29.7k TWDDerSharkmarine Comments

  • War Challenge: The return of the evil (CLOSED) 2.4 years ago

    @Yourlocalhuman aight gimme like 2 days....

  • War Challenge: The return of the evil (CLOSED) 2.4 years ago

    Is it possible for me to do a retaliatory attack to the sinking of the Slava-ER

  • War Challenge: The return of the evil (CLOSED) 2.4 years ago

    I may have forgotten to mention this, but i have a ship uploaded for the challenge yesterday, i feel that might help Snowstone later on

  • War Challenge: The return of the evil (CLOSED) 2.4 years ago

    @Yourlocalhuman you know, aside from that, i would be expecting Snowstone to also have aerial cover, some sort of an air defense aircraft situation

  • War Challenge: The return of the evil (CLOSED) 2.4 years ago

    How many planes and ships am i up against?

  • War Challenge: The return of the evil (CLOSED) 2.4 years ago

    @Yourlocalhuman aye aye, understood, three with Air Superiority payload and three with Anti Ship payload

  • War Challenge: The return of the evil (CLOSED) 2.4 years ago

    About these operations, is it able to be countered?

  • War Challenge: The return of the evil (CLOSED) 2.4 years ago

    @Yourlocalhuman i have calm down jeez XD, i have life in real life

  • FW-190 mit db609 final teaser 2.4 years ago

    @Al3x321 there's a guide on SP Forums about that, should be about text formatting

  • War Challenge: The return of the evil (CLOSED) 2.4 years ago

    @Yourlocalhuman ah damn, unfortunate, well, thank you for the approval

  • War Challenge: The return of the evil (CLOSED) 2.4 years ago

    @BombsAway4613 i see, well i'll wait for the creator approval

  • War Challenge: The return of the evil (CLOSED) 2.4 years ago

    Say...., is this challenge still going by any chance? if it is...., i want to join Snowstone side of things

  • Ya J-119A 2.4 years ago

    What are you saying mate, that is great looking

  • The weird plane/car challenge [CLOSED] 2.5 years ago

    @FirstFish83828 perhaps, im quite busy irl

  • F.T.R.C. 185 strike aircraft 2.5 years ago

    It ducc :D
    I shall name it ducky the hard worker

  • ZE-10 First 2.5 years ago

    For someone who just joined SimplePlanes, this is worthy of massive recognition, you have a lot of potential

  • YF-3 2.5 years ago

    This looks very good, you have potential

  • Custom ww2 plane challenge 2.6 years ago

    "Delta Wings Are Only Allowed For Jets"

    Lawd, Lippisch would like to have some words with you
    .
    Regardless of that, interesting challenge, might enter

  • 10 parts challenge 2.6 years ago

    Done i guess

  • cair 2.6 years ago

    This is plenty good

  • Ford Sierra Cosworth S1 2.6 years ago

    Ah yes, how nice of you to reupload my plane with almost no changes, and you didn't even credit me
    .
    How dare

  • War Challenge: The return of the evil (CLOSED) 2.6 years ago

    H M M M
    .
    F A S C I N A T I N G

  • VL7-F1 2.6 years ago

    This have huge potential to be good

  • GC-27A-1 ???Flower 2.6 years ago

    I see many many potential

  • Hawk mk II 2.6 years ago

    Ivnoticed you were silver now, great job

  • The mixed challenge [closed] 2.6 years ago

    @FirstFish83828 i see

  • The mixed challenge [closed] 2.6 years ago

    Does Turboprop counts as mixed propulsion? Because turboprops (atleast in WW2) are made from normal jet engine, just with an extra stage to drive the propeller, technically making a plane powered by it jet and propeller powered

  • Hatsune Miku Leg 2.6 years ago

    (wheezes)

  • Me-132 2.6 years ago

    @Hahahahaahahshs the He-100is a sleek plane indeed, but i actually never thought of the idea to combine both, Bf-109 in particular have good wings, He-100 have the aerodynamics, its just brilliant idea, like actually

  • a mirage f1 ish thing 2.6 years ago

    I see a lot of potential

  • P-64 TBAK 2.6 years ago

    Very good looking, relatively well built

  • Me-132 2.6 years ago

    Ooh, this is a very interesting idea for an upgrade to Bf-109

  • P-52 thunderdash 2.6 years ago

    @CRMSN01ARROW there's really no continuity in the designs of the plane to the numbers, P-38 is a Twin Engine Twin Boom and P-39 is a Mid Mounted Single Engine

  • F-17.9 Angry Bee 2.6 years ago

    I see potential

  • TugFinn 2.6 years ago

    Not too bad, better than the average, have an upvote for your work, welcome to SP

  • P-31-A peachgun 2.6 years ago

    Ooh, this is very good

  • WAF-15 2.6 years ago

    More text than planes, but this does look decent

  • Douglas AC-47 Spooky 2.6 years ago

    S O O P K E B O Y E

  • The Twin-Prop Challenge IS OVER 2.6 years ago

    @FuzzyAircraftProductions well the only thing i can take from scrolling is the fact that you allow CRP, not wether CRP counts as single or twin engine, the only assumption i could make is CRP Counts as Single Engine

  • The Twin-Prop Challenge IS OVER 2.6 years ago

    So, does contra rotating propeller counts as twin prop or single prop?

  • FISH CHALLENGE 2.7 years ago

    Fbbish

  • Navy Challenge [CANCELLED] 2.7 years ago

    A little bit of an update, i managed to make the bow flare, however, i have vastly overestimated my capability and so instead, im gonna make something less impressive but still visually appealing

  • Navy Challenge [CANCELLED] 2.7 years ago

    So i decided to make a ship with the funi bow flare
    .
    Boi is my prediction on 3 hour max is gonna get blown away just trying to learn this bow flare technique, i require sleep for now

  • Navy Challenge [CANCELLED] 2.7 years ago

    Mmm, speaking of Snowstone, what is their Abreviation, we have KNS for Krakabloa and RWS for Wright

  • Navy Challenge [CANCELLED] 2.7 years ago

    @Aarav oh i just noticed indeed, also spare the titles for those who are more deserving, i am no one

  • Navy Challenge [CANCELLED] 2.7 years ago

    So...., i've heard that Snowstone is back mmm? if that's the case, i might just make a ship for them

  • Heschia Hes-10 B-1 2.7 years ago

    @WinsWings, im sorry to ping you, but this is a submission for your "25 Parts Challenge", now the plane has been originally made as a successor to your challenge, however somewhere along the line, perhaps when i made an unlisted for test flight purposes, that successor was lost and now instead of being a successor to your challenge, its a successor to the incomplete version of this aircraft, which did successor correctly, im sorry for the slight difficulty this may cause

  • Heschia Hes-10 B-1 2.7 years ago

    Credit to @EngineerOtaku for this note, thank you so much for making me this note
    .
    aircraft lacks some stability in roll response; slippery
    tendency to pitch up at speed
    Due to stability of design, trim is sensitive
    weapons fire inside diameter of propeller(?)
    .
    at 100m altitude
    Top speed measured at ~485km/hr TAS
    Roll rate measured at ~320deg/sec
    Turn rate (285-290km/hr) is around 11.85sec sustained
    Max G-force (480km/hr) instant ~12.8G, sustained ~4.4G
    AoA (~295km/hr) measured at 14.39deg
    .
    Time to climb (100-1000m) from ~470km/hr, 27.56sec - speed down to ~300km/hr, 20deg nose up attitude
    .
    at 1000m altitude
    Top speed measured at ~512km/hr TAS
    Roll rate measured at ~320deg/sec
    Turn rate (~300km/hr) is around 12.5sec sustained
    Max G-Force (~510km/hr) instant 12.8G, sustained ~4.3G
    AoA (~300km/hr) measured at 14.3deg
    .
    Time to climb (1000-3000m) from ~500km/hr, 70.55sec - speed down to ~250km/hr, 20deg nose up attitude
    .
    at 3000m altitude
    Top speed measured at ~576km/hr TAS
    Roll rate measured at ~338deg/sec
    Turn rate (~340km/hr) is around 14.55sec sustained
    Max G-Force (~510km/hr) instant 12.8G, sustained ~4.19G
    AoA (~300km/hr) measured at 14.38deg

  • HP.52 Hampden 2.7 years ago

    @quiet i do look forward to it, you have my support