@WarThunderPlayer
oh, wait, that guy, he's an idiot, he blocked people for advertising discord servers even though I never advertised one, he still blocked me because I was in one and he's just a toxic noob who thinks he's the center of the world
@WarThunderPlayer
I'd prefer working on only one vehicle tree in one country, but personally, 7.0 - 8.3 is quite hard seeing it's basically early cold-war and late WW2 vehicles going against vehicles with HEAT-FS like the Leopard 1, so at those BR's, it's good for Germany but not as much for Russia, following however, eventually there's tanks like the T-62 and the T-64A (1971) which are some of the first mbts for the Russian tech tree, I've done a little bit of looking into the T-64A (1971) and at 8.7, it's actually really good because you could be fighting against Leopard 1's in a tank with an auto-loader and APFSDS with something like 7.1 seconds of reload time
@XHL2003
The Tu-160 and B-1 are close in appearance but completely different, none are based on each other and the only people who do claim that are people who think they are, and there's a difference between having something in common and buying rights to reproduce a design from another country, and stay out of a conversation that hasn't directly mentioned you, we're already talking somewhere else and there's no need for you to stick your nose into a different one
@XHL2003
For starters, I'm not jealous of a country that's been harrasing mine, second, your telling me that I'm ignorant as you here assumed me as an American after I've already mentioned I'm Vietnamese repeatedly, JuanAlt knows it's based on the MiG 1.44, Asteroidbook345 knows it too (and is also why I looked into it) and other people who actually do research into it.
@WarThunderPlayer
Yeah, I honestly just know mainly about the Russian tree, so you'll have to do some research for which country you think you could be good at
@WarThunderPlayer
The US tree is entirely Sherman's until you get to something like 6.0, I wouldn't recommend it if you dislike Shermans but yes, it does eventually get better, it's just low-tier that's hard to get through...and yes, the Russian tech tree is pretty good
@WarThunderPlayer
Whatever country suits you best, plan ahead so you know what you want and when you want it, I don't really know about too much nations in-game since I'm always playing the Russians
@WarThunderPlayer
Honestly, I just watch a lot of YT vids (usually from PhlyDaily) and end up copying what he does but of course modifying it to my needs...
@WarThunderPlayer
at 3.3 for Germany, the main thing to do is flanking/ambushing rather than head-on charging, which is also the tactic of many T-34 players
@WarThunderPlayer
Really, you can do any country if you put in a lot of time for the game, I do want to tell you however that I've heard about early American and German ground vehicles being extremely hard to play
@WarThunderPlayer
Russian ground vehicles, it's literally the only thing I play, and I'm not exactly successful seeing that I'm still at battle rating 7.7 and not top tier yet.
@WarThunderPlayer
Tiger H1? Cool! But remember to angle it...
@WarThunderPlayer
just ignore him, might as well block him too for the sake of not having to deal with him in the near future
@WarThunderPlayer
oh, wait, that guy, he's an idiot, he blocked people for advertising discord servers even though I never advertised one, he still blocked me because I was in one and he's just a toxic noob who thinks he's the center of the world
@WarThunderPlayer
which underscore guy? also congrats on getting this in War Thunder
@WarThunderPlayer
uhhhhh, h u m a n
@WarThunderPlayer
Ah, German
Now that's part efficiency
+2@WarThunderPlayer
Ukranian?
@WarThunderPlayer
Sooner or later, too much war thunder tho, lol
I smell infant
Nice furniture
+1"This is the only picture you need to see"
+3I guess this ends the use of my eyes...
@Locurapuntocom
So, a turd in ze toilet ja?
Real Katana > weeb Katana
+2Bri'ish bugger
+1PoopenFärten
I think we know which part of the airship that comes from...
@WarThunderPlayer
Yes, I was aware when I said that
MiG-29 but the cockpit is t h i c c
Goddamn upvote cooldown...
@WarThunderPlayer
Wait, your Russian?
@WarThunderPlayer
+1I'd prefer working on only one vehicle tree in one country, but personally, 7.0 - 8.3 is quite hard seeing it's basically early cold-war and late WW2 vehicles going against vehicles with HEAT-FS like the Leopard 1, so at those BR's, it's good for Germany but not as much for Russia, following however, eventually there's tanks like the T-62 and the T-64A (1971) which are some of the first mbts for the Russian tech tree, I've done a little bit of looking into the T-64A (1971) and at 8.7, it's actually really good because you could be fighting against Leopard 1's in a tank with an auto-loader and APFSDS with something like 7.1 seconds of reload time
@XHL2003
The Tu-160 and B-1 are close in appearance but completely different, none are based on each other and the only people who do claim that are people who think they are, and there's a difference between having something in common and buying rights to reproduce a design from another country, and stay out of a conversation that hasn't directly mentioned you, we're already talking somewhere else and there's no need for you to stick your nose into a different one
@XHL2003
+8For starters, I'm not jealous of a country that's been harrasing mine, second, your telling me that I'm ignorant as you here assumed me as an American after I've already mentioned I'm Vietnamese repeatedly, JuanAlt knows it's based on the MiG 1.44, Asteroidbook345 knows it too (and is also why I looked into it) and other people who actually do research into it.
@WarThunderPlayer
Yeah, I honestly just know mainly about the Russian tree, so you'll have to do some research for which country you think you could be good at
@WarThunderPlayer
Sweden... especially with their STRV-103's (which I really despise of though)
@WarThunderPlayer
The US tree is entirely Sherman's until you get to something like 6.0, I wouldn't recommend it if you dislike Shermans but yes, it does eventually get better, it's just low-tier that's hard to get through...and yes, the Russian tech tree is pretty good
@WarThunderPlayer
Whatever country suits you best, plan ahead so you know what you want and when you want it, I don't really know about too much nations in-game since I'm always playing the Russians
@210100
"Probaly"
Probably underaged, can't even spell smh
+3This is probably more detailed then the Revell model could be, lol
+2@TatsuTheDemonLord
+1Oh, it's a B-50...weeb-maker 9000's younger sibling
Remake when?
g u n
Ah, yes, the weeb-maker 9000 (since 1945)
+3i Phone L-2 Shturmovik
+2@BBCP117
+2Defend The D Point!
@WAR122
Planning on it actually, but I haven't I haven't really played SP in a while...just expect it to happen eventually (or not)
@WarThunderPlayer
Honestly, I just watch a lot of YT vids (usually from PhlyDaily) and end up copying what he does but of course modifying it to my needs...
@WarThunderPlayer
at 3.3 for Germany, the main thing to do is flanking/ambushing rather than head-on charging, which is also the tactic of many T-34 players
POV:
You find your build
(I know I didn't)
+7"A successor of jundroo builds and make some poop build? No! >:P"
I wonder what the white ranks have to say about that...
@WarThunderPlayer
Or you could destroy their gun barrel so they can't shoot, which allows you to drive up to their sides, or shoot the turret ring
@WarThunderPlayer
You could shoot the turrets on T-34s...
@DeltaLCI
A dead body...now that's where my role comes in :D
@WarThunderPlayer
Really, you can do any country if you put in a lot of time for the game, I do want to tell you however that I've heard about early American and German ground vehicles being extremely hard to play
@WarThunderPlayer
Russian ground vehicles, it's literally the only thing I play, and I'm not exactly successful seeing that I'm still at battle rating 7.7 and not top tier yet.
@TheSpartan
+1Square* lol
@Airwarrior
No need to apologize, the post here is the reason why your hardbass isn't playing as loud as it should
@PilotOfFuture
Ok then
@TomTomthebrazil
Or it wasn't properly sealed