@SchmooveBrain you joined in 1952, I remember this.. but, then again…. Idk I am just sayin, 135mm on a tank that is ment to be fast, light, and carry troops, anti armor, etc, is not at all realistic for 1956/8
@MiGlover when the last tank concept is finished, and trials begin, then the winner is chosen, Then you can purchase tanks. But, for now, do you want some MBT-70’s?
@SleepyKitty wdym realism..? The Swiss, Who built this plane’s IRL counterpart, didn’t have jets until the very late 60’s. This plane, wasn’t ment to fight modern planes. It was designed for WW2, used in the 1950’s. And the usefulness is completely irrelevant, as you or I might think. Useful could mean a lot of things.
@SchmooveBrain you joined in 1952, I remember this.. but, then again…. Idk I am just sayin, 135mm on a tank that is ment to be fast, light, and carry troops, anti armor, etc, is not at all realistic for 1956/8
+1You should make a taglist! I want to be on it!
I like the space ships. They are a nice change from planes and tanks.
@SchmooveBrain @AugustVonMartis BUT 135mm AT A 75 DEGREE ANGLE, ON AN IFV, IN 1956?!?!!?!
+1@AugustVonMartis according to the RP forum, it is 1956
+1@SchmooveBrain I know. But, GEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEzzzzzz
@AugustVonMartis No. also, 135mm of armor, on an IFV, in 1956
@voytek no. You have no use, or testing abilities.
@AugustVonMartis yes. The autoloaders I have, are the best in the world.
+1@SchmooveBrain @AugustVonMartis why do it have 135 millimeters of frontal plate armor
I can make the cockpits if you want.
+1@AugustVonMartis You do realize… hold on… is this an artillery..?
@AugustVonMartis so either you tell me how you got them, or I remove your land contract and funding from existing.
+1@AugustVonMartis I am Yourpan. I didn’t give you access to the autoloaders.
@MiGlover ok.
@MiGlover No warheads.
@AugustVonMartis … I am asking, how did you get them.
+1@M109simp you can do links by doing this:
+1[Take the “*”’s out]
(Name of the plane)[link of said plane]
~5/10
Nice! What happened?
It’s where higher point users show other users, or the ones that follow them, a cool plane.
+1I can help tomorrow.
Ok
@SamuelHayden what is your PFP..?!?
+1@AugustVonMartis How.
+1Like I am pretty sure I am the only one with mention of them, starting in ~1949
+1@ThomasRoderick she asked about it
+2@MiGlover uhhhh I forgot, but I can make a deal, 1,000 for 40 million.
Hold on… how’d you get autoloaders..?
+1Make sure you ask before using people’s builds, Its just common courtesy.
Tags 9: @DestAsimpleplanemaker @AugustVonMartis @haohao2008202210
+1Tags 8: @AegisElectric @Sleevefifties50 @COM9927
Tags 7: @YarisSedan @Chaseracliot @SumateraIndustries
Tags 6: @pulmoscorpus @FlaneFancy1235 @DISHWASHER2005
Tags 5: @YarisHatchback @BigMoose017 @SPWithLizzie
Tags 4: @Republicofwrightisles @SuperSoli8 @Kea0806
Tags 3: @SuperSuperTheSylph @RiechrichDeutsch @SchmooveBrain
Tags 2: @SupremeSpeed25 @Halcyon215 @Deeganwithabazooka
Tags: @CrestelAeronautics @Cuboidable @keiyronelleavgeek566
@MiGlover when the last tank concept is finished, and trials begin, then the winner is chosen, Then you can purchase tanks. But, for now, do you want some MBT-70’s?
Yeah… wings tend to do that in SP….
+1@Supersoli8 no. Code a fully functional government
Fully functional Funky trees government
This will be awesome. But, I hope that some customization of the face would be cool.
@Boeing727200F fr
@Schmoovebrain this chonker of FT
@SleepyKitty welllllll skinny wings+long pencil body+ smooth front cockpit=SU-25/F-104 mix
@SleepyKitty wdym realism..? The Swiss, Who built this plane’s IRL counterpart, didn’t have jets until the very late 60’s. This plane, wasn’t ment to fight modern planes. It was designed for WW2, used in the 1950’s. And the usefulness is completely irrelevant, as you or I might think. Useful could mean a lot of things.
@SleepyKitty ngl, it looks like a F-104 too
@SleepyKitty also, my “style” that I use is simple.. [I.E. no fuselage wings and little XML]