109k WalrusAircraft Comments

  • The Flying Bee 9.8 years ago

    Thank you very much! @JS311

  • AeroEngineering T-50 9.8 years ago

    @AeroEngineering - congratulations on getting this out. I'm very happy to see this, and glad I could help you out!

  • Walrus Prop - Fixed Position Version 9.8 years ago

    Looks good! @FlyingWingsGMBH

  • Lockheed Super Constellation L1649 9.8 years ago

    I think you are the only other builder who is using my big block technique. I like this plane and how you spent all those hours getting the angles right. Few people here know how much work that is. This is the first time I've torn open a plane in many months to look inside. Nice job.

  • Walrus Prop - Fixed Position Version 9.8 years ago

    I didn't know that. If you pull the engine off the mount you can rotate it. I've also left the nozzles in the center, so you can get it to spin if you add a VTOL engine, and if you pull out that prop just a bit and bull back the rear body piece. @Gelodicus

  • PPM co. 7 series E-310 9.8 years ago

    Without looking my only comment is that your tail needs to be bigger. Do you have flaps on the plane? @FighterCrafter14

  • Walrus Prop - Fixed Position Version 9.8 years ago

    @JoeAdkinson13 @BardofBricks - Very kind of you guys. Thank you for the nice words.

  • Walrus Prop - Fixed Position Version 9.8 years ago

    @Cedy117 - Not sure about the challenge. On second thought, it might not be very interesting for people. Forget I brought it up.

  • Walrus Prop - Fixed Position Version 9.8 years ago

    @AnarchistAerospaceIndustries - Yes I can, but I'm curious what parts you are having trouble with. Are you using iOS? I have another request from @Cedy117 for a roundel, so it will have to wait until after I get that done.

  • Walrus Prop - Fixed Position Version 9.8 years ago

    @AeroEngineering - That's interesting. How is your plane coming along?

  • Cessna T50 9.8 years ago

    Nice cockpit, exterior and description.

  • Walrus Prop - Fixed Position Version 9.8 years ago

    @Authros thanks man!

  • Walrus Prop - Fixed Position Version 9.8 years ago

    Ping me when you finish it :-) @XVIindustries

  • Walrus Prop - Fixed Position Version 9.8 years ago

    Holy cow! You are close to 50K in points. @SpiritusRaptor

  • Walrus Prop - Fixed Position Version 9.8 years ago

    I appreciate your offer, but I've got a few other projects lined up. I hope people participate in your challenge, even if I can't. Maybe Walrus Jr. will participate. @Ktay45

  • Walrus Prop - Fixed Position Version 9.8 years ago

    Yes, you should share that aircraft with the world. It is quite fun to fly around. @AeroEngineering

  • M1 Abrams v1.0 9.8 years ago

    This is pretty amazing dude!

  • North American P-51D V 2.0 9.8 years ago

    Nice job. Flys very well.

  • Walrus Prop - Fixed Position Version 9.8 years ago

    You should make a challenge with this. :-) @Cedy117

  • Don't Rate - Helping User 9.8 years ago

    Let me know if you need more help. I need to get back to some testing I'm not allowed to talk about. @AeroEngineering

  • Don't Rate - Helping User 9.8 years ago

    I did, and my first thought was "cool!"
    I would not attempt it since toy will go squirrelly with the angles in XML. @AeroEngineering

  • Don't Rate - Helping User 9.8 years ago

    Ugh... forgot how to make links work...

  • Don't Rate - Helping User 9.8 years ago

    @AeroEngineering - OK it is up and I changed quite a bit to make it look and fly well. [http://www.simpleplanes.com/a/59606u/AeroEngineering-WalrusAircraft]

  • CITY DESTROYER!!! 9.8 years ago

    This is worthy of a tip of my hat!

  • The Flying Bee 9.8 years ago

    Thank you. And you plane from last week looks good. I'll try it out later. @NovaTopaz

  • Don't Rate - Helping User 9.8 years ago

    Sorry I was working late. I'll upload as soon as I get home today. @AeroEngineering

  • The Flying Bee 9.8 years ago

    It looks huge! I'll try to fly later today. @XVIindustries

  • Don't Rate - Helping User 9.8 years ago

    Good question. I don't know how those old engines worked. The double wasp engines of WW II did not spin. Check out YouTube to see how the worked. Kind of cool. @AeroEngineering

  • Don't Rate - Helping User 9.8 years ago

    @AeroEngineering - BTW, if you use a throw away email, I can just email you the XML. Easier than posting...

  • Don't Rate - Helping User 9.8 years ago

    @AeroEngineering - I basically got it working. I removed the extra jet engine, removed the flaps because they were behind the COM, added two small props again at 20X power, increased the length of wings, and added a fuel tank with -2000 lbs just above the cab. It is rough and I'd like to play with it more. This is basically the second plane I was going to build. :-) I was going to do a single prop, but Jr. wanted a bi-plane. I can share back to you after I sort out the kinks, but it seems to work. Are you in a rush to get this out?

  • balloomber 9.8 years ago

    This is perfectly amazing on all levels.

  • The Flying Bee 9.8 years ago

    @alstar308 @NotBoeing - thanks for your support, guys!

  • Don't Rate - Helping User 9.8 years ago

    I was on the phone for several hours and could not test. I promise to test tomorrow! @AeroEngineering

  • The Flying Bee 9.8 years ago

    Only when you want clean lines and less drag. @Dynimerous

  • The Flying Bee 9.8 years ago

    It was late and I reused my torpedo bomber body. In hindsight I should have used a single wheel an fixed front wheels. @Dynimerous

  • Don't Rate - Helping User 9.8 years ago

    OK I see it and will look at it after dinner. @AeroEngineering

  • The Flying Bee 9.8 years ago

    Thank you for the kind words, gentlemen. @Nickasaurus @SkipperBing

  • The Flying Bee 9.8 years ago

    Thank you, sir! @SpiritusRaptor

  • The Flying Bee 9.8 years ago

    Sure... Just give me a link to the work @AeroEngineering

  • The Flying Bee 9.8 years ago

    Not a new part (but thanks for the compliment). It was blood sweat and tears working the XML to shape everything by hand. About 9 hours worth of time on the engine. @DeezDucks

  • The Flying Bee 9.8 years ago

    @AeroEngineering - this plane has some serious power since it is big. I think the front engine is 3x power, and there are two hidden old style small props in the body, each at 20x power. I can remove them for you if you like. Oh, I also gave a VTOL engine hidden at 1% power to turn the Pistons.

  • The Flying Bee 9.8 years ago

    @goboygo1 @RAF1 @XVIindustries - thanks guys. I tried to copy the Gnome engine design. To be honest, it was a huge amount of work to get this looking and working right. At least 7 hours on the engine alone.

  • The Flying Bee 9.8 years ago

    Thanks Andrew. I still owe you some files. @AndrewGarrison

  • The Flying Bee 9.8 years ago

    Yes, search Google for "Gnome rotary engine startup" and watch the video. @mattmck

  • The Flying Bee 9.8 years ago

    @Cedy117 @Me600 @Stingray @FlOu @BardofBricks - Good morning / evening folks. Thanks for your support!

  • Can Somebody please make me an RCAF roundel ! 9.8 years ago

    Well, I am Canadian, so I should do this... I have a busy week ahead of me, so let me consider this. @Cedy117

  • McDonnell Douglas F-15 - SR 9.8 years ago

    Being a father / son team sometimes we each think the other upvoted a great plane. Sorry for being late to the party.

  • SolarFlare 9.8 years ago

    Sweet paint job!

  • The Flying Bee 9.8 years ago

    @jheffernan - Thanks man. I'm off to bed now, but I hope you enjoy flying it.