4.9 years ago

    @Rexxtasd @Natedog120705 Thanks!!

  • Concorde SST 4.9 years ago

    @WalrusAircraft @grantflys @Jetliner101 Thanks!

    +1
  • IT-6-2MK1 Walking Robot 4.9 years ago

    Pretty cool

  • Concorde SST 4.9 years ago

    @BogdanX Could you improve it according to your advice? I will really appreciate that :)

    +7
  • Concorde SST 4.9 years ago

    @Ryn176 what! You saw me, it seems that I can only destroy you.

  • Concorde SST 4.9 years ago

    @QingyuZhou 正是,前几天去的

  • Concorde SST 4.9 years ago

    @toxicgamer88 @ainanen Thanks

  • Concorde SST 4.9 years ago

    @TheFantasticTyphoon @ColonelStriker Thank you guys, but the problem is the Dev cannot feature someone who's higher than 25K

  • Concorde SST 4.9 years ago

    @Lyra @Jfalix @Georgereese1113 Thanks!

  • Concorde SST 4.9 years ago

    @YourWife Thanks for your patient advice, it helps me a lot to improve

    I've now downloaded and flown it, and I'm ready to give my critique.
    Pros:
    Absolutely stunning detail and livery.
    Thanks
    The construction and physical shape is beautiful, very well made, and stays very true to the original design
    The mechanical part of this aircraft is truly incredible. Using as many as over 100 rotators on an aircraft really shows the amount of effort put into it.
    The afterburner exhaust looks great
    The yawing motion doesn't roll the plane and its actually effective at turning

    Cons:
    The weight is entirely inaccurate, should be roughly 150 tons
    that's right, I did not think too much about the weight
    It's also larger than the real thing, which is 202 ft long, 40 ft tall, and with an 84 ft wingspan
    Actually you can see all the part were double-size than the usual, I make the entire plane larger when I almost done
    The weight causes it to accelerate multiple times faster than a Tesla car
    right, because the VTOL engine is so powerful, but it is necessary to maintain a high cruise speed, I will not appreciate opening the afterburner all the time. In fact, I mix the power of the VTOL engine with the power of the ordinary small jet engine to achieve the best effect.
    Completely stops when engine power is cut
    drug, drug can be scary in such a huge aircraft
    There's no suspension at all in the landing gear
    this is true, but also not true. The front landing gear has one. When I try to add a suspension system to the rear wheel, it always jitters, it might not endure that pressure, so I have to cancel it and use six pistons to stabilize it (three of it on each side, I hide it but you can still find it) and deal with the problem.
    Roll rate is painfully slow, had a hard time adjusting my orientation to land
    yes, but I think the roll should not be so sensitive especially on a low wing-span passenger plane

  • Concorde SST 4.9 years ago

    Nitpicks and small issues:
    There are no navigation lights on the wing
    you mean the blinking light? It has on each side of the wing, and even one on the tail
    The trailing edge at the base of the vertical stabilizer is flat instead of like it is at the tip
    The landing lights that fold out stay out when 7 is turned off, an issue I've encountered and know how to fix
    I do not have extra Activity group to control the folding light, so I use the landing gear group, that is why I called it "Landing Gear Linkage System"
    The control surfaces don't entirely line up with the wing where they attach
    yes, especially on the edge of the wing, I noticed that

    Overall, you did an amazing job on building and shaping it, but part of a SimplePlanes build is the flight experience. Paying attention to that is important for those who download and want to fly it. I do understand being finished with this project you probably don't have much motivation to work on it more, and i very much understand that. So I'll offer my own revision based on my critique, if you allow me to.
    well...you could make a try, but I have hidden all the rotators, it might be even harder to make a change based on it than build another plane

  • Concorde SST 4.9 years ago

    @TheXDimension32 I am going to write an essay about dat, please wait for few days

  • Concorde SST 4.9 years ago

    @GabetheDoge sorry about dat...it shouldn’t be happen

  • Concorde SST 4.9 years ago

    @DeidaraEnterprises thanks

  • Concorde SST 4.9 years ago

    @TheXDimension32 Differential Rotators Tech, I think it is not a new tech. But I discovered it by myself

  • This is the coolest thing that I have ever done! 4.9 years ago

    @WIZARD2017 帅啊,看样子能垂直起降?

  • This is the coolest thing that I have ever done! 4.9 years ago

    @WIZARD2017 诶嘿嘿(๑≧∀≦๑)

  • UAV-Dragonfly 4.9 years ago

    @SakuraSaku 顺便说一下,这个驾驶舱是真的强,我造AATIS的时候也搞过类似的,知道很难弄,尤其是细节部分

  • Concorde SST 4.9 years ago

    @WIZARD2017 这里

  • Concorde SST 4.9 years ago

    @WIZARD2017 嗯嗯,我当天还穿了一件协和的衣服呢c(ˆωˆc)

  • Concorde SST 4.9 years ago

    @Marine Thanks

  • Concorde SST 4.9 years ago

    @ThomasRoderick Just download it, and see how landing gear works, you will like it ;D

    +1
  • Chicken,you are so beautiful 4.9 years ago

    @YL 嘤嘤嘤 (,,•́ . •̀,,)

  • Concorde SST 4.9 years ago

    @Insmallsky 因为在超高速巡航的时候陀螺仪稳定需要更大的力所以在低速的时候稳定性就过于多余从而导致在升力无法维持姿态时陀螺仪依旧能稳住机身并且保持一定的操纵性再加上本身的阻力可以使得速度无限趋近于零最终就可以达到类似于垂直降落的效果当然在现实中是不可能的啦

  • Concorde SST 4.9 years ago

    @PlanefunJr Thanks

  • Chicken,you are so beautiful 4.9 years ago

    @YL 嘤

    +1
  • Concorde SST 4.9 years ago

    @SakuraSaku 啊哈,我也是呢

  • Concorde SST 4.9 years ago

    @Insmallsky 没错,你按着6还能垂直降落航母呢’(°ー°〃)

  • Concorde Logo Package 4.9 years ago

    @CRJ900Pilot I try, I try

  • Concorde SST 4.9 years ago

    @SakuraSaku 大佬回坑?Σ(っ °Д °;)っ

  • UAV-Dragonfly 4.9 years ago

    麻雀!肥麻雀!

    +1
  • Concorde SST 4.9 years ago

    @PlanefunJr @Jerba Good, good, this is what I expect

  • Concorde SST 4.9 years ago

    @Jerba one and a half month

  • Concorde SST 4.9 years ago

    @Axartar @grizzlitn Thanks

    +1
  • Concorde SST 4.9 years ago

    @WarHawk95 Merci.

  • Concorde SST 4.9 years ago

    @Gameboi14 is that the answer you expect?

  • Concorde SST 4.9 years ago

    @Viper3000ad I really enjoyed typing a long intro with lots of detail, but it takes time

  • Concorde SST 4.9 years ago

    @Blue0Bull anyway, thanks for your upvote!

  • Concorde SST 4.9 years ago

    @JamesBleriot yup

  • Concorde SST 4.9 years ago

    @logizAircrafts I am truly insane, u r right!

  • Concorde SST 4.9 years ago

    @xXRaindropXx Thanks

  • Concorde SST 4.9 years ago

    @Gameboi14 one and a half month?

  • Concorde SST 4.9 years ago

    @ChiyomiAnzai Sure, best creation worth the best description ;)

  • Concorde SST 4.9 years ago

    @LlamaIndustries @TheFantasticTyphoon @CRJ900Pilot Thanks

  • Concorde SST 4.9 years ago

    @BaconRoll right, I think it just a coincidence "(P=2707, reminds me of the Boeing-2707, another great project at the same period :D)"

    +2
  • Concorde SST 4.9 years ago

    @BACconcordepilot Thanks, BTW, I lav your name XD

  • Concorde SST 4.9 years ago

    @Roswell Thanks, I tried to use a lot of parts to achieve the best effect, hope you like it!

  • Concorde SST 4.9 years ago

    @Kitten777 @YourWife Thanks