one thing missing imo is arresting wire and catapult stock parts
is it wrong to be able to land and takeoff (catobar ops) on your own carrier without funky magnet magic?
you're not wrong
sp drag is extremely overestimated, I found this out myself when I was switching to a different engine power method.
I think this is because when you make a pure non xml edited aircraft, they tend to be very light, and their engines tend to be very overpowered, so naturally they have a huge TWR, and so the drag is supposed to be huge to compensate for the overexaggerated TWR.
Idk, my theory might be wrong
as have been discussed multiple times before, mod support from v1.9 onward will only be for PC, and is discontinued with mobile
though some mods are available, they are extremely difficult to find across the site, since mod support for android is generally discontinued
as for the reason, I don't exactly understand why, but it has something to do about google being incompatible with sp android's game engine.
as for iOS, your luck was out the moment you start playing on apple devices, because apple policies made it extremely difficult to make mods compatible, I believe.
I found one source, saying that the RD-133 has a power of:
5040kgf dry (11,100lbf);
8300kgf afterburner (18,290lbf)
Idk if this is true or not, but it is close enough to the normal RD-33 engine power output so maybe it is
@TheNewSPplayer
no, they function like that so the aircraft stabilizes along with angle of attack
the canards try to be level with the angle of attack, so itself is almost always at 0° aoa
you dropped out of midschool since 14? holy shit that must've been hard for ya
can't say the same cause I'm born in a pretty capable family for our neighborhood
anyway, here's a cool motivator or smth:
Keep movin' forward, and regain everything you've lost. Because you deserve it more than anybody. Good luck, soldier!
sorry if I sound ingenuine, it runs in my blood xd
@TheCommentaryGuy
I'm not asking in general, I'm asking for whether someone has made a Part Efficient Aircraft F-14.
I would be stupid to think that there never was an F-14 on the site
to keep it short:
make it comfortable to play in vr.
controls shouldn't be too far from the camera, and the cockpit should be relative to the aircraft's size.
Idk if they're still handing out the curated status, but, that's the gist of it.
I wouldn't recommend it tbh
everyone makes mistakes, and not alot of people get as much upvotes as the higher skills
which is why you build on experience, not on popularity
try to learn from mistakes, take critiscism as a building material, not a boulder.
I'll give credits where it's due because it looks good, but I have several things I will say about it, to keep you in mind whenever you want to remake it:
first one that caught my eye was the vertical stabilizer, the trailing edge sweep of the vertical stabilizer is too much, as in reality it's like, 10°, Idk, I don't want to measure it
2nd, again, but this time it's with the main wing, afaIk, the trailing edge on the main wing doesn't have that much sweep
3rd, gun placement is much closer towards the root of the extension, as where you place it, it's supposed to house some avionics
4th, countermeasure placement depends on variants, since I'm assuming this is the 9.13 variant of the MiG-29 (the likes of A, S, SMT), the countermeasure placement is along the base of the vertical stabilizer
if you need references on these, I'll give you some, but looking at google images also work
general bynamics.
unironically great design
+1Idk why lmfao
the words "cool maneuverability" is a bit concerning when you consider the fact that it's still a 104 xd
+1never was that person
+4lmfao
respectfully, skill issue
+7one thing missing imo is arresting wire and catapult stock parts
+1is it wrong to be able to land and takeoff (catobar ops) on your own carrier without funky magnet magic?
yooo isn't this @VeroViper's?
bro at the very least give him credits
yoo holy shit I just remembered this
+1@NavalGunnery
you can get around it, but I'm just more concerned about whether I should really post how or not.
@Graingy
believe it or not, it's still.underpowered compared to the F119, which is the F-22's engines.
@Nerfaddict
I haven't extensively tested it, since I only really tested my previous device limit, around 800 parts
suffice to say, it runs very well.
@Rb2h
+1don't need to
just move the files on.
you're not wrong
sp drag is extremely overestimated, I found this out myself when I was switching to a different engine power method.
I think this is because when you make a pure non xml edited aircraft, they tend to be very light, and their engines tend to be very overpowered, so naturally they have a huge TWR, and so the drag is supposed to be huge to compensate for the overexaggerated TWR.
Idk, my theory might be wrong
short answer, yes.
as have been discussed multiple times before, mod support from v1.9 onward will only be for PC, and is discontinued with mobile
+2though some mods are available, they are extremely difficult to find across the site, since mod support for android is generally discontinued
as for the reason, I don't exactly understand why, but it has something to do about google being incompatible with sp android's game engine.
as for iOS, your luck was out the moment you start playing on apple devices, because apple policies made it extremely difficult to make mods compatible, I believe.
zoltraak.
+1tis' aight. better to save on your health than to risk it
@LunarEclipseSP
+1I believe so when I first made it.
this is great
+1my only suggestion is move the main wing a bit backward, but other than that, this is ballin
I found one source, saying that the RD-133 has a power of:
+15040kgf dry (11,100lbf);
8300kgf afterburner (18,290lbf)
Idk if this is true or not, but it is close enough to the normal RD-33 engine power output so maybe it is
not bad.
+1people will always find anime characters to be put onto things that they're not supposed to be in and I'm all in for it
+7@SuperSuperTheSylph
+1damn right you are.
@TheNewSPplayer
no, they function like that so the aircraft stabilizes along with angle of attack
the canards try to be level with the angle of attack, so itself is almost always at 0° aoa
@VeroViper
+2<< Got a Yellow! >>
this makes me want to do a j20
+1you dropped out of midschool since 14? holy shit that must've been hard for ya
can't say the same cause I'm born in a pretty capable family for our neighborhood
anyway, here's a cool motivator or smth:
Keep movin' forward, and regain everything you've lost. Because you deserve it more than anybody. Good luck, soldier!
sorry if I sound ingenuine, it runs in my blood xd
@TheCommentaryGuy
sorry I'm not into any jokes today
@OrangeConnor2
maybe read the title more carefully again?
@TheCommentaryGuy
I'm not asking in general, I'm asking for whether someone has made a Part Efficient Aircraft F-14.
I would be stupid to think that there never was an F-14 on the site
poster child of resing
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26
a heads up, I'm taking the D
@TheUltimatePlaneLover
+1oh aight
add one to the list.
to keep it short:
make it comfortable to play in vr.
controls shouldn't be too far from the camera, and the cockpit should be relative to the aircraft's size.
Idk if they're still handing out the curated status, but, that's the gist of it.
@Aghsan22
very funny
no.
+3@SuperSuperTheSylph
+2@TheUltimatePlaneLover
certified supra resing
+1@TsukasaYuzaki
sure, as long as you credit me.
I wouldn't recommend it tbh
everyone makes mistakes, and not alot of people get as much upvotes as the higher skills
which is why you build on experience, not on popularity
try to learn from mistakes, take critiscism as a building material, not a boulder.
@MTDP
sure
don't tag me, but do please credit me, leaving auto-credit works.
the similarities are too uncanny
+1dudeduwdudedudedudedudeduduw
+1DREU
wuuuuuuuuuUUUUEEEEEEEEEEW-
@RealMicroZackSP
no.
@L3FT2R1GHT
+2@rorrE
@Rjenteissussy
+3@Zhixunlin23
@TheUltimatePlaneLover
@DatFiat126Fan19
+3@SuperSuperTheSylph
@Lem113
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26
self explanatory intakes that form an S shaped duct to the engine
comment below explains it.
you can use something called PAT, which essentially is just stacking 2 cut fuselages atop of one another.
@ACUTEPIGEON
if you're talking about my social media accounts, you can check my profile for it
I'll give credits where it's due because it looks good, but I have several things I will say about it, to keep you in mind whenever you want to remake it:
+1if you need references on these, I'll give you some, but looking at google images also work