@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 @SPsidearm
To further build on FOXHOUND's statement, let's take a look at exactly how tough it is to kill an Enargite VII:
-It has three layers of inch-thick armor all around the tank. And it still has engines and treads strong enough to get it up to 100 mph.
-The Enargite VII took no complete losses during the M-War or TC-War.
-Several Enargite VIIs- not just one special E.VII, several standard ones- also survived multiple nukes to the face, one of which is still operational (as a matter of fact, said Enargite VII, "Fallout," participated in the Fight for Wright).
-To date, it has only had two losses, and even those are debatable since they were both to a literal demon (The Thermonuclear Psychopath), and they were revived shortly after by said evil force, only to be liberated by allies shortly after. So it has lost a single fight (we're counting the two losses as one fight since it was the same moment), but no complete hull losses in combat.
-The E.VII was one of the first, if not the first MGLA (now MDA) tank to defeat the Monarchii's IS-3, which still remained the least-destroyed Monarchii tank of the M-War.
-The Enargite was so good that it was almost considered as a replacement for the Shock. Only numbers and versatility kept the Shock alive, but that may not be the case today thanks to the M49A3-C upgrade.
And yet, all that power and status, and LunarEclipse can casually toss one into the air without breaking a sweat. She could probably defeat any tank, any day. Even the M49A3-C.
@SPsidearm Uhh too late for that
I didn't forget the 2,500 planes attacking Wright, in fact the article is already in the works. It's just that my sleepless schedule is catching up with me... every muscle in my body hurts...
@KPLBall That's true but only to a certain degree; LunarEclipse, alongside SamuelJamesCastor, owns ALL of Snowstone, not just the Ice Base is particular.
@SPsidearm
1. I highly doubt that :v There's been a lot of talk about missiles detecting invisible planes lately, but y'all underestimate the meaning of "invisible," yk.
2. Wait, 5400? For real? The A-13 (first gen attacker) has 1E+32 per panel...
3. I thought those guys were wiped out when they tried to steal my drones (keyword: tried. I'm still living on that mini airfield btw). Guess I'll have to try harder, no?
4. I hate to the reveal the truth, but I'm not into the modern hype honestly. My pilots typically rely on their bare eyes- maybe telescopes- to see targets. Radar jamming will not save him.
@JSTQ Huh. I see.
Well, my issue is this: It works in logic, but what about ingame? Thing for me is I don't like to make things in lore too much more powerful than they are ingame. Admittedly, some things do need to be buffed due to the limitations of SP, but most of the time it's not too far off. Take a few examples, the B-0B being undetecable by radar, FT-3's insane turnrate, the AMX-10M shooting down and F-14, the A-52A dragging the USS Beast onto Wright, all feats that can be done ingame (albeit that last one took me a solid 40 minutes).
Speaking of, the B-0B is still (fairly) easily visible by the eye, and it's a bomber, not a fighter, so any well-trained pilot shouldn't in reality suffer too badly against it (although, in truth, armor and MDA strategy should still make the B-0B hard to shoot down, the "redeeming" factor is that it would be equally difficult to be shot down by the Tundra Terror).
@KPLBall
Nah we both chill. I'm chill because it's kinda karma, and she's chill because she doesn't have a father. Like, she wasn't biologically brought into the world.
Besides, it is true to a degree. AMX-10M was actually a real tank destroyer, but was cancelled, if I'm correct, mostly because of practicality issues.
@SPsidearm
1. Missiles, huh? Good thing I've got invisible planes when it comes to missiles lol
2. In that case I'ma just noscope him with all my tanks. Hefty is innocent, he's not even carrying military cargo right now. Anyone who wants to hurt Hefty deserves to be erased. Not even die. Just erased from existence. Destroy them and everyoen who ever looked up to him.
3. Since when did the RCE have F-35s??
@KPLBall Oh fair enough
Speaking of, almost all A-40B/C/C-R1s will be converted into A-40Ds, except for a few A-40s which will be kept for museum purposes.
And yeah A-14 really needs some friends
@SPsidearm I want to know who this mastermind is before an something happens My new recon plane has been tracking said Mastermind, I don't know who they are, but I have their coordinates ready at a moment's notice
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 Same here, I honestly think it wouldn't hurt to use all three aircraft (My two and Crestel's). FT-8 and FTA-24 actually have a bit of a tradeoff, with the former being smaller (harder to hit), lighter, more agile, and less expensive, whilst the latter is faster, better armed, and stealthier.
@CrestelAeronautics Honestly I say fourth, mostly because they're less expensive. Think of it; The F-22 is obviously a better fighter than the F-16, but the F-22 has limited numbers and high maintenance. Meanwhile the F-16 has high numbers and climbing.
@JSTQ
1. So, the missile can be manned or unmanned in terms of targeting, right?
2. The proximity fuse is a huge part of Seemeing's J2, but fight it against some other planes (not OP customs like the A-40 or T-3, a fellow replica like a Yak-9 or P-38). The J2M is surprisingly survivable, and can survive with its wings, engine, and tail surfaces ripped off in combat. I'm not even joking, it's happened dozens of times. Again, though, don't put it against an F-16 or somethin.
3. Here's the thing though: did you try out the B-0B? Its stealth isn't exactly conventional stealth, but rather direct radar interference. Unless the missile is absolutely broken, it shouldn't be, at least not automatically, able to detect the B-0B at all.
@LunarEclipseSP @STALIN83
LEGOs are awesome :D
Sets are quite fun (even if they kill wallets faster than an A-40C kills phones), but I've also made quite a few MOCs, several of which have translated into planes I've built ingame. Most recently would actually be the RvG P-30A (two months ago ;-;). Initially an attempt to build a tiny Bf-109, but I thought it didn't look Messerschmitt enough, and turned it into that instead lol
I personally enjoy Technic the most of LEGOs thanks to mechanization, although few if any of my MOCs remain intact, I've made a bunch of cool stuff with Technic, especially with motors. All of my original Technic sets are close to untouched in terms of being taken apart, though, including my first one from a while back: Whack.
MDA 5:
@ImperialIndustries
MDA 4:
@Marulk
@JABH
@Boeing727200F
MDA 3:
@Christiant2
@JaxHere
@Randomplayer
MDA 2:
@windshifter1
@Karroc9522
@KPLBall
MDA 1:
@TheMouse
@CrestelAeronautics
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26
@JSTQ Alright
@Graingy me neither honestly lol
I meant a literal war hammer though, like a hammer with the word war on it, just as a joke XD
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 @SPsidearm
To further build on FOXHOUND's statement, let's take a look at exactly how tough it is to kill an Enargite VII:
-It has three layers of inch-thick armor all around the tank. And it still has engines and treads strong enough to get it up to 100 mph.
-The Enargite VII took no complete losses during the M-War or TC-War.
-Several Enargite VIIs- not just one special E.VII, several standard ones- also survived multiple nukes to the face, one of which is still operational (as a matter of fact, said Enargite VII, "Fallout," participated in the Fight for Wright).
-To date, it has only had two losses, and even those are debatable since they were both to a literal demon (The Thermonuclear Psychopath), and they were revived shortly after by said evil force, only to be liberated by allies shortly after. So it has lost a single fight (we're counting the two losses as one fight since it was the same moment), but no complete hull losses in combat.
-The E.VII was one of the first, if not the first MGLA (now MDA) tank to defeat the Monarchii's IS-3, which still remained the least-destroyed Monarchii tank of the M-War.
-The Enargite was so good that it was almost considered as a replacement for the Shock. Only numbers and versatility kept the Shock alive, but that may not be the case today thanks to the M49A3-C upgrade.
And yet, all that power and status, and LunarEclipse can casually toss one into the air without breaking a sweat. She could probably defeat any tank, any day. Even the M49A3-C.
@SPsidearm Uhh too late for that
I didn't forget the 2,500 planes attacking Wright, in fact the article is already in the works. It's just that my sleepless schedule is catching up with me... every muscle in my body hurts...
@KPLBall That's true but only to a certain degree; LunarEclipse, alongside SamuelJamesCastor, owns ALL of Snowstone, not just the Ice Base is particular.
This is giving me deja-vu...
P l e n
@JSTQ No?
@SPsidearm
Yes
@Christiant2
@JaxHere
@windshifter1
@Karroc9522
@KPLBall
@TheMouse
@CrestelAeronautics
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26
@Marulk I cannot decide on my own...
+1But the council shall decide his fate.
You're getting closer to 40k...
For funsies can you make a war hammer when you do-
@SPsidearm
1. I highly doubt that :v There's been a lot of talk about missiles detecting invisible planes lately, but y'all underestimate the meaning of "invisible," yk.
2. Wait, 5400? For real? The A-13 (first gen attacker) has 1E+32 per panel...
3. I thought those guys were wiped out when they tried to steal my drones (keyword: tried. I'm still living on that mini airfield btw). Guess I'll have to try harder, no?
4. I hate to the reveal the truth, but I'm not into the modern hype honestly. My pilots typically rely on their bare eyes- maybe telescopes- to see targets. Radar jamming will not save him.
Wait. IS THIS REAL?!
@JSTQ Huh. I see.
Well, my issue is this: It works in logic, but what about ingame? Thing for me is I don't like to make things in lore too much more powerful than they are ingame. Admittedly, some things do need to be buffed due to the limitations of SP, but most of the time it's not too far off. Take a few examples, the B-0B being undetecable by radar, FT-3's insane turnrate, the AMX-10M shooting down and F-14, the A-52A dragging the USS Beast onto Wright, all feats that can be done ingame (albeit that last one took me a solid 40 minutes).
Speaking of, the B-0B is still (fairly) easily visible by the eye, and it's a bomber, not a fighter, so any well-trained pilot shouldn't in reality suffer too badly against it (although, in truth, armor and MDA strategy should still make the B-0B hard to shoot down, the "redeeming" factor is that it would be equally difficult to be shot down by the Tundra Terror).
@SPsidearm Ah ok
@KPLBall
Nah we both chill. I'm chill because it's kinda karma, and she's chill because she doesn't have a father. Like, she wasn't biologically brought into the world.
Besides, it is true to a degree. AMX-10M was actually a real tank destroyer, but was cancelled, if I'm correct, mostly because of practicality issues.
@SPsidearm
1. Missiles, huh? Good thing I've got invisible planes when it comes to missiles lol
2. In that case I'ma just noscope him with all my tanks. Hefty is innocent, he's not even carrying military cargo right now. Anyone who wants to hurt Hefty deserves to be erased. Not even die. Just erased from existence. Destroy them and everyoen who ever looked up to him.
3. Since when did the RCE have F-35s??
@SPsidearm Nice :D
@SPsidearm Huh.
What even happened to HICOM since the RCF collapsed?
@JSTQ But idk how to do standard stealth?
@JSTQ Actually I can handle "invisible" units as long as they don't have auto-aim or missile spam or smth. Everyone else? Idk.
@JSTQ Oh ok
But still, no super stealth?! :<
@Karroc9522 There's more
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 Aighty
I say the FT-8 and FTA-24 will respectively just be the MDA versions of the F-16 and F-15.
@KPLBall Oh fair enough
+1Speaking of, almost all A-40B/C/C-R1s will be converted into A-40Ds, except for a few A-40s which will be kept for museum purposes.
And yeah A-14 really needs some friends
@JSTQ
1. True...
2. Eh, proximity fuses aren't that bad, use what you have mate
3. So, no super stealth :<
@SPsidearm I want to know who this mastermind is before an something happens
+1My new recon plane has been tracking said Mastermind, I don't know who they are, but I have their coordinates ready at a moment's notice
@SPsidearm
F-33A
F-33B (Unfinished)
F-33C (A.k.a OVU-33)
F-33D (Unreleased)
F-33E (Unfinished)
F-33F
F-33J
F-33NP (Unfinished)
F-33S
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 Same here, I honestly think it wouldn't hurt to use all three aircraft (My two and Crestel's). FT-8 and FTA-24 actually have a bit of a tradeoff, with the former being smaller (harder to hit), lighter, more agile, and less expensive, whilst the latter is faster, better armed, and stealthier.
Nice build!
Also, I could be wrong, but the KC-10 just retired recently. RiP to a great plane :<
+2Finally, a new Hawker Hunter!
+1We don't have enough of these around here, great work!
TK-3, despite being a bomber, makes an excellent air defense fighter. All it lacks is guns...
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 Aighty
@Monarchii Yep, indeed it is
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 probably won’t make it VTOL (due to cost and me being a noob at VTOL tech), but thanks :D
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 Ended up making both of them, and I love them both. Read the Description though
@CrestelAeronautics Honestly I say fourth, mostly because they're less expensive. Think of it; The F-22 is obviously a better fighter than the F-16, but the F-22 has limited numbers and high maintenance. Meanwhile the F-16 has high numbers and climbing.
@TemporaryReplacement heheheheheheheheheheheheheheh
@JSTQ
1. So, the missile can be manned or unmanned in terms of targeting, right?
2. The proximity fuse is a huge part of Seemeing's J2, but fight it against some other planes (not OP customs like the A-40 or T-3, a fellow replica like a Yak-9 or P-38). The J2M is surprisingly survivable, and can survive with its wings, engine, and tail surfaces ripped off in combat. I'm not even joking, it's happened dozens of times. Again, though, don't put it against an F-16 or somethin.
3. Here's the thing though: did you try out the B-0B? Its stealth isn't exactly conventional stealth, but rather direct radar interference. Unless the missile is absolutely broken, it shouldn't be, at least not automatically, able to detect the B-0B at all.
@SPsidearm Sure why not
@LunarEclipseSP @STALIN83
+2LEGOs are awesome :D
Sets are quite fun (even if they kill wallets faster than an A-40C kills phones), but I've also made quite a few MOCs, several of which have translated into planes I've built ingame. Most recently would actually be the RvG P-30A (two months ago ;-;). Initially an attempt to build a tiny Bf-109, but I thought it didn't look Messerschmitt enough, and turned it into that instead lol
I personally enjoy Technic the most of LEGOs thanks to mechanization, although few if any of my MOCs remain intact, I've made a bunch of cool stuff with Technic, especially with motors. All of my original Technic sets are close to untouched in terms of being taken apart, though, including my first one from a while back: Whack.
YB-40 is a Bee-17 Gunsheep