@Sockdragger I have tried the script, but it doesn't work for me. So far, I prefer VTOL+ fixed engine power. I guess you could make a new version with your script out of it. I appreciate your input, though.
@Someonefun, answering your question about how I did my "freehand builds": I got some ideas by sketching like this, and I even ran a challenge out of this idea. The best one is in SP Showcase video now
@Someonefun great, now you get it. The blue one was a raw. And this is finished one. There is also and older version which is more closer to the original blue one
Small utility aircraft with tri-motor VTOL configuration. Special made for carrier support and NAVY use. Designed by Win’sWings. Currently it has only 84 parts . I am tuning the flight performance and may be adding some more details.Coming soon for the VTOL lovers- T for tag.
@AvocadoSeams Ah, it is a fictional name. Not the real "Nakajima (modern day Subaru), Oh well, I will change it back to Nakajima, too confusing otherwise - Thank you any way.
He is so cute
oooooo so excited, can't wait to play
+1@HorizonTech5 I will upgrade to a 200-300 parts detailed one later
@TASTEinc Lol, not this one though
Lol, cute
@BOSKnight, I will post it soon after some minor tweaks
+1@KolyAsDona Read this "how to make Auto-spawn" Forum written by MAPA at this link
nice
+1@Chaimber0825 Read this "how to make Auto-spawn" Forum written by MAPA at this link
+1@Sockdragger I have tried the script, but it doesn't work for me. So far, I prefer VTOL+ fixed engine power. I guess you could make a new version with your script out of it. I appreciate your input, though.
@am096 thanks, I was a bit busy with my daily life, and I haven't committed to another challenge. But I would love to do some time in the future
+1@IQinventory Thank you! And @RepublicofWrightIsles, yes, filling up the MAPAs gap
+1This is a fantastic steampunk design.
I have made a quick fix for you, no mods, just with physics only.
+1@AviationLoverGEEK444 thanks
+2@Sockdragger That's how I passed people, and someone will pass me too. That's fine. You will not need until 2050, may be in 2-3 years
Congrats on the Gold! Thanks for sharing the insight on XML editing
@Sockdragger, thank you so much for your input. I will test it and let you know. And also, will add the credit if I use it.
@Sockdragger, I was balancing the engine power while watching the CoM
Lots of details,
@Someonefun, answering your question about how I did my "freehand builds": I got some ideas by sketching like this, and I even ran a challenge out of this idea. The best one is in SP Showcase video now
@someonefun this is older version
@Someonefun great, now you get it. The blue one was a raw. And this is finished one. There is also and older version which is more closer to the original blue one
@Someonefun how can I explain? I have the picture of the plane in my mind to build
@Someonefun ? That is the finished plane
@Someonefun thanks, you asked me for tag, so I tagged
@Someonefun you ask me for tag, so
@someonefun this plane was posted a while ago
This plane was posted here
Small utility aircraft with tri-motor VTOL configuration. Special made for carrier support and NAVY use. Designed by Win’sWings. Currently it has only 84 parts . I am tuning the flight performance and may be adding some more details.Coming soon for the VTOL lovers- T for tag.
Good luck with your challenge. Your tanks are phenomenal! Spotlighted!
+1@dabestsock Yes, it started as McDonnell Douglas DC-9 in the 60s
classic,
This is a great idea. nice job - @Apollo018362 thanks
+1Great work. So fun to fly
+1I love the planes created in the early days of SP. they are so creative and genuine
+1This is very enjoyable to fly. Great concept
so excited to see this - hope to get an iPad version soon
nice
+1good job
oops, I thought it was a ..... a....
That is neat
+1wow
+1Great build, so many details.
+1nice work
+1wow wow nice show. great editing
+1good staff
That’s amazing details. I am glad that you are back
@AvocadoSeams Ah, it is a fictional name. Not the real "Nakajima (modern day Subaru), Oh well, I will change it back to Nakajima, too confusing otherwise - Thank you any way.
@Boeing727200F Wow that is fast
+1