@xNotDumb
Just think about it. If you ignore me, I'll just probably forget that this ever happened. And while I might win, that's just short term. If I continue to try to insult you and you stay calm, and ignore me, I'll get tired soon enough and stop doing this shit. And you'll win in long term. Besides, I'm not really the kinda guy that tries to insult people just for fun. I rarely do that.
For the sake of our sanity, please ignore me, and don't reply again.
@xNotDumb You just completely missed the point. If I AM trying to insult you, why don't you try to ignore ME? Am I that respectul for trying to insult you in every way possible? I'm just trying to say that begging for upvotes is not allowed. Even if it's NOT for points.
@Mekomara
are you below that speed? Reminder that SP uses metric as raw data. Speed is actually in m/s. If you're using km/h, go to calculator and divide the number by 3.6.
@xNotDumb
Why don't try to ignore it then?
Why don't try to ignore me instead of debating about this supposedly "not rule breaking request"?
Besides, the rule is there. "Don't beg for upvotes". It doesn't matter for who it is, it's just not allowed.
First of all, collect data. Get to know your aircraft first and how much speed does it starts to stall. Then get a beacon light or a text.
If you get a beacon light, use this: GearDown ? 0 : (IAS<(whatever speed it was)). Haven't actually tested it yet, but I'm sure it'll work.
If you get a text, type this: {GearDown ? "(put fcs ready or smth you want here)" : (IAS<again, whatever speed it was> ? "STALL" : "(smth you want here)}. Again, haven't actually tested it, but it revolves around speed.
Damage part indicator is possible, but it is way beyond my reach.
Again possible, but beyond my reach.
Currently unable. The only way for a parking brake is to just hold down the brake until the day you die or restart the sandbox.
Autopilots are pretty hard to do. The only thing I could think off is the PitchRate/40, and trim up input. While yes, it is possible with gyro, but gyro doesn't let you turn. Well, at least that's my impression after using it for once and never again.
Please read the actual post first before you comment T... Just please. How hard is it to take just 15 seconds and type "Sorry, but I don't have any Idea"? I know I'm being rude, but just, please. Please give your message a little more effort than just a simple T...
In my opinion, I prefer an F/A-18. Specifically the E.
Simply because the fact that it's much more challenging, and it rewards you with such bullshittery when you finally merged with your opponent.
@GorillaGuerrilla
when did I say I hate thrust vectoring?
I said it's bullshit because I love it so much. yes I know that's not how you use the word bullshit, but I just love putting bullshit after thrust vectoring or smth
Also please. Space out your sentences next time, because this message is too big.
Well, I mean, if you're using just one engine, then I suggest you change that. Get the BFE-150 and a low powered jet engine. First off, you want to disconnect the BFE-150, to measure the low powered engine's thrust to weight, while recalibrating it to whatever number you'd like. These numbers can be found in the info menu.
Then, you proceed to attach the BFE-150 again (please make the mass 0, and the collision to false), and then tune up or down the engine's power. After that, put "Throttle>0.9" on the BFE-150, and finally, position them in the same place.
I myself don't search any G-limiters, instead I use the input "Activate8 ? Pitch*0.5 : Pitch" on a rotator.
wait wasn't it destroyed by Mobius 1?
Fun fact: Stonehenge is apparently a thing that plagued ISAF for so long and all it took was a madman with a stealth jet to destroy it, and what did he get? 16 deadpan words
@xNotDumb
Just think about it. If you ignore me, I'll just probably forget that this ever happened. And while I might win, that's just short term. If I continue to try to insult you and you stay calm, and ignore me, I'll get tired soon enough and stop doing this shit. And you'll win in long term. Besides, I'm not really the kinda guy that tries to insult people just for fun. I rarely do that.
For the sake of our sanity, please ignore me, and don't reply again.
@GriseoCattus
:D
Thank you my guy!
@GriseoCattus
да
@Chickendude
gaada udah
@xNotDumb
You just completely missed the point. If I AM trying to insult you, why don't you try to ignore ME? Am I that respectul for trying to insult you in every way possible? I'm just trying to say that begging for upvotes is not allowed. Even if it's NOT for points.
@Mekomara
+1no prob, happy to help.
@Mekomara
are you below that speed? Reminder that SP uses metric as raw data. Speed is actually in m/s. If you're using km/h, go to calculator and divide the number by 3.6.
nice, keep goin'.
@xNotDumb
Why don't try to ignore it then?
Why don't try to ignore me instead of debating about this supposedly "not rule breaking request"?
Besides, the rule is there. "Don't beg for upvotes". It doesn't matter for who it is, it's just not allowed.
@xNotDumb
...Ok?
Also please stop using "sussy", it isn't even funny anymore at this point.
I hate those kinds of tones.
- Check out this
- First of all, collect data. Get to know your aircraft first and how much speed does it starts to stall. Then get a beacon light or a text.
- If you get a beacon light, use this: GearDown ? 0 : (IAS<(whatever speed it was)). Haven't actually tested it yet, but I'm sure it'll work.
- If you get a text, type this: {GearDown ? "(put fcs ready or smth you want here)" : (IAS<again, whatever speed it was> ? "STALL" : "(smth you want here)}. Again, haven't actually tested it, but it revolves around speed.
- Damage part indicator is possible, but it is way beyond my reach.
- Again possible, but beyond my reach.
- Currently unable. The only way for a parking brake is to just hold down the brake until the day you die or restart the sandbox.
- Autopilots are pretty hard to do. The only thing I could think off is the PitchRate/40, and trim up input. While yes, it is possible with gyro, but gyro doesn't let you turn. Well, at least that's my impression after using it for once and never again.
+2@xNotDumb
still, I sense a rule breaker.
login to the game. Or download one from the game.
+3cool.
"Please upvote"
+1hmm, I sense a rule breaker.
dude. It's an Eagle II. HOLY SHIT IT'S AN EAGLE II TAG ME ON IT
@Korzalerke
+1finally.
@Korzalerke
+1again, no.
@Korzalerke
+1again, no.
@Korzalerke
+1again, no.
@Korzalerke
+1again, no.
Dude, nice! Very nice!
Please read the actual post first before you comment T... Just please. How hard is it to take just 15 seconds and type "Sorry, but I don't have any Idea"? I know I'm being rude, but just, please. Please give your message a little more effort than just a simple T...
In my opinion, I prefer an F/A-18. Specifically the E.
+1Simply because the fact that it's much more challenging, and it rewards you with such bullshittery when you finally merged with your opponent.
@Korzalerke @AirCrashInvestigationFLR
No.
Sorry, but the F-4 is not British made. The F-4 is American made.
+1@Krikkit42
Thanks, if you want to see another one, there's the F-5E. But since it's the F-5E, it's going to be a little less amazing.
@Krikkit42
didn't pay attention. I did publish it anyway. If you're curious what it is, it's the MiG-29.
@rexzion
upgraded F-5Es can have these
@MABUR
iya, banyak yg komen susah ya jadi diganti aja
@KanKalashnikov
just do what you did like last time. And put some throttleResponse while you're at it.
@WorstPlaneIEverMake
now you can, congrats!
Just reupload it as a successor.
@Numbers2
@Falco7
@Th3rmoplylae
Ok, next time, please have it as a succesor to my post, I almost missed it.
@GorillaGuerrilla
@KanKalashnikov
@WorstPlaneIEverMake
@GriseoCattus
@Chickendude
@MABUR
You might want to see this.
@AWESOMENESS360
you know what, you got a point.
net, there's nothing about it yet.
+1@Amirabadi
why sorry about it? Besides it's published already
@DragoransEscarti
Then try to overcome them. I know it sounds easier than what it actually is, but try your best, and maybe you'll succeed!
I mean, everything can't go smooth sailing. And that rough seas you go through needs to be learned by yourself. Keep up the good work.
@FeatherWing
Oh wait I definitely said that wrong
What I meant to say was usually
@GriseoCattus
cool
@WolfHunter9111
+2more like the F-15 ACTIVE, pretty good.
Use fuselages. They're very cool.
@GorillaGuerrilla
It's not necesarrily hacking, since you can't really do that in SP.
You get a chance to edit your posted aircraft.
voting over, making the F-5E now.
@GorillaGuerrilla
when did I say I hate thrust vectoring?
I said it's bullshit because I love it so much. yes I know that's not how you use the word bullshit, but I just love putting bullshit after thrust vectoring or smth
Also please. Space out your sentences next time, because this message is too big.
Well, I mean, if you're using just one engine, then I suggest you change that. Get the BFE-150 and a low powered jet engine. First off, you want to disconnect the BFE-150, to measure the low powered engine's thrust to weight, while recalibrating it to whatever number you'd like. These numbers can be found in the info menu.
Then, you proceed to attach the BFE-150 again (please make the mass 0, and the collision to false), and then tune up or down the engine's power. After that, put "Throttle>0.9" on the BFE-150, and finally, position them in the same place.
I myself don't search any G-limiters, instead I use the input "Activate8 ? Pitch*0.5 : Pitch" on a rotator.
wait wasn't it destroyed by Mobius 1?
+7Fun fact: Stonehenge is apparently a thing that plagued ISAF for so long and all it took was a madman with a stealth jet to destroy it, and what did he get? 16 deadpan words
@Chickendude
нет. If I say below 2000, it has to be below 2000.