ye, check the filament temperatures, width, and maybe what width your slicing software is set to.
(does the base/first layer break off of where it was printed while printing, or is it firmly secure on the moving plate thing?)
Watch me accidentally blast past a hostile ship at 57 Km/s closing speed because I was on a reciprocal orbit and had my radar off because I was working a contact passively.
.
Also, question:
How do we detect, track, and target hostiles? There is no atmosphere in space, so in theory radar will reach almost infinitely farther, but at the same time so will optical sensors. Would we be able to have literally a souped up space telescope be a cheap alternative to a massive radar? Like a mechanical radar but with a telescope? IDK much about all this.
.
What are the engagement ranges? If we can detect a ship from thousands of kilometers away, can we launch a missile or kinetic kill vehicle and let it coast and maneuver as needed over a few hours?
@Boeing727200F
yuppers, that's the one
I had the anti sight on my M4A1 too lol, but it was the canted one. I usually just used an ACOG or EOTech as my main optic
Question:
Is this project for near-future mostly small realistic ships with "missiles," countermeasures, radar, decoys, retrograde engines, realistic orbital mechanics, and all that jazz, or more Star-Wars-ie like massive fleets with powerful ion-style engines, warp drives, laser bolts, anti-gravity, and such stuff?
Ah, Mr. @Graingy. A snake issue, hm? Quite a departure from my area of expertise, but I shall attempt to meet your request nonetheless.
Might I recommend the Remington defensive model 870? It is a tried and true platform, versatile and adaptable, only limited by the one who wields it. This specific example is equipped with a RMR on a riser, for rapid target acquisition and reduced time to target.
(I have no idea what I’m talking about)
@CrestelAeronautics
I assure you that the concept is being developed and explored, albeit very slowly. Don’t expect anything too fancy, it will probably just be a static model, and might have a moving head that scans the sky and instrument panel if everything works out.
I believe one of the highest part count crafts is a late WWII-esque ship with 22,000 parts and only like 100,000 performance cost. 500,000 performance cost may only be possible with a NASA supercomputer
@AnotherRB
that is a very good point I did not consider before posting this, I'll clarify it in the description and hopefully not be yeeted by the moderators.
Thank you!
A few questions for potential archiving purposes/qualification
what's the goal here?
Shenanigans? Realism? Something else?
What theoretical era/years will this conflict occur in?
What was the build-up and diplomatic failure that led to the declaration of war, or what other even kicked off the Crestan Conflict?
Harbor Freight probably has what you are looking for.
sure @CrestelAeronautics
The inital one will be a single seater, but I'll put it in my notes to do a 2-seat as well.
yes indeed my friend @CrestelAeronautics
I hope to make a low observable one as well
Howdy!
Yes, go for it! Have fun. @STEAMYcrosby
If possible, could I be tagged as well so I can listen/eavesdrop?
k.
Howdy, can I modify this?
violence.
I am very jealous
Have fun
no, unfortunately. You can't just upgrade a 4th gen to a 5th gen. It'd still be a 4th gen (4.5), but with a few RCS reducing features.
What
I’ll ping you on the unlisted post
Capybapy
what
10-4
ye, check the filament temperatures, width, and maybe what width your slicing software is set to.
(does the base/first layer break off of where it was printed while printing, or is it firmly secure on the moving plate thing?)
If that’s ERA armor I’m going to come to your house and steal your front door
Bronco?
Watch me accidentally blast past a hostile ship at 57 Km/s closing speed because I was on a reciprocal orbit and had my radar off because I was working a contact passively.
.
Also, question:
How do we detect, track, and target hostiles? There is no atmosphere in space, so in theory radar will reach almost infinitely farther, but at the same time so will optical sensors. Would we be able to have literally a souped up space telescope be a cheap alternative to a massive radar? Like a mechanical radar but with a telescope? IDK much about all this.
.
What are the engagement ranges? If we can detect a ship from thousands of kilometers away, can we launch a missile or kinetic kill vehicle and let it coast and maneuver as needed over a few hours?
I’m broke, can’t afford a real gun for a while. I plan on getting a .22 in a few years. Maybe I’ll slap the Anti sight on it. @Ashdenpaw1
@Boeing727200F
yuppers, that's the one
I had the anti sight on my M4A1 too lol, but it was the canted one. I usually just used an ACOG or EOTech as my main optic
10-4
Question:
Is this project for near-future mostly small realistic ships with "missiles," countermeasures, radar, decoys, retrograde engines, realistic orbital mechanics, and all that jazz, or more Star-Wars-ie like massive fleets with powerful ion-style engines, warp drives, laser bolts, anti-gravity, and such stuff?
perhaps, but I can't sell you a stick
Ah, Mr. @Graingy. A snake issue, hm? Quite a departure from my area of expertise, but I shall attempt to meet your request nonetheless.
Might I recommend the Remington defensive model 870? It is a tried and true platform, versatile and adaptable, only limited by the one who wields it. This specific example is equipped with a RMR on a riser, for rapid target acquisition and reduced time to target.
(I have no idea what I’m talking about)
like Lowes or something, idk
maybe amazon
a very big vacuum cleaner
What on earth is that
@CrestelAeronautics
I assure you that the concept is being developed and explored, albeit very slowly. Don’t expect anything too fancy, it will probably just be a static model, and might have a moving head that scans the sky and instrument panel if everything works out.
@CrestelAeronautics
I’m a perfectionist and I can’t figure out how to model realistic ears
highest performance cost I could find with a quick search
I believe one of the highest part count crafts is a late WWII-esque ship with 22,000 parts and only like 100,000 performance cost. 500,000 performance cost may only be possible with a NASA supercomputer
What on earth?
even this isn't enough
WE NEED MORE
:(
@AnotherRB
that is a very good point I did not consider before posting this, I'll clarify it in the description and hopefully not be yeeted by the moderators.
Thank you!
Give Monarchii and WarningStar lemons next
A few questions for potential archiving purposes/qualification
what's the goal here?
Shenanigans? Realism? Something else?
What theoretical era/years will this conflict occur in?
What was the build-up and diplomatic failure that led to the declaration of war, or what other even kicked off the Crestan Conflict?
oh gosh, here we go again
Congratulations! Your country has won free democracy!
Please do not resist.
~2020 Chevrolet Traverse
Here we go gentlemen, sink her!
No…
@AlbertaAviator
Would you be alright if I uploaded as an unfinished product in the near future? It’s missing some details and sequences.
@DatFiat126Guy19
Yes sir @IAmMeObviously
Why am I following this post??? I guess I’ll spotlight it too
grind
@oldmate52 I just checked the newest section right after you posted and immediately recognized the planform. Great job!
Toodles friend! We wish you the best of luck on your future endeavors!