64.3k ZeroWithSlashedO Comments

  • 7++ Generation naval commander (WIP teaser) 3.0 years ago

    why is it a successor to my challenge though?
    either way this is still getting upvoted since I still owe you like 8 upvotes

  • [CLOSED] 5th Generation Fighter Challenge 3.0 years ago

    BRO ANOTHER MONTH DELAY?
    su57 time :)))))

    +3
  • Lockheed Martin F-22A Raptor 3.0 years ago

    @SemiCollin
    Because it doesn't have one in the first place.

    +2
  • Experimental Challenge [Closed] 3.0 years ago

    @HalfaBlock
    I mean it is considered a prototype in my book, so... yeah.
    Some like, design that isn't build and not based on an aircraft is considered to be a prototype in my book.

    +1
  • Experimental Challenge [Closed] 3.0 years ago

    @HalfaBlock
    What's that?

    +1
  • Experimental Challenge [Closed] 3.0 years ago

    @xNotDumb
    What kinda person are you?

    +1
  • Experimental Challenge [Closed] 3.0 years ago

    Another thing:
    Judges will judge your aircraft based on:
    Looks:
    ??/35 (If Intermediate)
    ??/60 (If Expert)
    Performance:
    ??/35 (If Intermediate)
    ??/60 (If Expert)
    Bonus features:
    ??/30

  • Experimental Challenge [Closed] 3.0 years ago

    @xNotDumb
    I still don't understand...
    Replicas and Fictionals are allowed, didn't I say it like that?

    +1
  • Experimental Challenge [Closed] 3.0 years ago

    @xNotDumb
    I... Don't understand what you're saying.

    +1
  • some XML suggestions to reduce pain 3.0 years ago

    For sound inputs also,
    Sonic boom.
    Also gun impact noise depending on damage, gun noise becoming a bit echoey after shooting, and gun delay noise depending on camera range.

    Also, please add more camera options. The fly-by view kinda sucked.

    +2
  • 3.0 years ago

  • Experimental Challenge [Closed] 3.0 years ago

    @TRD6932
    Yes. Just... Don't completely reupload it. And also please credit the original creator.

    +1
  • Experimental Challenge [Closed] 3.0 years ago

    @TRD6932
    You're doing the X-29, yes?
    Well, that would considered to be on the Stability group.

    +2
  • Experimental Challenge [Closed] 3.0 years ago

    @ThereIsNoahScape
    Oh god, this is hard to explain...

    Okay, first question. Do you know what a prototype is?

    +1
  • Experimental Challenge [Closed] 3.0 years ago

    @QwertyEpic
    You might wanna read it again...

    Also yeah, bombers are allowed. As long as it flies, it's fine.

    +1
  • Experimental Challenge [Closed] 3.0 years ago

    Forgot about something because I'm a very forgetful person, dunno if that's the word for it... But in order to participate, you also have to make your plane as a successor to this post.

    There are 3 ways you can make your creation as a successor, which are:

    • Start building by downloading this and build with the cockpit part still intact
    • Asking a mod to make your plane as a successor to this post,
    • Save your whole aircraft as a subassembly and slap it onto this computer part

  • Experimental Challenge [Closed] 3.0 years ago

    @ThereIsNoahScape
    Basically:
    If you made a fictional prototype, and you have uploaded your thing, you have to make a finished plane out of that prototype.
    Keep the successor on.

    Speaking of successor, I forgot about something.

    +1
  • How to stop drifting durning takeoff? 3.0 years ago

    @GrandmasterPotato
    Alright, post me an unlisted link of it.

  • Experimental Challenge [Closed] 3.0 years ago

    @TheDesignate
    Very much yes.
    I recommend reading the rules first though if you want to participate.

    +1
  • How to make a good modern fighter design? 3.0 years ago

    I dunno
    if you're tryna make replicas, blueprint is the way to go
    maybe look at some references or two
    but if you're tryna make a fictional plane, I suggest starting by basing it off of something else

  • Bomber challenge! [Closed] 3.0 years ago

    I didn't ask for me to be a judge.
    What?
    I said I'll pass, not "I'm in".

    +2
  • How to stop drifting durning takeoff? 3.0 years ago

    @GrandmasterPotato
    Don't countersteer harshly, countersteer softly.

    And about the values, try lowering them.

  • How to stop drifting durning takeoff? 3.0 years ago

    @GrandmasterPotato
    Huh.
    Weird. Tried it before and it was fine...
    Oh wait. Did I forget to mention that, that problem is unfixable?
    Yeah no, You'll have to countersteer slightly in order to even stay straight on the runway.

    Try changing the values of slipSidewaysExtremum and slipSidewaysAsymptote.

  • I need help 3.0 years ago

    So, you want people to mass upvote an aircraft if it wins?
    I'll pass.

  • How to stop drifting durning takeoff? 3.0 years ago

    In the XML of the Resizable Wheel part, there are two things that may help you, which are:
    slipSidewaysExtremum and slipSidewaysAsymptote.
    Try playing around with those values.
    However, if you don't want to go back and forth modifying these, I would suggest just putting the sidewaysTraction to 50%.

  • Not sure if I mentioned this or not but I’ll be a bit more specific than what I probably said before. 3.0 years ago

    I mean, it's not just you that asked for this
    sure, lighting is hard, but that doesn't mean it's not plausible
    hell, I don't think it's harder than to implement the heli rotor :/

  • F-16C Viper V4.2 3.0 years ago

    great as always :)

    +1
  • Lockheed Martin F-35B 3.0 years ago

    @Numbers2
    I'm done.

    The point is, I'm mad.

    Technical issue, yeah. Yeah, cool. Obivously technical issue. Still does NOT explain why he didn't credit MOST creators he "stole", yeah. Cool. Maybe he just forgot and he wasn't totally lazy, that must be the reason, there you happy now?

    I'm done, I'm not going to argue anymore. Call me a loser, I don't care, I'm just done.

    Before you go on your ass typing on that reply,

    Don't. Simply, let me cope with this harsh world.

    +1
  • Lockheed Martin F-35B 3.0 years ago

    @Numbers2
    Before I answer, can't you figure it out yourselves?

    It's not just "not giving credits to other users", it's "not giving credits TO the original creator". In other words, stealing. Just PLEASE when you reupload someone's plane and you changed some stuff on that plane, please do a favor and credit them, or leave them as a successor. Just please.

    I'm not gonna sit here and shut down every single successor of my planes, that'd be a shitty move. I respect when they leave the auto credit alone, but when they just reposted or simply recolored it, I will report it.

    +1
  • Lockheed Martin F-35B 3.0 years ago

    I am simply
    mad

    people are stealing builds and "remastering it"

    I'm gonna be brutally honest
    Yeah Bogan's F-35 does not have a VR compatible cockpit but you simply can't remove the credit he deserved, especially when all you do is remove the external weaponry and added a shitty gun design, while he did all of his job by ACTUALLY MAKING THE AIRPLANE, 2.9 YEARS AGO, TIMES WHERE FUSELAGE GLASS AND FUSELAGE CUTTING DOES NOT EXIST

    now I know, it's not a simple "recolor and random block placements", but still, Bogan deserves his credit, you can't take it away

    to put more salt on the wound, this guy reposted somebody's airplane, probably multiple times by now
    you could've saved yourself, if you listed the changes YOU'VE made and NOT make someone like me accuse you of repostings BECAUSE, IT. LOOKS. THE. FUCKING. SAME.

    at this point I might as well just repost someone else's builds and claim them as mine and remove the autocredits and make them vr capable so I can get more points, but since I don't wanna be a trashcan, I'm not doing it.

    That concludes my rant.

    +3
  • Auto deploy after weapon delay 3.0 years ago

    You could, but it's a grueling process.

    What you want to do is first to drop your bombs one by one to see which will be dropped first, which the next one that'll be dropped after the 1st one, the 2nd, 3rd, and so on so forth. You need to remember which is which, because it is essential.

    Then you wanna go activate the Overload mod (if you're on android), go into every single chute and modify the activation group to ammo("weapon name")<the order of which bombs will be dropped in reverse + 1.

    If say, you want a delayed activation of the chute, you need to put: round(smooth(clamp01(ammo("weapon name")<the order of which bombs will be dropped in reverse +1), 1/delay in seconds)).

  • How to regain the urge to bulid crafts and stop lazyness? 3.0 years ago

    I'd say the first thing to do is basing (is that even a word) your aircraft with another aircraft to get ideas, then make your own blueprint and you can now make the thing

  • Hey guys? 3.0 years ago

    Where is the aircraft I requested?

  • (TEASER) Variable Stability Research Project (G100): 3.0 years ago

    I'm not gonna lie to you
    but that is an X-29

  • I'm remastering this. 3.0 years ago

    sick

  • Backbone of the Soviet Air Force 3.0 years ago

    @ReinMcDeer
    I plan on doing that, don't worry.

    +1
  • Backbone of the Soviet Air Force 3.0 years ago

    @Tookan
    Uhh, not quite.

    +1
  • SR-72 3.0 years ago

    @KDnotSpy
    lmfao

  • SR-72 3.0 years ago

    @KDnotSpy
    who was it

  • SR-72 3.0 years ago

    what are you two talking about

  • Backbone of the Soviet Air Force 3.0 years ago

    @ReinMcDeer
    Yeah, it has it. Though I like rate(Heading) more.

    @WolfHunter9111
    No. The colors are there to represent moving parts. Red are slats, Yellow are fins, Blue are elevons, and Orange are Flaperons. Grey are misc, like Airbrake or Chute doors or whatever you call them.

    +3
  • Jamet Dancing 3.0 years ago

    ampun dah kenapa bisa nyampe kesini

    +2
  • Why the planes that i upload not show up on my jet stream 3.0 years ago

    That's not how your jetstream works...

    +1
  • ADSMF-52 White Knight 3.0 years ago

    oh damn this is cool

    why is the tag rick lmfaooo

  • FUNI DORITO 3.0 years ago

    @KDnotSpy
    nothing, I just thought it's funi

  • [CLOSED] 5th Generation Fighter Challenge 3.0 years ago

    I am casually dominating the competition lmfao
    this feels unfair

    more dudes need to join I feel like I'm crushing it too much

    +2
  • FUNI DORITO 3.0 years ago

    I can't unsee the fact that it is a m2k
    just l o n g and the intake is square

    +3
  • F-14 Frame 3.0 years ago

    @L0RR3B0RR3
    Challenge, unfortunately.

    +1
  • BRRRRRRRRRRRT 3.1 years ago

    Honestly, I think that's good enough.