@Mineglacier7251yt the instructions will help you with that. If you can’t roll whatsoever, your wing hydraulics aren’t on and your “RW” (rear wing) hydraulics aren’t either. The hydraulics switches are on the top right of the vertical dash. Sorry for the misunderstanding. This plane has a realistic startup and hydraulic system so you must flip (mostly) everything you would in real life for those two systems
Can you type out the specifications and rules in this post please? Without them it will be confusing and it will be harder for you to grade. Ex. “How many upvotes second place gets”
@CHRT2025 while all that seems reasonable, can we really trust those facts? I don’t think anything a world superpower will release about how they limit/allow APFSDS capabilities will be truly accurate.
Maybe it is right,
but if I were China I would NOT release a single document (except for the exclusive use of Gaijin.
@CorporalWojak yeah this is one of those topics where us measly citizens have very little full proof knowledge. Thanks for not getting all salty or anything, very rare to come by on the ol’ internet
@CorporalWojak I understand what you are getting at. A 120mm would be better in most cases. I’m just saying that kinetic energy is what matters most ( of course, it could result it higher ricochet chances ).
@CorporalWojak since KE = 1/2 (mass*velocity)squared, a heavier, faster shell will be the best. But the heavier a shell gets, the harder it is to speed it up so some tank designs have a smaller, faster shell in order to save space in the crew compartment, a (usually) lighter gun breech and barrel, and ease of loading if it doesn’t have an autoloader
@CorporalWojak it is not a balance like you said. I will admit it will probably be less kinetic energy in total bc it’s most likely a similar velocity and weight/material.
However, a shell that weighs 20kg traveled at 1000m/s, it would have the same KE as a 30kg shell going 816m/s. Velocity is very important for a smaller shell that weighs less. It is more aerodynamic so it can maintain high speeds for longer.
@wasbir dude your account is gonna blow up if you keep making quality builds and socialize. Get some friends that will upvote your posts and you upvote theirs, it works well
@wasbir yeah the super maneuverable Sukhoi jets are very hard to make fuselage-wise. The nose pointing downward and having a rise in the middle is very tricky
First!
@MetallicBeef6572 yeah I don’t need to post it for myself. I’ll just unpost it, give credit, and tag you to repost maybe (if I actually follow thru)
+1@GrandPrix alr cool
@SCtheONE just XML THAT SHIT!
@GrandPrix cap? Not cap?
@MetallicBeef6572 I can help you if you want. I’m not super great at it but I have a lot of time making them (though, not custom ones lol)
+1@SCtheONE 🤔
used to think that too @Graingy
Yeah that’s tuff af
@MetallicBeef6572
PĒÆĶ
@CatdogAerospace mmmmmmm
@StockPlanesRemastered hehe
“ Ha ha ha I figured out how to do 3 in game pictures” how I need to know!!!!!!!
+1@JeffersonAirraid I’m so sorry Mr dudes phone
@HuskyDynamics01 thanks for the spotlight!
+1@HuskyDynamics01 yeah not easily 💀 I’ve basically quit on this bc it takes so long
@CHRT2025 yeah, nowadays it seems like armor works against RPGs, and HMGs. Once you get to full caliber cannons, they’re shi- I mean shot on.
@CHRT2025 if this is truthful, I would advise you to stay out (or get out) of China 💀
Thanks for the nice info
@Karsond roll down windows that are crank operated would be tuff af
Bro created on android 💀💀💀
@Graingy whoa whoa whoa, that is a potty word.
@BOSSentinel why would you ever fix the problem? It’s just… not right. 💀
@SilverPanzer will probably know, not advocating for them, just tryna help
While I totally wish this was possible, there’s basically no chance this will be added in simpleplanes 1. Possibly SP2 tho.
+1Six or seven
@Mineglacier7251yt the instructions will help you with that. If you can’t roll whatsoever, your wing hydraulics aren’t on and your “RW” (rear wing) hydraulics aren’t either. The hydraulics switches are on the top right of the vertical dash. Sorry for the misunderstanding. This plane has a realistic startup and hydraulic system so you must flip (mostly) everything you would in real life for those two systems
Can you type out the specifications and rules in this post please? Without them it will be confusing and it will be harder for you to grade. Ex. “How many upvotes second place gets”
+1@CorporalWojak below
@CHRT2025 while all that seems reasonable, can we really trust those facts? I don’t think anything a world superpower will release about how they limit/allow APFSDS capabilities will be truly accurate.
Maybe it is right,
+1but if I were China I would NOT release a single document (except for the exclusive use of Gaijin.
@Mineglacier7251yt obviously 100
@CorporalWojak yeah this is one of those topics where us measly citizens have very little full proof knowledge. Thanks for not getting all salty or anything, very rare to come by on the ol’ internet
+1@wasbir nah I was just wondering lol… did you delete two messages?
+1@Boeing727200F or is it a joke
@Boeing727200F I see a hot dog but nothing moderator worthy
Meh easy
+2Light work
EZ
Ez
@wasbir it says you mentioned me twice six hours ago, it didn’t show up
+1@Taboritsky and yeah neither am I an expert 💀
@CorporalWojak I understand what you are getting at. A 120mm would be better in most cases. I’m just saying that kinetic energy is what matters most ( of course, it could result it higher ricochet chances ).
@CorporalWojak since KE = 1/2 (mass*velocity)squared, a heavier, faster shell will be the best. But the heavier a shell gets, the harder it is to speed it up so some tank designs have a smaller, faster shell in order to save space in the crew compartment, a (usually) lighter gun breech and barrel, and ease of loading if it doesn’t have an autoloader
+1@CorporalWojak it is not a balance like you said. I will admit it will probably be less kinetic energy in total bc it’s most likely a similar velocity and weight/material.
+1However, a shell that weighs 20kg traveled at 1000m/s, it would have the same KE as a 30kg shell going 816m/s. Velocity is very important for a smaller shell that weighs less. It is more aerodynamic so it can maintain high speeds for longer.
@wasbir dude your account is gonna blow up if you keep making quality builds and socialize. Get some friends that will upvote your posts and you upvote theirs, it works well
+1@SleepyKitty lol i hope
@SleepyKitty ohhh ok
@Kerbango so exactly what I said.
+1@Kerbango 🦵🍑
@wasbir yeah the super maneuverable Sukhoi jets are very hard to make fuselage-wise. The nose pointing downward and having a rise in the middle is very tricky
+1Very nice looking
+1Just looked at your account and this is your first post in a year!
First! Nice build
@Tingly06822 but really that’s awesome bro. Idk what those acronyms mean 💀
+1