@AeroTactical Technically yes, but it'd probably be better to dedicate to one side more than the other (e.g. I've made four individual weapons for the M-War II so far, only one of them is reformist whilst the other three are Loyalist).
I recommend joining the Reformists, even though I am a Loyalist, but the Reformists lack numbers right now, as @JSTQ stands alone as the sole guardian of the Reformist movement.
@Monarchii Ohhhhhhhhh
For a second I thought you were gon' do like the A-52 and chuck Kiev at the Reformists or something lol (The A-52, for context, threw an aircraft carrier at the RCF base back during the S-War)
@Monarchii Oh also anti-drone tech is absolutely allowed. The alleged "successor" to the Shock MBT, the Shrike, is loaded with anti-drone systems. I say alleged because the Shock shows no signs of slowing down production or service (current inventory is about 82,000, including some that may not be immediately operational. The Shock is the most produced tank in CSV), meanwhile only one Shrike is known to mankind despite the tank already being well over combat-proven.
@Nerfaddict Well, they shouldn't.
In reality, a railgun should only have the energy and durability to fire a few times at most in a short amount of time, so any realistic railgun shouldn't break the treaty regardless of their one-punch-kill nature.
Looking at the auto-tags/obligatory tags and I'm just realizing how many people are involved in M-War II, this is gonna be the biggest collab of the year lol (I didn't even include some spectators or anyone else joining, since I just referenced one of my earlier M-War II posts)
@AeroTactical Technically yes, but it'd probably be better to dedicate to one side more than the other (e.g. I've made four individual weapons for the M-War II so far, only one of them is reformist whilst the other three are Loyalist).
I recommend joining the Reformists, even though I am a Loyalist, but the Reformists lack numbers right now, as @JSTQ stands alone as the sole guardian of the Reformist movement.
Yooo @JSTQ you've got a teammate now!
@SuperSuperTheSylph ik lol
It looks amazing :D
PEPSI-PLANE!!
Mailing List 5:
@windshifter1
Special Mailing Request:
@Monarchii
Mailing List 4:
@Karroc9522
@SuperSuperTheSylph
@KPLBall
Mailing List 3:
@B1BLancer
@IDK0
@LoganAviation
Mailing List 2:
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26
@YarisSedan
@blt
Mailing List 1:
@TheMouse
@CrestelAeronautics
@PrussianAirlines
@SuperSuperTheSylph PMC...?
@Graingy Understood
Thank you for the resources :D
@Graingy Aite
@Graingy Good
They put canards on the Mirage
@Monarchii The A-52 was pretty much made to accompany the A-40
Need I say more?
@Monarchii Ohhhhhhhhh
For a second I thought you were gon' do like the A-52 and chuck Kiev at the Reformists or something lol (The A-52, for context, threw an aircraft carrier at the RCF base back during the S-War)
@Monarchii Kiev...
YOU'RE GONNA DESTROY THE REFORMISTS WITH A CITY?!
@Monarchii Dude
I haven't even made the inventory list yet
I'm gonna get frickin destroyed
AHHHHHHHHH
@Monarchii I'm in danger lol
@Monarchii But two more weeks (March 15th is the one year anniversary, brace yourself)
@Monarchii This war hasn't even started yet lol
@Graingy In terms of deliveries
@Monarchii Hmmm that would be interesting
@Monarchii Ah true
Unless it's captured...
@Monarchii Ohh ok
@Boeing727200F I am :D
@Nerfaddict Sounds good to me
@Monarchii Oh also anti-drone tech is absolutely allowed. The alleged "successor" to the Shock MBT, the Shrike, is loaded with anti-drone systems. I say alleged because the Shock shows no signs of slowing down production or service (current inventory is about 82,000, including some that may not be immediately operational. The Shock is the most produced tank in CSV), meanwhile only one Shrike is known to mankind despite the tank already being well over combat-proven.
@Nerfaddict Well, they shouldn't.
In reality, a railgun should only have the energy and durability to fire a few times at most in a short amount of time, so any realistic railgun shouldn't break the treaty regardless of their one-punch-kill nature.
@Graingy So far no issues
I would suggest using portals though
I genuinely forgot if I specified, so just to be clear, this is an MDA and therefore Loyalist aircraft.
M-War II Special 3:
@SPSidearm
@Boeing727200F
@SuperSuperTheSylph
M-War II Special:
@Monarchii
@JSTQ
@Dracul0Anderson
Mailing List 4:
@Karroc9522
@SuperSuperTheSylph
@KPLBall
Mailing List 3:
@B1BLancer
@IDK0
@LoganAviation
Mailing List 2:
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26
@YarisSedan
@blt
Mailing List 1:
@TheMouse
@CrestelAeronautics
@PrussianAirlines
Noice
Also I'm just realizing Short Launch is the name not the edition lol (I thought there was like a Short Launch/Medium Launch/Long Launch or smth)
This actually looks pretty cool
Don't remember the last time I saw a trijet
@Graingy Aite thanks :D
@Apollo018362 Yes, it's official
@CrestelAeronautics Hmmmmmmm
Maybe
@JSTQ You could, that would be helpful :D
Just remember that only 3 people can be tagged per comment
Oof...
War Thunder tho
@Graingy Aite, thanks :D
The Stupid Idiot makes a great incendiary weapon btw
@Boeing727200F Pepsi lol
Noice though :D
Looking at the auto-tags/obligatory tags and I'm just realizing how many people are involved in M-War II, this is gonna be the biggest collab of the year lol (I didn't even include some spectators or anyone else joining, since I just referenced one of my earlier M-War II posts)
Mailing List 5:
@windshifter1
M-War II Special:
@MonsNotTheMonster
Mailing List 3:
@B1BLancer
@IDK0
@LoganAviation