@SDmak Mostly it's about correct cg placement; thrust amount and weight. When it comes to flight models, it's recommended to use some FT.
Use a well-placed airbrake part with FT to enforce more drag when needed. The further it is from the CoM - the more leverage it'll have. If it's in front of CoM - it'll aid in turning (at the cost of becoming more and more unstable), while rear placed airbrake won't.
The rest is pure trial and error.
@CarGuy32SP More planes with attitude hold? Yeah, now that I know how it works I can implement it into my future planes, it's just too good of a feature to be missing out on.
One of simpleplanes.com rules say: "Don't advertise Discord servers in posts or comments".
On top of that, for the server to be "legal", it needs to meet certain requirements, you can check them out here. I don't have a moderation team, and it's likely that I won't find one.
... so yeah. This server exists though.I am not advertising anything here, people who seriously want to join will find a way to.
@Object775blyat The "50/50" list isn't a part of the normal "TODO" list. That means that there will be no tags when planes from "50/50" list are uploaded
@MSRM That's a nice low-part build! :3
I was aiming for Zero's pea mig 29 in terms of the part count, and also "improving" it's looks as much as it was possible. On that note, btw, I think that we came even (70 parts / 70 parts) on clean configurations, so that's pretty neat :3
@ORIENTALAAA XML. The code for engines is throttle + TAS/700 or something like that, which means, that I'll get around double the thrust with every 700 m/s that I go.
@SuperSuperTheSylph planning on making another 29 with even less parts, as well as a much simpler viper :3
+1@TheCommentaryGuy Should be fixed now. Thanks for pointing this out :3
@IQinventory Off the internet
+1@IQinventory Fictional
+1.. 10?
@SuperSuperTheSylph I'll be looking forward to it :3
+1@SuperSuperTheSylph You can't be gold for so long, you deserve plat :3
+1@SuperSuperTheSylph :3
@SuperSuperTheSylph oh nice, haven't noticed that :3
+1@SilverStar oooohh yeah, i see now. Thanks for the advice :3
@SilverStar what do you mean?
@YourlocalfoxSP read the craft's description
the goober!
@SDmak Mostly it's about correct cg placement; thrust amount and weight. When it comes to flight models, it's recommended to use some FT.
Use a well-placed airbrake part with FT to enforce more drag when needed. The further it is from the CoM - the more leverage it'll have. If it's in front of CoM - it'll aid in turning (at the cost of becoming more and more unstable), while rear placed airbrake won't.
+1The rest is pure trial and error.
@CarGuy32SP More planes with attitude hold? Yeah, now that I know how it works I can implement it into my future planes, it's just too good of a feature to be missing out on.
+1omg this thing is so cutee! i love it :3
+1Cute thing! :3
+1@AmericanAerospace yes
@Luchibat6 yep
Regarding the discord server...
One of simpleplanes.com rules say: "Don't advertise Discord servers in posts or comments".
On top of that, for the server to be "legal", it needs to meet certain requirements, you can check them out here. I don't have a moderation team, and it's likely that I won't find one.
... so yeah. This server exists though. I am not advertising anything here, people who seriously want to join will find a way to.
@Susimposter
@keiyronelleavgeek566
@TheNewSPplayer
@Boeing727200F
@Amspro
@sKyCoS
@Zerocario
@Maverick09
@danixvi
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26
@F8boa
+1@MTFUE11
@Object775blyat
@DeeganWithABazooka
+1@Halcyon215
@IQinventory
@DRVST4669
@Bugati87
@PannerTerkins
@DominickM
@Nenormal
@Luky44
@EagleMan010
@dekanii
@TheRealGoober
@BOSKnight
@Erionh
@Chip33
@SuperSuperTheSylph
@SDmak
@PrussianAirWorks
@M109simp
@Petropavlovsk101
@TheUltimatePlaneLover
@ReichRichDeutsch
@Lo9483
@PhantomBoltSP
@Object775blyat The "50/50" list isn't a part of the normal "TODO" list. That means that there will be no tags when planes from "50/50" list are uploaded
+1@PlayboiCartiOfficial oh my god, real Playboy carti hello nice to meet you I am a fan of your work please come to Lublin next year🙏
@rickofrolls It already has two of them
@rickofrolls That's so true, for some reason two GAU-8's couldn't fit in there. I'll investigate this misunderstanding...
@rickofrolls Yep, it's not designed as an ultramaneuverable dogfighter. Such a shame, isn't it?
@rickofrolls ikr
@SkyboardAviation Reshade
@SuperSuperTheSylph ^_^
+1Neat! :3
+1@MSRM That's a nice low-part build! :3
+1I was aiming for Zero's pea mig 29 in terms of the part count, and also "improving" it's looks as much as it was possible. On that note, btw, I think that we came even (70 parts / 70 parts) on clean configurations, so that's pretty neat :3
@ORIENTALAAA XML. The code for engines is throttle + TAS/700 or something like that, which means, that I'll get around double the thrust with every 700 m/s that I go.
+1@SuperSuperTheSylph Oh, okay
+1@SuperSuperTheSylph Oh nice :D What specifically? :3
+1@SuperSuperTheSylph thanks for... what?
+1@SuperSuperTheSylph ty! :3 <3
+1@crone Why? The train engines are really heavy, it just won't take off!
@SuperSuperTheSylph They're disturbing the flow iirc, but I don't remember for what purpose exactly
+1