@F8boa
For the time being, that'll be a negative.
Considering how this aircraft had already brought my device to it's near limit, adding more features, especially the more complicated ones will be a bit too taxing for even my Redmi Note 13.
If you want however, feel free to add it yourself! Just be sure to credit by either leaving the Auto-Credit on, or by leaving my name somewhere in the description. Just don't claim it as your own self-made creation.
@F16xl
but like...
...politics doesn't have to be endorsing a side?
I'm pretty sure you're still endorsing people to play into the real political world, so I just think that's not the biggest issue here
the site constitutes mobile friendly as being below 300 parts, so honestly it's not essential, given how you can also save part counts with being conservative with your glass fuselage.
imho, you should only really use 1 block canopy parts when you're pushing part efficiency to it's near limit or when you're really lazy.
you didn't read the faq didn't you?
Point A: Will SP2 release in mobile too?
I don't think you realize that mobile users makes up significant amount of playerbase. If Jundroo stopped mobile support entirely, they would lose huge amounts of playerbase.
The answer is yes.
Point B: Will devs please actually update the game?
As if the last 12 updates wasn't an update. SimplePlanes has come a long way ever since it's initially released, and the fact that you're not appreciating what the devs had accomplished over the course of 9 or so years is in itself a moral crime.
Also, 1000 parts is a lot of parts. And though SimplePlanes is simple to learn, it isn't simple for your system (especially lower ends) to simulate nearly every part present on one's builds. You can't really force the devs on that one.
Point C: Screens on cockpits and Multifunctional Display?
Please watch the trailer.
Point D: Please add mobile mod support
Please stop whining about it. We're just sick of it at this point.
@Randomplayer
honestly, just make good stuff.
people tend to like it alot when you make realistic things, replicas that looks like the actual thing, or vr stuff that looks genuine (in other words just put a bunch of features in)
one thing missing imo is arresting wire and catapult stock parts
is it wrong to be able to land and takeoff (catobar ops) on your own carrier without funky magnet magic?
I found one source, saying that the RD-133 has a power of:
5040kgf dry (11,100lbf);
8300kgf afterburner (18,290lbf)
Idk if this is true or not, but it is close enough to the normal RD-33 engine power output so maybe it is
I'll give credits where it's due because it looks good, but I have several things I will say about it, to keep you in mind whenever you want to remake it:
first one that caught my eye was the vertical stabilizer, the trailing edge sweep of the vertical stabilizer is too much, as in reality it's like, 10°, Idk, I don't want to measure it
2nd, again, but this time it's with the main wing, afaIk, the trailing edge on the main wing doesn't have that much sweep
3rd, gun placement is much closer towards the root of the extension, as where you place it, it's supposed to house some avionics
4th, countermeasure placement depends on variants, since I'm assuming this is the 9.13 variant of the MiG-29 (the likes of A, S, SMT), the countermeasure placement is along the base of the vertical stabilizer
if you need references on these, I'll give you some, but looking at google images also work
@F8boa
+1For the time being, that'll be a negative.
Considering how this aircraft had already brought my device to it's near limit, adding more features, especially the more complicated ones will be a bit too taxing for even my Redmi Note 13.
If you want however, feel free to add it yourself! Just be sure to credit by either leaving the Auto-Credit on, or by leaving my name somewhere in the description. Just don't claim it as your own self-made creation.
@SuperSuperTheSylph
+1yoooo
front looks good
+1backside not so much
specifically the engine compartment being too small
I'm not gonna lie I wish it has more motif than just マウスちゃん on the maus-tank
+1other than that, epique
@IQinventory
+1see for yourself. it's better to explain it in images.
wrong wing pylon placement
+1though it's kinda hard to do one so I'll let it pass Ig
@F16xl
+1but like...
...politics doesn't have to be endorsing a side?
I'm pretty sure you're still endorsing people to play into the real political world, so I just think that's not the biggest issue here
@SuperSuperTheSylph
+1yeah I found out that a while ago
wah
+1@SuperSuperTheSylph
+1I for my life cannot find any specifications about any of the rockets or the bombs lmao
the blurred text concerns me
+1soooo
+1where's the archiver dude again?
@Ashdenpaw1
+1here's a question
why are you looking for money in the sp site anyway?
maybe try not to be so money-eyed when you think of upvotes
the site constitutes mobile friendly as being below 300 parts, so honestly it's not essential, given how you can also save part counts with being conservative with your glass fuselage.
+1imho, you should only really use 1 block canopy parts when you're pushing part efficiency to it's near limit or when you're really lazy.
@SuperSuperTheSylph
+1he decided to be alive again
imgbb ntah kenapa ngehapus gambar gambar lama, cuma paling ngebug
+1selain itu aku masih pake, aman kok skrg (ya gw telat gw tau)
@Graingy
+1lmfao why is this the first thing I see as I scroll down
@Monarchii
+1don't worry, I get that too with my PEAs sometimes xd
oh shit chii's here
+1how are ya? great build as always btw
@PrussianAirlines
+1yes, and no.
Can I? Definitely.
Will I? Not really.
phrog
+1you didn't read the faq didn't you?
+1Point A: Will SP2 release in mobile too?
I don't think you realize that mobile users makes up significant amount of playerbase. If Jundroo stopped mobile support entirely, they would lose huge amounts of playerbase.
The answer is yes.
Point B: Will devs please actually update the game?
As if the last 12 updates wasn't an update. SimplePlanes has come a long way ever since it's initially released, and the fact that you're not appreciating what the devs had accomplished over the course of 9 or so years is in itself a moral crime.
Also, 1000 parts is a lot of parts. And though SimplePlanes is simple to learn, it isn't simple for your system (especially lower ends) to simulate nearly every part present on one's builds. You can't really force the devs on that one.
Point C: Screens on cockpits and Multifunctional Display?
Please watch the trailer.
Point D: Please add mobile mod support
Please stop whining about it. We're just sick of it at this point.
I remember this thing
+1@Realturtlecat
+1ok.
oh so that's why
+1honestly the gc has been real quiet without you lmao
take your time
+1nobody's gonna push you to make new stuff constantly
honestly this is the same kind of stupid shit I pulled when I complained 'why is my t10 not curateable'
+1I was fucking stupid
@Randomplayer
+1honestly, just make good stuff.
people tend to like it alot when you make realistic things, replicas that looks like the actual thing, or vr stuff that looks genuine (in other words just put a bunch of features in)
aside from the overpowered engine this thing is real nice
+1unironically great design
+1Idk why lmfao
the words "cool maneuverability" is a bit concerning when you consider the fact that it's still a 104 xd
+1one thing missing imo is arresting wire and catapult stock parts
+1is it wrong to be able to land and takeoff (catobar ops) on your own carrier without funky magnet magic?
yoo holy shit I just remembered this
+1@Rb2h
+1don't need to
just move the files on.
zoltraak.
+1@LunarEclipseSP
+1I believe so when I first made it.
this is great
+1my only suggestion is move the main wing a bit backward, but other than that, this is ballin
I found one source, saying that the RD-133 has a power of:
+15040kgf dry (11,100lbf);
8300kgf afterburner (18,290lbf)
Idk if this is true or not, but it is close enough to the normal RD-33 engine power output so maybe it is
not bad.
+1@SuperSuperTheSylph
+1damn right you are.
this makes me want to do a j20
+1@TheUltimatePlaneLover
+1oh aight
add one to the list.
certified supra resing
+1the similarities are too uncanny
+1dudeduwdudedudedudedudeduduw
+1DREU
wuuuuuuuuuUUUUEEEEEEEEEEW-
I'll give credits where it's due because it looks good, but I have several things I will say about it, to keep you in mind whenever you want to remake it:
+1if you need references on these, I'll give you some, but looking at google images also work
how would you like it if I try to become an inspector for PEA (I most likely will be merciless, or not, Idk)
+1@SuperSuperTheSylph
+1yeg
@ComradeSandman
+1I'll show it later then.
@SuperSuperTheSylph
+1what even was your dc user