Looks: 9/10. Looks very nice, kind of like a cooler version of the old vertigo. I like the smoothness between the wings and the fuselage.
Function: 8/10. Accelerates fast, really hard to VTOL because of where the CoM is so far back, but if you moved it forward it would mess up the flight model.
Ingenuity: 9/10. Very good use of structural panels, the only problem is that the panel behind the cockpit is asymmetrical. I don't think it does anything, but it's kind of weird. I liked the drop tanks!
Build Quality: 9/10. Again, weird asymmetrical thing, I'm not entirely sure why the engines aren't attached to the fuselage and the wings do flex quite a bit with the engines, but it's not terrible.
Total: 35/40
Looks: 5/10. It's not very fancy, only 27 parts, very little detailing.
Function: 5/10. Difficult to fly, not realistic in terms of a light twin, most irl light twins aren't taildraggers.
Ingenuity: 4/10. There's nothing special about this and it's not exactly difficult to come up with. Doesn't use any fancy techniques.
Build quality: 5/10. Again, not detailed and frankly uninteresting. I think you could have made something much better had you taken advantage of the deadline length.
Total: 19/40
Looks: 9/10. Looks like an F-16! Especially from the top. I think there could have been a few more things you could have done like paint, but overall it's really good.
Function: 8/10. It's not supersonic, but pretty maneuverable and fun to fly. A pain to land because of the narrow wheels though lol.
Ingenuity: 10/10. You did a great job replicating an F-16 with only blocks.
Build Quality: 9/10. I think this is a really good plane, but the performance could be better. I understand that it's difficult to have 3 engines inside, but it is possible.
Total: 36/40
@EngineerOtaku yeah lol. The second engine was nice, idk if you could have fit three. It’s a nice plane regardless.
egg boi
May I use this for screenshots with my MiG-19?
Nooooooooo I was going to make one of these
car go nyoom
I'm gonna sink this
@Destroyerz117 lol oof
Nice nose gear first landing
oooooo
@PapaKernels yes
Simp
@CaptainMilk yes
The diameter of the Il-18's fuselage is 3.5m not 3.7 lol
@realSavageMan Lol the nose shape is a bit different so I was wondering if it would fit
@BaconAircraft lmao
Could I make an Il-18 with this?
Welcome to SPFC
I'm like 99% sure it's still very active
We have these but they're just excavators on barges used for dredging
Looks: 9/10. Looks very nice, kind of like a cooler version of the old vertigo. I like the smoothness between the wings and the fuselage.
Function: 8/10. Accelerates fast, really hard to VTOL because of where the CoM is so far back, but if you moved it forward it would mess up the flight model.
Ingenuity: 9/10. Very good use of structural panels, the only problem is that the panel behind the cockpit is asymmetrical. I don't think it does anything, but it's kind of weird. I liked the drop tanks!
Build Quality: 9/10. Again, weird asymmetrical thing, I'm not entirely sure why the engines aren't attached to the fuselage and the wings do flex quite a bit with the engines, but it's not terrible.
Total: 35/40
Looks: 5/10. It's not very fancy, only 27 parts, very little detailing.
Function: 5/10. Difficult to fly, not realistic in terms of a light twin, most irl light twins aren't taildraggers.
Ingenuity: 4/10. There's nothing special about this and it's not exactly difficult to come up with. Doesn't use any fancy techniques.
Build quality: 5/10. Again, not detailed and frankly uninteresting. I think you could have made something much better had you taken advantage of the deadline length.
Total: 19/40
Looks: 9/10. Looks like an F-16! Especially from the top. I think there could have been a few more things you could have done like paint, but overall it's really good.
Function: 8/10. It's not supersonic, but pretty maneuverable and fun to fly. A pain to land because of the narrow wheels though lol.
Ingenuity: 10/10. You did a great job replicating an F-16 with only blocks.
Build Quality: 9/10. I think this is a really good plane, but the performance could be better. I understand that it's difficult to have 3 engines inside, but it is possible.
Total: 36/40
@Kipo I built my Sukhoi T-4, A321NEO and Tu-124 on IOS
sus
@Sweppingkid29withsp Neither do I
tonk
Ducc
@Sweppingkid29withsp It got dramatic
@Sweppingkid29withsp It was spotlighted by a bunch of people
This is fake and cringe!
Fox 4
@Sweppingkid29withsp It became a meme a while ago because some idiots thought it would be funny to spam upvote it
Only 1 more?
Very nice!
@Sweppingkid29withsp No the moderators disabled commenting and hid the upvotes
@TheNightmareCompany hmm
@Tookan Me and the boys using corn-based ethanol
@Stinky Me with a Bugatti Chiron
Isn't this a LeMans car? Looks awesome
@tsampoy Still it has those diesel engines no biofuels
This will occasionally happen, usually when I'm using MP. I don't loose progress though
Why so many oil tankers those are bad for the environment bruh
@AmaeroLLC ok
Aye, time to go a-whalin!
@JoeriV ok
@ChrisPy yes
The fuselages are like 90% the same
Weapons didn't exist in alpha
where's your final entry?
You just reuploaded the base plane but ok