@BogdanX although you would need more than just one spoiler here because of the change in dihedral and wing flex. Also, what picture do you see the spoilers in?
@ACEPILOT109 the drag points should be less than a tenth of what they are. That will allow you to reduce engine power and keep the top speed(It will be a drastic difference with every drag point you remove as drag is proportional to the square of airspeed). Then, simply add dead weight and your TWR should be close to the 1.1 or 1.2 to 1 you should have. Not ummm 13 to 1
Come on, a gyro? You could have gotten pitch and yaw with the main thrusters, and simply add RCS thrusters for the roll. Also, the engines are extremely overpowered... I can do a 30' suicide burn from terminal velocity--
Should not be too difficult to create an equation for this. IDK where you are in math currently, but you could create a system of equations, then combine them into one. I need paper to do math though and to explain it right
@Vincent_ that led me down a rabbit hole of Tom Scott saying dumb things;
"This is a Dasani water"
"The road behind me is closed"
"And it all goes to crap"
Translation:
I like short Japanese animated films and I know you do not like that about me.
.
I like this. I wish you had added more dials and digital numbers.
.
Die.
.
I guess I will upvote this anyway.
@rexzion you cant flair like that. And overwing engine would be too high above the CoM for realisticness, underwing would be too view-obstructing. Although underneath the truss could have worked mediocrely
@BogdanX although you would need more than just one spoiler here because of the change in dihedral and wing flex. Also, what picture do you see the spoilers in?
@realSavageMan let's just say I agree with you
Could I see the P-59? I might or might not use it though
@TheLurkingVexedVortex yes you are
@KnightOfRen dam you
@SnoWFLakE0s but then it would think it is already pointed at you, unless it uses rate of longitude/latitude instead of heading.
@DJ2keroni thank you :)
CREDIT TO ME FOR THAT WONDERFUL VIKING!!!
(Pin this) Link here.
@BagelPlane lol idek what happens on my CRJ because it's too laggy. My Viking SHOULD have structural wings tho...
Unless if your going for RC
@rexzion precisely
@ACEPILOT109 the drag points should be less than a tenth of what they are. That will allow you to reduce engine power and keep the top speed(It will be a drastic difference with every drag point you remove as drag is proportional to the square of airspeed). Then, simply add dead weight and your TWR should be close to the 1.1 or 1.2 to 1 you should have. Not ummm 13 to 1
Come on, a gyro? You could have gotten pitch and yaw with the main thrusters, and simply add RCS thrusters for the roll. Also, the engines are extremely overpowered... I can do a 30' suicide burn from terminal velocity--
@asteroidbook345 lol
Yeah do the wingtips but skip the belly crap. You could put them underwing like asteroid says. But make the canopy bigger bruh
Should not be too difficult to create an equation for this. IDK where you are in math currently, but you could create a system of equations, then combine them into one. I need paper to do math though and to explain it right
Beautiful work here.
+1@LieutenantSOT I'm in the same boat
+1@EchoWhiskey11 yep
+1@tsampoy very nice of you
@Spenzerointernational "so here you go"
+1@rexzion what
Cessna 172 wing = 747 slat
+2@AN2Felllla imagine theres controls ok lol
@UsualPiooneer remember when you were fing bronze
@UsualPiooneer I am 240 away from you lmao
@UsualPiooneer 40 upvotes from him
@UsualPiooneer dang it you are far ahead now. I'll get rexzion tho
@UsualPiooneer awwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww
@UsualPiooneer like you
awwww
@Vincent_ that led me down a rabbit hole of Tom Scott saying dumb things;
"This is a Dasani water"
"The road behind me is closed"
"And it all goes to crap"
@Cyieed462 sometimes milk... it just becomes too... absorbing
+2Translation:
+1I like short Japanese animated films and I know you do not like that about me.
.
I like this. I wish you had added more dials and digital numbers.
.
Die.
.
I guess I will upvote this anyway.
@Cyieed462 hey kid
Hey loving the Tom Scott
Plus, this way you could add independent suspensions onto each node as well, that might be cool
+4@tsampoy I will whip you if you insult me once more
@asteroidbook345 easy fix
maxRpm = 100000lol but yes we need it@rexzion a bit. Also your head would get very hot
@rexzion you cant flair like that. And overwing engine would be too high above the CoM for realisticness, underwing would be too view-obstructing. Although underneath the truss could have worked mediocrely
@Homemade1 well I mean you could trash that and make it SP?
This was actually a nice plane... flies trash tho
@Lanc you have noooo idea. Maybe @ErgitheMobilefriendlyf can inform you on the last abomination of an airchair
@AnIndonesianGuy lol
+1The numbers on top of the wing are too big and the black on the wing is too dark!
+1imagine being nitpicky
Ooh I could build a Bush Fox to match!
+1@Hedero lol yeah I saw the predecessor
Thought you were dead there for a while
Glad to know I am safe
@trios21 Mars rovers are extremely difficult