@Escaloplatross yes. I will. I have to update this because I forget the brake flaps too. I am busy at the moment but I will note your comment- thank you
Building this 60m (nearly 190ft) monster gives me new experience with managing wing flaps, fuselage issues. I did this to join my own Cold War challenge. All are welcome to join. Please visit my page for details.
Here is my suggestion: in most cases, the back seat is a bit higher than the front- so the pilot at the back also get a clear vision. 2, wing tip usually are narrower than the wing roots. The length of this aircraft also will improve the stability issues. Overall it is a nice one
I am joining my own Cold War challenge to support all of you who are joining the challenge. Welcome to join - Have Fun!
@Memems4life @Brololxd Thank you!
I love it so much, the double fuselage, interior lights, loading door,, all so cool
I am supporting this challenge since it is meaningful and interesting. I will join if I can. At least a spotlight for you this time
+2nice one
@Hermanj welcome
Thank you friends, for your Upvotes. I was redesigning the my previous build, the Sukhoi SU-5 replica - Mixed power airplane Jet+ Piston engined which looks too short and stubby according to it's blueprint.
@CR929thenewSPplayer Yes, please do. I will be glad to see that. I am going to build, but no plan to start yet. So do it.
I remember that his dream and bids flying - it was so artistic that Miyazaki drew the animation for that movie - I am a big fan of "The Winds Rises"
+1This fighter looks short, stubby and looks ugly- but that is how I follow the blueprint.
@ErraticFire17 You can submit a better one, still have time to work if you want to
great. love to see such forgotten designs. upvoted and spotlighted!
+1Plane flying without a pilot looks weared. Can SP add pilot like adding Astronaut in SimpleRocket?
@AnomalyYeet lol, this story is fictional. This plane doesn’t exist. The real one is my previous build;Sukhoi Su-5
awesome, ,, F27 was my childhood friend
+1@Zaineman, check out the story what I wrote... lol
tag me once you are back
@TheTomatoLover Thank you
+1nice little ones
+1wow I was away for a while and need to catch up with your builds
+1@MAPA Thank you buddy also @CL125
Awesome. I like this concept. Spotlighted and upvoted
Very nice
@Escaloplatross yes. I will. I have to update this because I forget the brake flaps too. I am busy at the moment but I will note your comment- thank you
+1@Zaineman lol.
Nice
@Planebuilder2123 I have written how I will judge, please read the description on the challenge page. All planes will be judged after the deadline.
@Bryan5 Sorry Bryan - that was auto-corrected on my keyboard
+1@TASTEinc Yes, correct - Myasishchev m-50. Bryan had mentioned
@GUEVANAERONAUTICS Yes, This is my PSM fighter Savorich-Sav-123-Mark-I - If you want to see more, my friend @Zaineman is one of the best PSM maker
@MrCOPTY no
+1@GUEVANAERONAUTICS sorry. It's a typo error - sense
@Ytcaptainjeffthepilot1234 you will see it when you reach 2000 points. 😝
@Mastereldo that's right
@Bryan5 congratulations! You are fast. Lol
+1@Bryan5 Exactly! You got 3 ups
+1@HamburgerGriller76 ha ha good try.
@DnzimBR do the screen recording (I used iPad) , then edit it on iMovie or AdobeRush (use any editing tool). Then publish on YouTube.
+1Building this 60m (nearly 190ft) monster gives me new experience with managing wing flaps, fuselage issues. I did this to join my own Cold War challenge. All are welcome to join. Please visit my page for details.
Posting soon I finish.
T for tag.
@Planebuilder2123 nice. Keep it up. Upvoted and spotlighted
Name this Cold War era plane correctly will get 3 upvotes! Hurry up - 1St person only
Amazing control. Great job. @Zaineman check this out
+1Very nice. Keep it up. Thicker vertical stabilizer will make more sense
+1@windshifter1 very nice. Can’t wait to see
Very accurate. Great work.
Great job. Spotlighted and upvoted at once!
Nice. Thanks for joining
+3Great job. Spotlighted and upvoted at once!
Here is my suggestion: in most cases, the back seat is a bit higher than the front- so the pilot at the back also get a clear vision. 2, wing tip usually are narrower than the wing roots. The length of this aircraft also will improve the stability issues. Overall it is a nice one
+1@PUMPKINSIDD nice.