@WarHawk95 aight I threw it through Google Translate
"Pose destroy USS Beast instantly. The aim is not very accurate so you should aim a few millimeters down or up depending on the angle you are shooting. To fire 1 to move trim and VTOL"
Last time I checked that Tiger was taken back from the Japanese before ever leaving due to the Normandy landings. And apparently the P-47 can't carry torpedoes.
The C-16B isn't even a military plane. Neither is the SAR-77. In fact the Star is the propeller C-16. What use does a propeller seaplane from the 70's even have as a torpedo fighter rather than something like a Search And Rescue aircraft or a Cargo plane. Not everything can be made better by adding torpedos.
@PlaneSmith it's honestly a tradition. I generally write a story around whatever I build and have slowly been constructing a canon out of them. Some results have been good, and others... less so.
@Murks basically it has a severe issue of either nosediving at 350mph or front flipping at lower speeds, and I can't think of a way to stop that without Gyro's
@JamesBoA yes. I think some as old as the FT17 ended up being called Beutepanzer and used for internal security. To my knowledge the British MK4 never received the designation, as serving for 20 minutes before being piledrived by 15 RussianT34's doesn't warrant it.
@enzoBoeing757 stealing would literally be repainting the original creation. I chose to do a BT-67 over a DC-3 because the BT would actually require me to build a successor with changes over some paint. I fully credit @pancelvonat for the original airframe, but the lengthened fuselage and turboprop engines are all changes I personally made to reflect differences featured on the actual Basler BT 67. I didn't mention pancelvonat in my description due to the presence of the auto credit system, giving me less pre-requisites when writing the description. If you still find issues with me, I'd prefer to discuss this in my twitter DM's (@NINTEND0SH). Thank you for your concern.
I'm not surprised this doesn't fly well. In War Thunder it took less than 10 minutes for me to violently plow into the ground because the wings tore off.
This is the only other single prop of this size and I'm going to admit you've done a very good job. Actually actually worried about what this is gonna do to my entry.
I play a lot of War thunder and I honestly love this thing. It has an excellent Power to weight ratio and a fairly good gun for its battle rating. Love to see more people recognise the Czechpanzer.
@WarHawk95 aight I threw it through Google Translate
"Pose destroy USS Beast instantly. The aim is not very accurate so you should aim a few millimeters down or up depending on the angle you are shooting. To fire 1 to move trim and VTOL"
Last time I checked that Tiger was taken back from the Japanese before ever leaving due to the Normandy landings. And apparently the P-47 can't carry torpedoes.
@CMAircraftManufacture I pulled up too hard at about 900mph and the aircraft went into an uncontrollable spin.
Tried to land and it burst into flames but it's not like a couple of my creations are any better.
(Immediately crashes into the ocean)
@Gameboi14 the guy didn't harp on the fact that I'm a furry, but instead just hit my sexuality. Complete idiot
Apparently hated on me when I released a Dev version of an aircraft. IDK wasn't there
What in the name of god did I miss?
Y'all better like this because it took me 10 days to get enough energy to design another plane.
T
The C-16B isn't even a military plane. Neither is the SAR-77. In fact the Star is the propeller C-16. What use does a propeller seaplane from the 70's even have as a torpedo fighter rather than something like a Search And Rescue aircraft or a Cargo plane. Not everything can be made better by adding torpedos.
@Dale200101 I'm the guy who built 2 Toby replicas so what do you expect
@PlaneSmith it's honestly a tradition. I generally write a story around whatever I build and have slowly been constructing a canon out of them. Some results have been good, and others... less so.
Ah yes. The literal only canon plane in Fallout that actually flys
If you stick this next to the C-16 at a 90* angle they'd fit in the exact same area
@JamesBoA oddly enough I only did that because it was easier and simpler. And I gotta say it shows. This would've exceeded 100 parts if I used blocks
@Awsomur I'm on IOS but my parents use android so I can't use any of theirs
Can we get a mod free version?
@I got better
@Murks I tried lowering the propellers, as well as several design changes involving a complete design. Nothing worked
@PositivePlanes yes but only slightly
@Murks basically it has a severe issue of either nosediving at 350mph or front flipping at lower speeds, and I can't think of a way to stop that without Gyro's
T
Nice
@JamesBoA this was in 1941. The only comparable allied tank, the Tetrarch, was literally designed to be airdropped
@Armyguy1534 after testing I found twin rotors are not only good but putting a tail rotor on this thing is a recipe for disaster.
@Armyguy1534 well it functions. I mean German helicopters of the same style worked well. I'll probably follow your advice though.
@JamesBoA yes. I think some as old as the FT17 ended up being called Beutepanzer and used for internal security. To my knowledge the British MK4 never received the designation, as serving for 20 minutes before being piledrived by 15 RussianT34's doesn't warrant it.
@Loopy200 as far as I can tell no Tank has been designated "T-71". I was referencing the infamously unreliable German tank
Isn't the name "Panther" already taken?
@Shemes213 why do you think I added "Tarantula Hawk" to the name
I mean darn my Aircraft are bad but at least they can actually take off... sometimes
S
T
What in gods name did you do to the Scorpion
@AWESOMENESS360 the username is in brackets. Whack that into the twitter search bar and i should be the first result
Well let's just say it takes a while to get used to the size. But it is a magnificent build.
Tested against ME-262 4 times. 75% success rate
@Nerfaddict Not gonna lie I was more scared by the idea that my IPad can run a plane nearly the size of the huge bad ship from Star Wars 8
Ok so you're not gonna believe this but my potato of an IPad somehow didn't melt when i was downloading it,
So how long until the plane that I designed as a civilian cruiser crashes and burns like the other 99% of my design
I feel like the guns are a bit far apart but apart from that it's a good fighter
@enzoBoeing757 stealing would literally be repainting the original creation. I chose to do a BT-67 over a DC-3 because the BT would actually require me to build a successor with changes over some paint. I fully credit @pancelvonat for the original airframe, but the lengthened fuselage and turboprop engines are all changes I personally made to reflect differences featured on the actual Basler BT 67. I didn't mention pancelvonat in my description due to the presence of the auto credit system, giving me less pre-requisites when writing the description. If you still find issues with me, I'd prefer to discuss this in my twitter DM's (@NINTEND0SH). Thank you for your concern.
Flew through the USS Beast. Landed on an escort cruiser. 11/10
(Laughs in Bee)
I'm not surprised this doesn't fly well. In War Thunder it took less than 10 minutes for me to violently plow into the ground because the wings tore off.
@TyDillon13GEICO yeah whilst I can't say I suffered that issue, that was during a fuel consumption test on autopilot
@TyDillon13GEICO I shall concede that. If anything your plane has me kinda worried
This is the only other single prop of this size and I'm going to admit you've done a very good job. Actually actually worried about what this is gonna do to my entry.
I play a lot of War thunder and I honestly love this thing. It has an excellent Power to weight ratio and a fairly good gun for its battle rating. Love to see more people recognise the Czechpanzer.