The Mirage has an almost unstoppable lead, so more than likely the French fighter is what you'll be seeing this afternoon Pacific Time :D
If things stay as they are, Prime Soviet Bias releases next, likely tomorrow.
@Karroc9522 I will say though, I should've said it earlier (lol) but I absolutely love the cockpits of your planes! Very detailed, and I bet it'd be fun to fly in VR!
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 @TheMouse @LunarEclipseSP
Aight so here's the results so far:
1 for F-10A Tanto
4 for Mirage F1
2 for Prime Soviet Bias
1 PF-9A1 Cloaker
Do or don't worry though; No matter who is chosen, they'll post in the afternoon of the chosen date (likely tomorrow if all goes well), since morning-to-noon planes get very little love from my observations.
@Pan In the past? I made an AC-130 that was technically Part Efficient, but never made the list due to its part count, so that is TECHNICALLY a non-PEA replica, since it is Part Efficient, but not eligible for PEA. In the future? Probably never; PEA replicas are hard enough so image non-PEA replicas where everything has to be 100% accurate. That would be painful imo lol, major kudos to people who can do that kinda stuff like AntonWings
Ok so everyone said yes
I'm going make PSM warbirds now lol
As of yet, almost unsurprisingly, the J2M5 is the first one to achieve the PSM part. None have gotten the Mach 2 part.
@Rjenteissussy
Oh there's more The Anti-Submarine Submarine The Tank-Destroyer Destroyer The Radar Disrupting Radar The Anti-Car Car The Anti-Ship Ship The Anti-Infantry Infantry The Anti-Barricade Barricade The Bunker-Destroying Bunker
@Omoriboy Indeed it is lol
However it could really be AA ---> AAA or AAA ---> AAAA. Despite being called the "Anti-Aircraft Aircraft" (AAA), I'm entirely fine with it being called the "Anti-Aircraft Artillery Aircraft" (AAAA), but I think we can all agree the former is much catchier and just rolls off the tongue. A good name can make the difference between terrible and top-tier marketing! Other acceptable names for this aircraft are "chonky," "YF-23 in the 1940s," or "Big Platform Plane with a Big Gun Strapped to It"
Yo nice
16:8 tho? Somehow that's lower than the Sabre lol
I really need more modern fighters ngl, all my other modern fighters are either
-Out of service due to age; modern design, but built when I was less experienced
-In service, but rarely seen in real combat due to OP; take for example the F-11 Draconian or F-67 Extinctor series aircraft(s).
-Weak; e.g. Intimidator, its agility is quite good but its speed, armor, and armament often lead to it getting surpassed by just about everything on the battlefield, except maybe my RC plane (which could still take out an Intimidator in a kamikaze move lol)
Really my only "good" modern aircraft are Vector, F/A-32A Striker, Puddle Vixen, Super Hydra Mk.IV, Interdictor, FI-63, and upcoming F-34 lol. And I know what you're thinking, but the A-40 is an attack aircraft, and I'm not counting PEAs since they're replicas. And due to the nature of the Crestan Conflict, of course I'm not counting any 3rd gen or earlier aircraft. Memes and joke posts are excluded too, with the exception of Puddle Vixen which is actually an intriguing concept with at least two hints of genuine effort lol
I'm getting off track :v
The Falchion's issue isn't really armor, between needing to stay light enough to dogfight, and the threat of missiles, getting hit means death regardless. The F-33's plague if you ask me is simply agility, it either has to sacrifice turn rate for control and stability, or sacrifice control and stability for turn rate. Of course, this can't be happening on a fighter, which makes the F-33 a perfect example of wasted potential (oof) Perhaps this version changes that, though?
@SuperSuperTheSylph lol the Zero part was a joke, ZeroWithSlashedO will miss A6M a.k.a. Zero, but you just gave me a new idea for the Psychological Warfare challenge, hehe...
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 Aight then, I'll take your Tag there too :D
The Mirage has an almost unstoppable lead, so more than likely the French fighter is what you'll be seeing this afternoon Pacific Time :D
If things stay as they are, Prime Soviet Bias releases next, likely tomorrow.
SHINY'S BACK
Welcome back comrade, but there is no time for rest. The war continues! Onvard!
+3@overlord5453
:shruggieUnderraTed plane, nice To see iT geT your aTTenTion! :D
@Karroc9522 Yep lol
@Karroc9522 I will say though, I should've said it earlier (lol) but I absolutely love the cockpits of your planes! Very detailed, and I bet it'd be fun to fly in VR!
Schwalbe!
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 @TheMouse @LunarEclipseSP
Aight so here's the results so far:
1 for F-10A Tanto
4 for Mirage F1
2 for Prime Soviet Bias
1 PF-9A1 Cloaker
Do or don't worry though; No matter who is chosen, they'll post in the afternoon of the chosen date (likely tomorrow if all goes well), since morning-to-noon planes get very little love from my observations.
+1@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 Well, it’s finished, issue is thumbnails and desc
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 I'd love to, but it's not entirely finished yet ;-;
Tag List 4:
@LoganTheGameDev
@SuperSuperTheSylph
Taglist 3:
@GuardianAerospace
@IDK0
@DogedogebreadWithAnAK47
Tag List 2:
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26
@DatFiat126Fan19
Tag List 1:
@CrestelAeronautics
@TheMouse
@TheMouse Aight np
It's beautiful :D
T
It looks awesome
You finished a project?
If so T
Heck yeah!
T
@JSTQ True lol
+1@JSTQ Just got it, it's actually a lot better than the original :D Maneuverability is amazing, and I love the heads-up display!
+1Noice
+1T
@JSTQ Sadly ;-;
@Pan In the past? I made an AC-130 that was technically Part Efficient, but never made the list due to its part count, so that is TECHNICALLY a non-PEA replica, since it is Part Efficient, but not eligible for PEA. In the future? Probably never; PEA replicas are hard enough so image non-PEA replicas where everything has to be 100% accurate. That would be painful imo lol, major kudos to people who can do that kinda stuff like AntonWings
@dabestsock I absolutely could myself, the issue would be quality.
Nice
@Majakalona Tag list :v
+1@Karroc9522 lol Geneva Suggestion
Ok so everyone said yes
I'm going make PSM warbirds now lol
As of yet, almost unsurprisingly, the J2M5 is the first one to achieve the PSM part. None have gotten the Mach 2 part.
@CrestelAeronautics oof
@Rjenteissussy
+3Oh there's more
The Anti-Submarine Submarine
The Tank-Destroyer Destroyer
The Radar Disrupting Radar
The Anti-Car Car
The Anti-Ship Ship
The Anti-Infantry Infantry
The Anti-Barricade Barricade
The Bunker-Destroying Bunker
@Omoriboy Indeed it is lol
+1However it could really be AA ---> AAA or AAA ---> AAAA. Despite being called the "Anti-Aircraft Aircraft" (AAA), I'm entirely fine with it being called the "Anti-Aircraft Artillery Aircraft" (AAAA), but I think we can all agree the former is much catchier and just rolls off the tongue. A good name can make the difference between terrible and top-tier marketing! Other acceptable names for this aircraft are "chonky," "YF-23 in the 1940s," or "Big Platform Plane with a Big Gun Strapped to It"
THAT WINGSPAN
BRO'S BIGGER THAN A B-984
Yo nice
16:8 tho? Somehow that's lower than the Sabre lol
I really need more modern fighters ngl, all my other modern fighters are either
-Out of service due to age; modern design, but built when I was less experienced
-In service, but rarely seen in real combat due to OP; take for example the F-11 Draconian or F-67 Extinctor series aircraft(s).
-Weak; e.g. Intimidator, its agility is quite good but its speed, armor, and armament often lead to it getting surpassed by just about everything on the battlefield, except maybe my RC plane (which could still take out an Intimidator in a kamikaze move lol)
Really my only "good" modern aircraft are Vector, F/A-32A Striker, Puddle Vixen, Super Hydra Mk.IV, Interdictor, FI-63, and upcoming F-34 lol. And I know what you're thinking, but the A-40 is an attack aircraft, and I'm not counting PEAs since they're replicas. And due to the nature of the Crestan Conflict, of course I'm not counting any 3rd gen or earlier aircraft. Memes and joke posts are excluded too, with the exception of Puddle Vixen which is actually an intriguing concept with at least two hints of genuine effort lol
I'm getting off track :v
The Falchion's issue isn't really armor, between needing to stay light enough to dogfight, and the threat of missiles, getting hit means death regardless. The F-33's plague if you ask me is simply agility, it either has to sacrifice turn rate for control and stability, or sacrifice control and stability for turn rate. Of course, this can't be happening on a fighter, which makes the F-33 a perfect example of wasted potential (oof) Perhaps this version changes that, though?
@CrestelAeronautics P e r f e c t
@TheMouse Close, but I didn't have that in mind when I made this, I was just going straight up insane lol
Tag List 4:
@LoganTheGameDev
@SuperSuperTheSylph
Taglist 3:
@GuardianAerospace
@IDK0
@DogedogebreadWithAnAK47
Tag List 2:
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26
@DatFiat126Fan19
Tag List 1:
@CrestelAeronautics
@TheMouse
@TemporaryReplacement
Here before the 60 second mark
Yo nice
Noice, PEA finally has a designated Fulcrum 👍😎
+1@SuperSuperTheSylph lol the Zero part was a joke, ZeroWithSlashedO will miss A6M a.k.a. Zero, but you just gave me a new idea for the Psychological Warfare challenge, hehe...
+1T, looking great
Mmmm
+1France
I can't lie, the name goes pretty hard lol
+1@SuperSuperTheSylph
+1Yep, based off the P-39 lol
wdym tho lol (second one)
Sweet :D
+1