@hpgbproductions
Is this with the Conveyor going against it or for it? Because in this scenario the conveyor is running against the plane trying to take off.
@CaptainNoble
The issue is, the conveyor matches the speed of the tires and whatever thrust the engines produce to accelerate the plane will be reflected on the tires cause the tires will spin faster and the moment the the tires spin faster, the conveyor will speed up to counter. So my guess is that the Aircraft will remain static.
BasicAircrafts
+4Damn
@BOEC
Kinda what I was going for.
@SoYouDontHaveTo
Yes then I changed my mind, MKIII won't have that issue.
@ThePropellerPlanesGuy
Thanks
@Tyrell
Did my best here tbh.
Hey, is it possible you could extend the challenge a bit?
I have a jet on the way that I already teased.
+1@YarisSedan
+1Yeah! Have been for a little while now.
Wishlist or concern for SP2?
I've seen that one a few times.
Not really a fan of 6th gen fighters but this looks wonderful!
Hey, you down to help test a build of mine?
@CallsignGizmo
Yeah, it's more natural for me personally.
@PlaneFlightX
+1Yeah that plane might just stay in limbo forever at this rate.
@jamesPLANESii
You live in Australia, just because it's chaotic there doesn't mean everywhere has to be.
@Monarchii
Since you can't see the pictures, just google Gipsy Danger.
@Dissent3R
+1I guess, but still, people have irl lives, we can't really spend all our gaming time on one build.
There's no way someone is gonna sell a highly classified jet on very public website.
+1VEGA industries.
Owned by me and @Quercon
+1I always thought canards and thrust vectoring made things easier.
I could recommend a build you can check out if you want. It has the same setup as the SU-33
I would also like to know.
+1Probably cause he was a curator so they decided to promote the guy. Won't be surprised if he later becomes a dev lol.
Funny enough I had this same idea except for the SU-75 but Goddamn you've put mine to shame.
+1Question, is your name Livingstone irl?
Definitely entering this.
+1@Dissent3R
+1Yeah finally!
@AWESOMENESS360
Well we're fucked. Best start now to find who will lead the revolution against the terminators.
@Pan
+2Damn boy, your doing cars now?
@Axartar
+1No like A.I images struggles with getting fingers right.
Damn girl, your doing cars now?
The title of the forum post looks like it was made by A.I lol.
+1@32
+1Normal User who's mature enough to be a moderator.
@Mahoots
Yup, I'm back building!
First, I'm gonna finish up some old projects before I moved onto something new.
Your best yet.
+1Same here.
@crazyplaness
No need for that, I was wrong, I guess the plane can actually fly?
@MrSilverWolf
Man I miss mythbusters.
@32 @hpgbproductions
Okay so basically no matter how fast the conveyor goes, the plane will fly regardless?
Broo
I was legit getting bullied on Facebook cause of this
So like are you the only curator for now?
+3Did you request to be one?
If so how does it work?
Will there be more?
@hpgbproductions
+1Is this with the Conveyor going against it or for it? Because in this scenario the conveyor is running against the plane trying to take off.
@CaptainNoble
+1The issue is, the conveyor matches the speed of the tires and whatever thrust the engines produce to accelerate the plane will be reflected on the tires cause the tires will spin faster and the moment the the tires spin faster, the conveyor will speed up to counter. So my guess is that the Aircraft will remain static.
Edit
The conveyor belt is running against the direction of the plane trying to take off.
@32
@Quercon
Long time no see, welcome back
+1T
@L1nus
💀💀
Yeah you definitely have a kink for punishment
Anyway tag me when done.
@TheCommentaryGuy
+1Yup, something Linus is very familiar with.
@DOYOUMIND
+1By having a kink for punishment disguised as perfectionism.
@MobileBuilder21
Maybe, it might be like a separate google doc where the link to the doc is in the pinned links forum for easy access.
@Graingy
+1FT yes, I think the VerticalG FT, idk I haven't played around with FT in months.