I enjoyed making em.
I would make them again just because of the fact I can make them my target practice
they're also really easy to pump out, the only problem being that it's hard to adjust the flight model with such limitation
to clear up things:
playing the game and being on the site is 2 different things.
yes, the game is rated for 4+ years old, but the site isn't.
you have to be 13 to be making an account on the site and interacting with the community, not to play the game.
apart from that, if you want an honest tip
just get good.
there are many ways on how to get good and a part of that is to download someone's aircraft and see whatever techniques they used to make their planes.
and also stop caring about upvotes. like seriously lmao, it's just internet points that doesn't give you anything else but dopamine it's basically drugs if you let it be your main goal lmao
I just wanna say that the pattern of the missile launch is different from what I experienced
from my experiences, missiles are fired in an alternating pattern, working it's way from the inside to the outside
also, the ones placed on the rear of the aircraft will launch first, before switching towards the front ones.
aside from that, I can't really help much
I mean, I know some ways to make activation groups work since they're kinda just simple yes or no question but, I don't think I can help much.
I mean
you kinda just, use a fuselage block, adjust them (be sure to out 0 mass and drag), and stuff a hidden wing inside? Idk what else
ok, there is something else but what I usually do is I make a single fuselage block, and shape them into a wing
cut them off for the control surfaces, replicate that cut, just the opposite and attach a rotator into it
and then stuff a hidden wing inside that matches the dimensions of the fuselage block
@Randomplayer
honestly, just make good stuff.
people tend to like it alot when you make realistic things, replicas that looks like the actual thing, or vr stuff that looks genuine (in other words just put a bunch of features in)
@TheUltimatePlaneLover
thanks lol
as for the question, I think it's more to do with how ice creams are made and not what are ice creams made of
I'm sure there is a better explanation of it but that's what I could come up with.
@KPLBall
ight, I'll give you some tips then
for the A-4, utilize a lot of cover
play around in terrain since you don't have the best everything
once you grab a kill, don't get too cocky and get back in cover for a 2nd attack run
for the F-100, try to be as aggressive, and avoid light fighters
heavy fighters aren't going to be able to keep up with you in turns, and mediums fighters are going to go toe to toe with you
generally, avoid attackers because they're too bulky and too long to kill, unless you're confident can spam them with missiles at close range.
Arena Breakout
SimplePlanes
Metalstorm
...That's about it.
Yeah, I'm not too screwed unless they come up in an F1.
off topic, the planes you've mentioned in metalstorm that are absolute menaces aren't even menaces.
The F-15 is honestly mid (speaking as an Eagle main), the F-4 sucks without it's abilities, the M.III is somewhat balanced because of it's rather slow turn rate, A-4 is garbage, and Su-33 imho is not the best Flanker in the game.
And to the people saying skill issue, can you not think of one intelligent thing to say?
not at that moment, cause I'm gonna be brutally honest, it's a fact.
but ok, here, what are you having problems with? connections not connecting? probably because it isn't a valid connection to begin with.
connection points have to be very specifically put onto another connection point for it to actually connect both parts, so maybe the issue you're having is you're not aligning both side of the connection point correctly, preventing it from connecting to one another.
alot of parts are like this, but some aren't, like fuselage parts. Though it's displayed that they only have 7-8 connection points, they have a lot of connection points that isn't visible, making it virtually connectable on almost every side. I say almost because there are very specific sides that it won't connect to. Not that I know where. But most often, if it's visually touching, it can most likely connect.
for other parts, you're only going to really have 1-2 connection points in average, so you can't be as free as using fuselages. This is because the devs ever rarely update a part, and also it's much simpler and easier to understand to have a single connection point than double, or triple the amount.
my honest tip? treat simpleplanes' building system like minecraft's, but slightly more complicated. Don't be afraid to mod your parts, don't be afraid to nudge 'em.
that's about it, Ig.
@Pakkoyan
apparently he's accusing of mods "hacking" his builds too
I'm gonna be honest with ya, does that make sense to your ears? cause it certainly didn't for me.
one thing missing imo is arresting wire and catapult stock parts
is it wrong to be able to land and takeoff (catobar ops) on your own carrier without funky magnet magic?
you're not wrong
sp drag is extremely overestimated, I found this out myself when I was switching to a different engine power method.
I think this is because when you make a pure non xml edited aircraft, they tend to be very light, and their engines tend to be very overpowered, so naturally they have a huge TWR, and so the drag is supposed to be huge to compensate for the overexaggerated TWR.
Idk, my theory might be wrong
as have been discussed multiple times before, mod support from v1.9 onward will only be for PC, and is discontinued with mobile
though some mods are available, they are extremely difficult to find across the site, since mod support for android is generally discontinued
as for the reason, I don't exactly understand why, but it has something to do about google being incompatible with sp android's game engine.
as for iOS, your luck was out the moment you start playing on apple devices, because apple policies made it extremely difficult to make mods compatible, I believe.
I enjoyed making em.
+3I would make them again just because of the fact I can make them my target practice
they're also really easy to pump out, the only problem being that it's hard to adjust the flight model with such limitation
I remember this thing
+1to clear up things:
+4playing the game and being on the site is 2 different things.
yes, the game is rated for 4+ years old, but the site isn't.
you have to be 13 to be making an account on the site and interacting with the community, not to play the game.
I would want to know how do you "refresh" a code
there is a variable output for jet engines.
it's called Thrust
@TheGliderGuy
perhaps clean the screen then lol
Idk
apart from that, if you want an honest tip
just get good.
there are many ways on how to get good and a part of that is to download someone's aircraft and see whatever techniques they used to make their planes.
and also stop caring about upvotes. like seriously lmao, it's just internet points that doesn't give you anything else but dopamine it's basically drugs if you let it be your main goal lmao
@Realturtlecat
+1ok.
I just wanna say that the pattern of the missile launch is different from what I experienced
from my experiences, missiles are fired in an alternating pattern, working it's way from the inside to the outside
also, the ones placed on the rear of the aircraft will launch first, before switching towards the front ones.
aside from that, I can't really help much
I mean, I know some ways to make activation groups work since they're kinda just simple yes or no question but, I don't think I can help much.
oh so that's why
+1honestly the gc has been real quiet without you lmao
I mean if the alleged comments are true and you are in fact a 7 year old, then, yes.
but, other than that, your choice.
I'm not a huge tank builder but this is epic
omg bro banned!!!!!
-apologizes for quality
-proceeds to take the cleanest resolution I have ever seen
man hasn't cooked enough
I mean
+5you kinda just, use a fuselage block, adjust them (be sure to out 0 mass and drag), and stuff a hidden wing inside? Idk what else
ok, there is something else but what I usually do is I make a single fuselage block, and shape them into a wing
cut them off for the control surfaces, replicate that cut, just the opposite and attach a rotator into it
and then stuff a hidden wing inside that matches the dimensions of the fuselage block
take your time
+1nobody's gonna push you to make new stuff constantly
I think there's like an addon for it or smth but yeah, it's kind of a hassle for most of us so whoever is in charge of designing the site pls do lol
honestly this is the same kind of stupid shit I pulled when I complained 'why is my t10 not curateable'
+1I was fucking stupid
just admit that you took too much inspiration from the j20 my guy lmfao
@Randomplayer
+1honestly, just make good stuff.
people tend to like it alot when you make realistic things, replicas that looks like the actual thing, or vr stuff that looks genuine (in other words just put a bunch of features in)
@DatFiat126Fan19
thanks
@TheUltimatePlaneLover
thanks lol
as for the question, I think it's more to do with how ice creams are made and not what are ice creams made of
I'm sure there is a better explanation of it but that's what I could come up with.
beauty
aside from the overpowered engine this thing is real nice
+1just a bit deformed but I like it
good job.
very epiq
@Stephen22
looks like someone didn't read the exposition.
the reason I put the avenger on is because the challenge required me to do so
@KPLBall
ight, I'll give you some tips then
for the A-4, utilize a lot of cover
play around in terrain since you don't have the best everything
once you grab a kill, don't get too cocky and get back in cover for a 2nd attack run
for the F-100, try to be as aggressive, and avoid light fighters
heavy fighters aren't going to be able to keep up with you in turns, and mediums fighters are going to go toe to toe with you
generally, avoid attackers because they're too bulky and too long to kill, unless you're confident can spam them with missiles at close range.
@KPLBall
probably because you weren't careful enough.
and no, the A-4 still sucks and the community agrees.
Miosha? lore wise, yes. I would lose.
+2real wise? I don't wanna dare to fight her (I'd die from emotional damage)
Arena Breakout
SimplePlanes
Metalstorm
...That's about it.
Yeah, I'm not too screwed unless they come up in an F1.
off topic, the planes you've mentioned in metalstorm that are absolute menaces aren't even menaces.
The F-15 is honestly mid (speaking as an Eagle main), the F-4 sucks without it's abilities, the M.III is somewhat balanced because of it's rather slow turn rate, A-4 is garbage, and Su-33 imho is not the best Flanker in the game.
@GeneralCorpInc
yeah, sup?
not at that moment, cause I'm gonna be brutally honest, it's a fact.
+2but ok, here, what are you having problems with? connections not connecting? probably because it isn't a valid connection to begin with.
connection points have to be very specifically put onto another connection point for it to actually connect both parts, so maybe the issue you're having is you're not aligning both side of the connection point correctly, preventing it from connecting to one another.
alot of parts are like this, but some aren't, like fuselage parts. Though it's displayed that they only have 7-8 connection points, they have a lot of connection points that isn't visible, making it virtually connectable on almost every side. I say almost because there are very specific sides that it won't connect to. Not that I know where. But most often, if it's visually touching, it can most likely connect.
for other parts, you're only going to really have 1-2 connection points in average, so you can't be as free as using fuselages. This is because the devs ever rarely update a part, and also it's much simpler and easier to understand to have a single connection point than double, or triple the amount.
my honest tip? treat simpleplanes' building system like minecraft's, but slightly more complicated. Don't be afraid to mod your parts, don't be afraid to nudge 'em.
that's about it, Ig.
@Pakkoyan
+2apparently he's accusing of mods "hacking" his builds too
I'm gonna be honest with ya, does that make sense to your ears? cause it certainly didn't for me.
general bynamics.
unironically great design
+1Idk why lmfao
the words "cool maneuverability" is a bit concerning when you consider the fact that it's still a 104 xd
+1never was that person
+4lmfao
respectfully, skill issue
+7one thing missing imo is arresting wire and catapult stock parts
+1is it wrong to be able to land and takeoff (catobar ops) on your own carrier without funky magnet magic?
yooo isn't this @VeroViper's?
bro at the very least give him credits
yoo holy shit I just remembered this
+1@NavalGunnery
you can get around it, but I'm just more concerned about whether I should really post how or not.
@Graingy
believe it or not, it's still.underpowered compared to the F119, which is the F-22's engines.
@Nerfaddict
I haven't extensively tested it, since I only really tested my previous device limit, around 800 parts
suffice to say, it runs very well.
@Rb2h
+1don't need to
just move the files on.
you're not wrong
sp drag is extremely overestimated, I found this out myself when I was switching to a different engine power method.
I think this is because when you make a pure non xml edited aircraft, they tend to be very light, and their engines tend to be very overpowered, so naturally they have a huge TWR, and so the drag is supposed to be huge to compensate for the overexaggerated TWR.
Idk, my theory might be wrong
short answer, yes.
as have been discussed multiple times before, mod support from v1.9 onward will only be for PC, and is discontinued with mobile
+2though some mods are available, they are extremely difficult to find across the site, since mod support for android is generally discontinued
as for the reason, I don't exactly understand why, but it has something to do about google being incompatible with sp android's game engine.
as for iOS, your luck was out the moment you start playing on apple devices, because apple policies made it extremely difficult to make mods compatible, I believe.
zoltraak.
+1