Took that from the real thing. Implemented after a British engineering team was disbanded and the info was given to the US. It solved the problem of planes not being able to maneuver at super sonic speeds.
I draw my planes on graph paper, or else it looks a-symetric and terrible, which annoys me and makes me start over. Then there is a type of tracing paper that can be used to transfer to normal paper. @helilover03
I originally was going to design it to stipulations set by the USAF for what a replacement of the F-22 should encompass, but I ran into design problems. For example, The plane was too small to make it with a rudder tucked inside the plane for stability. @Carsong1017
This plane has an aspect ratio of 1.4, while the F-22 has one of 2.4. A lower aspect ratio helps with maneuverability.
This plane has a wing loading of 21.1lbs/square feet.
According to information found on a Lockheed Martin website, the fully loaded wing loading is 99lbs/Square inch!
Nah, it is not that long. It looks like the child of a FW-190 A and a FW-190 D. It is long but not TA-152 long(That is a characteristic of the FW-190 D), and the cockpit is closer to the front of the plane (Characteristic of the FW-190 A). @GhostHTX
You can make the fuselage block thinner, place what you want to look like the glass in a cockpit there, then make it thicker again to get a nudge like effect.
So could you just tell me what is new on your plane there? @JoddyFubuki788
I am on Mac and IPhone. (Mac App Store. I cannot even get fine tuner) @JoddyFubuki788
Thank you @RyneKuczy
What about it is beta version. (I cannot download it)
Thank you @AceOfSpade @JettStorm @Sgtk @Carsong1017
Should I do more replicas? Because I usually do not.
Why does it need the beta?
Thank you very much @Gabriel3855
Do you have anything you would like to see me build? @mblastr
I recommend you paint your aircraft.
Thank you very much @MrDoolittle
Glad you liked the plane. It has less detail than I usually put. Because I mostly build on Mac. But I have not built on it in 8 days. @mblastr
Took that from the real thing. Implemented after a British engineering team was disbanded and the info was given to the US. It solved the problem of planes not being able to maneuver at super sonic speeds.
@mblastr
Can't wait.
Slightly laggy on mobile, but it is fine.
Good plane.
You know what gave away it was fake? The name Wunderbarerjäger.
If you look at German vehicles of WWII, the mean things like Tank hunter, assault gun III, tank IV, etc.
I would recommend something like Luftjäger.
Thank you @helilover03 @1gman4evr
Thanks @rexinn
Thank you @Ihavenorealideawhatiamdoing
The reason it is less colorful is because I usually don't build on iPhone. I will work on it. @jamesPLANESii
Wow, this is massive.
Thank you @Botfinder
It is good. @helilover03
I haven't used tracing paper since I was six and have no idea where to find it. Un fortunately. @helilover03
He he! I can enter my F-51 night eagle! @Carsong1017
I draw my planes on graph paper, or else it looks a-symetric and terrible, which annoys me and makes me start over. Then there is a type of tracing paper that can be used to transfer to normal paper. @helilover03
I originally was going to design it to stipulations set by the USAF for what a replacement of the F-22 should encompass, but I ran into design problems. For example, The plane was too small to make it with a rudder tucked inside the plane for stability. @Carsong1017
I see you changed your profile picture. @helilover03
Thank you for supporting @helilover03 and @Carsong1017. I appreciate it.
Thank you very much @phanps @helilover03
Thank you very much @Ihavenorealideawhatiamdoing
This plane has an aspect ratio of 1.4, while the F-22 has one of 2.4. A lower aspect ratio helps with maneuverability.
This plane has a wing loading of 21.1lbs/square feet.
According to information found on a Lockheed Martin website, the fully loaded wing loading is 99lbs/Square inch!
They won't let me get a chance to build planes. @Awsomur
Oh ok. @helilover03
Since you are on Android, would you be able to make a 10 20 and 30 degree rolled part?
Like the 45 degree one on this axis?
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/PJmXtu/Oops-this-axis
@helilover03
Nah, it is not that long. It looks like the child of a FW-190 A and a FW-190 D. It is long but not TA-152 long(That is a characteristic of the FW-190 D), and the cockpit is closer to the front of the plane (Characteristic of the FW-190 A). @GhostHTX
Looks 95% FW-190
Thank you @Exofalt
Thanks. Do you like it better than yesterday's? @helilover03
My link did not go through and somehow got left off my post, so this is my fault. I left it vague. I was unable to clarify. @Oski
Ok. Thanks. @Oski
@Oski https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/PJmXtu/Oops-this-axis
I forgot to specify. @Oski
That is why I asked again. @Oski
And I said that is tilted on the wrong axis! @Oski
Thank you very much. I will decide what to make it. @Blackknife
Thank you very much @Oski
How do you change your profile pic.
Sorta like this one tilted at 45. @Oski
Can you tilt fuselage parts at 10 20 and 30 degrees? @Oski
You can make the fuselage block thinner, place what you want to look like the glass in a cockpit there, then make it thicker again to get a nudge like effect.