odd. That's not supposed to happen.
if you have SP, you can go to the web and click on the "Download" button. It'd open SP and download the craft right then and there.
Perhaps you have desktop view on?
@QuiteInactiveWhiteBread
I'm surprised you've gone this far without knowing how to ft
the simple way to start learning ft is through the official guides by WNP himself, it may be slightly outdated but it explains nearly everything in a very simple manner for beginners.
but either way, yes, that's the baseline of the code.
@QuiteInactiveWhiteBread
sorry, I get easily annoyed sometimes
I shouldn't expect everyone to be at the same level as I am
either way, the nozzle doesn't move it's thrust directions, only converging and diverging as a way to concentrate the air coming out of the engine to give it slightly more power
the petals move, the base of the nozzle itself doesn't is what I'm saying
and yes, that's the entire code. you can modify it however you want, make it only move in certain conditions, and make it move in a certain way corresponding to the input, but other than that, the baseline code is just that.
@RealMicroZackSP
trying to act real tough now, are you?
I do agree that I was pretty aggressive, but never did I say I hate you or anything. T'was but a simple question. You're getting the attention you asked for and was proven wrong in a positive light, are you happy now? Because you should be.
I also want to add the fact that you pointing out who would possibly hate you in public does sound very attention seeking. Saying "this guy probably hates me" in a public space open in front of everyone makes you look like you're only asking it even further.
@Monarchii
I'm pretty sure you don't need it, but to be safe I used a detacher too.
and instead of attaching the top to the aircraft I attach the back to the aircraft
the question I wanna ask is, on one side, I want to keep making mini-replicas, while the other, to tone it down and make them AI-friendlily spawnable, thoughts..?
For me, the main appeal in PEA building is making an aircraft's flight model as realistic as possible while toning down the details to keep it AI-spawnable, although not too far as to sacrifice it's model's accuracy.
The more dissapointing thing about it is that nobody seems to be seeing this too, and proceed to make PEAs of... Questionable quality.
I frankly never cared much about liveries, labels, nor the little nooks and crannies. To me, they add way too much cost to an otherwise fine looking aircraft, and it defeats the purpose of PEA.
but then again I make pea so I can spam replicas into my makeshift dogfights so, you do what you want lol
@ShiroNeko
Interesting. It's not showing in my side of things, so maybe it's about the image hosting site itself.
But anyway, me personally would recommend Imgbb. I'm not sure if you are using Imgbb, but it works perfectly for me and I haven't had much issues about other people telling me it doesn't show on their side.
few corrections:
- the Su-27 has only 1 control surface on each of it's wings, this one control surface act both as a flap and aileron
- the Su-27 is not the Flanker-C. It is the Flanker-B
Hey, love to see other people actively flying the T/F-44B, however I will have to ask you to take this page down.
I have reported this post for plagiarism, and lack of creative improvement. Which violates the rules of the site for tweaking aircraft. You have proceeded to take my aircraft, recolor paletted it, and proceeded to label it as another name for another aircraft. Upon trying the aircraft for myself, I saw no improvement/change in the airframe. Be it flight model, weapon, interior, nor livery.
All I ask is for you to stop blatantly plagiarizing people's work, and start making your own aircraft with your own hands. Thank you.
@Graingy
to me, it isn't about showing the appeal to the masses, but rather just a thing I enjoy making myself.
I still make replicas, it's still extremely fun to fly an aircraft I love the most. And the better part of it is I can just make my own livery without having to bother catering to other people's build style.
that's only really my main appeal, and also the fact that nobody really makes simcadey feel to aircrafts I think it's just cool
Aurum Aerial Industries honestly was supposed to be a placeholder for an old 5th gen concept I had made
the thing turned out to be pretty garbo so I decided to continue on the replica grind
it wasn't until the block war challenge that I thought "making fictional is kinda neat."
so I started making some.
here I am.
Aurum Aerial Industries is still relatively nameless, since it doesn't have a particular place to call home, but short answer about who they are is they just make planes. For god knows who
you have no idea the things I'm capable of doing
omg tiranei!!!!!!
taek dwown junro moderstoes nouw!!!!
@TheFlyingGoose
not really?
it's just the game trying to force it back to normal values
some parts actually do this
the game doesn't like you putting a value higher than maximum for certain parts so it resets whenever you reload it
odd. That's not supposed to happen.
if you have SP, you can go to the web and click on the "Download" button. It'd open SP and download the craft right then and there.
Perhaps you have desktop view on?
@QuiteInactiveWhiteBread
I'm surprised you've gone this far without knowing how to ft
the simple way to start learning ft is through the official guides by WNP himself, it may be slightly outdated but it explains nearly everything in a very simple manner for beginners.
but either way, yes, that's the baseline of the code.
@ShinyGemsBro
fair
@ShinyGemsBro
there's a reason why I made a lo-part version
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26
@YarisSedan
@QuiteInactiveWhiteBread
sorry, I get easily annoyed sometimes
I shouldn't expect everyone to be at the same level as I am
either way, the nozzle doesn't move it's thrust directions, only converging and diverging as a way to concentrate the air coming out of the engine to give it slightly more power
the petals move, the base of the nozzle itself doesn't is what I'm saying
and yes, that's the entire code. you can modify it however you want, make it only move in certain conditions, and make it move in a certain way corresponding to the input, but other than that, the baseline code is just that.
@QuiteInactiveWhiteBread
what am I supposed to answer with?
fuckin, just nozzle?
I thought "no TVC" was clear enough
damn
bro left and came back casually
heresy
reporting this to the mods
imagine being a 2 yaer old smh
god I wish I had the patience and device to do this
@RealMicroZackSP
trying to act real tough now, are you?
I do agree that I was pretty aggressive, but never did I say I hate you or anything. T'was but a simple question. You're getting the attention you asked for and was proven wrong in a positive light, are you happy now? Because you should be.
I also want to add the fact that you pointing out who would possibly hate you in public does sound very attention seeking. Saying "this guy probably hates me" in a public space open in front of everyone makes you look like you're only asking it even further.
@RealMicroZackSP
exactly what I'm saying.
@Cat4eva
sucks
@Cat4eva
see it for yourself
@STEVEN124
oh ok
who?
look ma it's my plane
@ch3ggo5
the code normally works on the
inputvariable.why is there two of them
am I missing something
aw yis
and then there's me
the vtuber fan
sounds like a hassle
I've made several guided bombs, including my own fictionals so you can just look at them on my planes
@Monarchii
I'm pretty sure you don't need it, but to be safe I used a detacher too.
and instead of attaching the top to the aircraft I attach the back to the aircraft
@Monarchii
just a missile with no lock cone, basically maxTargetingAngle set to 0
For me, the main appeal in PEA building is making an aircraft's flight model as realistic as possible while toning down the details to keep it AI-spawnable, although not too far as to sacrifice it's model's accuracy.
The more dissapointing thing about it is that nobody seems to be seeing this too, and proceed to make PEAs of... Questionable quality.
I frankly never cared much about liveries, labels, nor the little nooks and crannies. To me, they add way too much cost to an otherwise fine looking aircraft, and it defeats the purpose of PEA.
but then again I make pea so I can spam replicas into my makeshift dogfights so, you do what you want lol
@ShiroNeko
Interesting. It's not showing in my side of things, so maybe it's about the image hosting site itself.
But anyway, me personally would recommend Imgbb. I'm not sure if you are using Imgbb, but it works perfectly for me and I haven't had much issues about other people telling me it doesn't show on their side.
shiro are you still using discord for image hosting
because it dissapeared
hot damn
I'm beat
few corrections:
- the Su-27 has only 1 control surface on each of it's wings, this one control surface act both as a flap and aileron
- the Su-27 is not the Flanker-C. It is the Flanker-B
Hey, love to see other people actively flying the T/F-44B, however I will have to ask you to take this page down.
I have reported this post for plagiarism, and lack of creative improvement. Which violates the rules of the site for tweaking aircraft. You have proceeded to take my aircraft, recolor paletted it, and proceeded to label it as another name for another aircraft. Upon trying the aircraft for myself, I saw no improvement/change in the airframe. Be it flight model, weapon, interior, nor livery.
All I ask is for you to stop blatantly plagiarizing people's work, and start making your own aircraft with your own hands. Thank you.
@Rb2h
well, yeah because I myself use mobile low physics.
Having trouble in reading what's on the HUD and HMD? Click onto these two links down below to look at the symbology!
HUD Symbology
HMD Symbology
Oh yeah, forgot to credit.
@Kikikokikomarumaru15000
thanks for the fix bud lmao
@TheMouse
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26
@ImAcarperson
@rorrE
@GuardianAerospace
@SPsidearm
@126
@SuperSuperTheSylph
@PrussianAirlines
@SPAirForce
@Vikram123
@calli3
@TheUltimatePlaneLover
@Graingy
that also brings up another point
I just don't download people's stuff lol.
@Graingy
to me, it isn't about showing the appeal to the masses, but rather just a thing I enjoy making myself.
I still make replicas, it's still extremely fun to fly an aircraft I love the most. And the better part of it is I can just make my own livery without having to bother catering to other people's build style.
that's only really my main appeal, and also the fact that nobody really makes simcadey feel to aircrafts I think it's just cool
@Graingy
yeah
Aurum Aerial Industries honestly was supposed to be a placeholder for an old 5th gen concept I had made
the thing turned out to be pretty garbo so I decided to continue on the replica grind
it wasn't until the block war challenge that I thought "making fictional is kinda neat."
so I started making some.
here I am.
Aurum Aerial Industries is still relatively nameless, since it doesn't have a particular place to call home, but short answer about who they are is they just make planes. For god knows who
@Cadvalto
that's fair.
I will agree, it's way too blurry
also as a general rule of thumb, it's a much better result to only blur the background, if you plan on putting the blur effect on your pics.
how is this 700 parts already