@EchoVehicle it's simple really... you load the plane, you get an error message about the mod. Hit the undo arrow, then the redo arrow, and it will load but without the mod. You'll see that the cockpit has no gauges then, but there are black placeholders... in the new SP version, you can easily put in some gauges yourself.
@AlexsandrSenaviev you're probably just not hitting anything, then :p the MG's are actually scaled-down cannon with explosive slugs, and "aircraft collisions" aren't switched off -you should be able to shoot enemies (or your own plane) down just fine...
@ollielebananiaCFSP :p no matter... guess we'll never agree. You're trying to build the best possible planes that can run on any device which is fine; I'm into building replicas as detailed as I can manage without crossing the red line of a "reasonable" part count -which in my opinion is somewhere between 2-3k parts, since upwards of 3k is where my phone and tablet show signs of lag. I'm well aware of the fact that there are many users out there with lower-spec devices, and I could get a lot more upvotes if I built stuff to suit their needs. But that would take the fun out of it for me, since I wouldn't be happy with the builds myself. So no, it's not a shame to exceed 2k parts after the last update.
@jamesPLANESii ah, OK... didn't know that. It's not going to stop me from using the beta though :p truth be told, the 190 wouldn't have looked nearly as polished without the Beta-tricks...
@jamesPLANESii is that so..? To test it on mobile, I simply opened it on my phone and it worked nicely. These beta planes should do just fine on PC and IOS -no idea about Android devices...
@PxVector Thanks. I know about the slight auto-roll, and I also know the two reasons for it. Didn't feel it needed correction though; the real 190 wasn't the kind of plane that would fly nice & straight if you let go of the stick -according to its pilots, flying these things for 1 hour (even without having to dogfight) was actually quite a workout.
s13p! s13p! Please make me a member -I'm in dire need of some free masons. You have no idea of the rates these guys usually charge just for small repairs on a bathroom wall; free masons would certainly help a lot :p
@soldier289 Nice to see I'm getting some help updating these old crates to the new standard... all the old builds are indeed obsolete now; much more has become possible. Good luck with it!
I'm getting a lot of random crashes in the sandbox -and by "a lot", I mean the game crashes literally every few minutes or so. This used to happen with the previous SP version as well, but it was workable -say once every 30-45 minutes. The new version though is impossible. No idea what causes it; all I get is the message you can find in the screenshot at the below link...
@Grob0s0VBRa Yep. Consequence of the rather strange "physics" of the game; a 5000 HP prop engine has zero torque, but a small rotator produces enough to throw a 5-ton plane around like it was nothing. Easily solved by just adding a rotator with an identical part connected to it, rotating in the opposite direction. Makes no sense either since the connected parts have zero mass, but OK... just one of SP's weirdo quirks I guess.
@MeuseFlugzeugbau that would be easy enough... just put some wheels on the damn thing, and presto. Don't think there ever was a land version of the 196 though, was there?
@Masonaviation please read the trailing comments... there's no need for a "non-mod version"; the way to download builds without the mods has been explained numerous times #RTFM
Quick question: not being Asian, I always fail to see the connection between cartoon schoolgirls and tanks/planes/battleships. Come to think of it, I fail to see the point of cartoon schoolgirls -period. Can anyone offer some insights..?
Other than that: cool build!
One year only? The communists always made 5-year plans… and then took 50 years to complete them. Well, the two or three that actually got completed, that is… 😂
@killingdeath yeah, well… send all complaints to the plane’s designer 😬 unfortunately Mr Junkers is no longer alive to take your call. Anyway, just click the link to the trimotor version and presto, two extra engines…
@Chaka Thanks a lot for the high praise! But I'll be happy if the upvotes trump my old He-111... reaching the magical limit of 100 seems to be quite difficult :D :D
@EchoVehicle it's simple really... you load the plane, you get an error message about the mod. Hit the undo arrow, then the redo arrow, and it will load but without the mod. You'll see that the cockpit has no gauges then, but there are black placeholders... in the new SP version, you can easily put in some gauges yourself.
+3@sam1333 sure you do! It's a very nice Fw-190 -and at only 1/5th of the parts I used on mine :p
+1@MeuseFlugzeugbau sorry, can't seem to reproduce the problem.
@Ldgovk4lvkf9vkko You mean an Anton..? Just click the link...
nice kübelhummer :p
@Ian_Yashima owww... my useless Macbook just turned green with envy!!
@AlexsandrSenaviev you're probably just not hitting anything, then :p the MG's are actually scaled-down cannon with explosive slugs, and "aircraft collisions" aren't switched off -you should be able to shoot enemies (or your own plane) down just fine...
+2@AlexsandrSenaviev AG3 has to be pressed
Strange. Just a pic of a plane… :D @parkrangerjerry
@Ian_Yashima Thanks! Hope it has a good graphics card... you'll need it :p
@ollielebananiaCFSP :p no matter... guess we'll never agree. You're trying to build the best possible planes that can run on any device which is fine; I'm into building replicas as detailed as I can manage without crossing the red line of a "reasonable" part count -which in my opinion is somewhere between 2-3k parts, since upwards of 3k is where my phone and tablet show signs of lag. I'm well aware of the fact that there are many users out there with lower-spec devices, and I could get a lot more upvotes if I built stuff to suit their needs. But that would take the fun out of it for me, since I wouldn't be happy with the builds myself. So no, it's not a shame to exceed 2k parts after the last update.
@jamesPLANESii ah, OK... didn't know that. It's not going to stop me from using the beta though :p truth be told, the 190 wouldn't have looked nearly as polished without the Beta-tricks...
@jamesPLANESii is that so..? To test it on mobile, I simply opened it on my phone and it worked nicely. These beta planes should do just fine on PC and IOS -no idea about Android devices...
@PxVector Thanks. I know about the slight auto-roll, and I also know the two reasons for it. Didn't feel it needed correction though; the real 190 wasn't the kind of plane that would fly nice & straight if you let go of the stick -according to its pilots, flying these things for 1 hour (even without having to dogfight) was actually quite a workout.
@JamezTV it runs smoothly on both my iPhone and iPad... plenty mobile friendly as far as I'm concerned :p
The very recognizable shape of the Sparviero is definitely there!! And yes, this is a tricky one to build... good luck!
+1Love this Italian stuff! Just waiting for someone to do a convincing "Sparviero"... :p
+1Love this Italian stuff! Just waiting for someone to do a convincing "Sparviero"... :p
Smooth & simple -I like it!
+1@Random04 nope...
+1@Artinmk I'm sure you didn't understand...
s13p! s13p! Please make me a member -I'm in dire need of some free masons. You have no idea of the rates these guys usually charge just for small repairs on a bathroom wall; free masons would certainly help a lot :p
+3@Pigeony haha... sorry 'bout that. No worries though; the plane itself is slow as well, so you won't get too many surprises...
I'll be gettin'out my gun. To make a mug shot :p how's that for a lame joke?
Thanks @Frossag for the 100th upvote on this one!
@soldier289 Nice to see I'm getting some help updating these old crates to the new standard... all the old builds are indeed obsolete now; much more has become possible. Good luck with it!
@JohnHorton Thanks!! I would like to get to 100 with at least one build... seems to be quite difficult :P
@TheDesignate It was actually more the Ju52's daddy :p
+1@Mrghostlol Argentinian Air Force ambulance plane
@WNP78 nope... just working on some plane in the designer. No labels with FT...
@Ryn176 Thanks for the tip... I'll try it
I'm getting a lot of random crashes in the sandbox -and by "a lot", I mean the game crashes literally every few minutes or so. This used to happen with the previous SP version as well, but it was workable -say once every 30-45 minutes. The new version though is impossible. No idea what causes it; all I get is the message you can find in the screenshot at the below link...
https://i.postimg.cc/Hk4fH4wF/unity-error.png
+2@Sergio666 Thank you very much!!
+1prevoskhodnyy!!
+3@Grob0s0VBRa Yep. Consequence of the rather strange "physics" of the game; a 5000 HP prop engine has zero torque, but a small rotator produces enough to throw a 5-ton plane around like it was nothing. Easily solved by just adding a rotator with an identical part connected to it, rotating in the opposite direction. Makes no sense either since the connected parts have zero mass, but OK... just one of SP's weirdo quirks I guess.
+3@MeuseFlugzeugbau don't sweat it... I guess I didn't read the part about fictional not being allowed, my bad. Made it for fun, anyway...
@MeuseFlugzeugbau so, here's an (unlisted) Arado 196L/Trop
Why not remove it and find out..? 😬@Grob0s0VBRa
@MeuseFlugzeugbau that would be easy enough... just put some wheels on the damn thing, and presto. Don't think there ever was a land version of the 196 though, was there?
@Masonaviation please read the trailing comments... there's no need for a "non-mod version"; the way to download builds without the mods has been explained numerous times #RTFM
@GuyFolk as Ennio Morricone would put it: <whistle whistle> wa wa wa...
+1Horten hears a who!
+1Quick question: not being Asian, I always fail to see the connection between cartoon schoolgirls and tanks/planes/battleships. Come to think of it, I fail to see the point of cartoon schoolgirls -period. Can anyone offer some insights..?
+4Other than that: cool build!
One year only? The communists always made 5-year plans… and then took 50 years to complete them. Well, the two or three that actually got completed, that is… 😂
+1@killingdeath yeah, well… send all complaints to the plane’s designer 😬 unfortunately Mr Junkers is no longer alive to take your call. Anyway, just click the link to the trimotor version and presto, two extra engines…
@Hedero :D :D true enough -although perhaps by 1930 standards it wasn't exceptionally slow for a cargo plane.
A puffer fish starfighter :D :D
+1Nice! I'm building a slightly less potent Junkers myself :D :D
+1Nice camo job... :D very inconspicuous indeed.
@Chaka Thanks a lot for the high praise! But I'll be happy if the upvotes trump my old He-111... reaching the magical limit of 100 seems to be quite difficult :D :D