Not bad but... you forgot the airbrakes !
Also you have put airbrakes for the landing gear hatches, and it reduces the speed a lot, I think you need to land at 400 or 500 kmh...
@AlbertanPlaneMaker Yep, so there are many aspects that you have misjudged. A build needs a lot of testing.
Or you can do your own plane, so it's not a replica.
@PapaKernels You're right x)
But instead of making grids with a lot of parts (I think), you could just put a black piece of fuselage, and improve other things with the parts you saved.
Excellent build ! At the beginning, startup procedures worried me, but actually it wasn't rocket science. Anyway I wanted myself to put realistic procedures on my King Air x)
The only issues are the maneuverability (not realistic) and the brake power.
But anyway I really appreciate the effort that went into this build !
Nice build, really like it !
The only bad points are the landing distance (you can edit the "Brake" xml value for the wheels) and the gear retract speed which is a bit too fast
But anyway it's fun to fly and realistic.
It looks nice, but the performances are not perfect... The maneuverability is too high, and the landing distance is very short.
But I really like how it looks and the colors choice.
Wow. I didn't expect that.
It's a very good build, the cokcpit is very nice (without voids in the panel), the exterior is very nice too. The physics are accurate.
To solve your problem of braking, maybe you can reduce the "Brake" in the xml settings of your wheels...
Anyway Nice job !
A nice build overall (an update in fact)
It is a bit too maneuverable, a bit too slow, but the performances are very close to the real ones, so it's nice.
The cockpit is full of informations, that's cool
Next time, try to make custom landing gears or custom wings with fuselage... and your builds will be better.
@C47skytrain Just kidding, Now make your own plane. I think you're able to make something of this quality...
+1The brake force is maybe a bit too strong, but it's a nice build overall ! Mobile-Friendly but realistic !
+1@hpgbproductions Ah, thanks for correcting, this things are quite confusing x)... I edited the previous message
+1Honestly, I thought it was a 7X
+1Nice ! I will work on this type of aircraft this summer, it's such a beautiful jet
+1Build a Cessna 152 or 172
+1Maybe the vertical stabilizer is too small ?
+1Not bad but... you forgot the airbrakes !
+1Also you have put airbrakes for the landing gear hatches, and it reduces the speed a lot, I think you need to land at 400 or 500 kmh...
Piaggio avanti my beloved
+1The fatest turboprop aircraft !
Looks like a GTA San Andreas mission
+1Why a see a logo light on the screenshot but not on the build ? And how did you made it you removed it ?
+1What impresses me is that you built this floats with the same complexity as the SP stock aircrafts !
+1We don't see much things on the thumbnail, but it's a cool build !
+1Good, but the handling is a bit hard
+1T
+1Nice, but some improvements are needed
+1Awesome build, I enjoy flying it
+1@asteroidbook345 There is a mod for it, Jundroo just have to add the system to the main game...
@AlbertanPlaneMaker idk, but if you do, I give you 2 upvotes :)
+1@AlbertanPlaneMaker Yep, so there are many aspects that you have misjudged. A build needs a lot of testing.
+1Or you can do your own plane, so it's not a replica.
Spend more time making airplanes. Your points don't match your level...
+1@MrOofington Not the best, for sure
+1Very good, the only issue is the landing distance which is quite short for an airliner...
+1Beautiful, stable, pleasant to fly, it's a very nice build !
+1Maybe you could reduce the brake torque, more realistic.
Very cool, but it's better to create a forum for this type of annoucements
+1T
+1SP-AAO
+1In second choice DDR-SKD
@PapaKernels You're right x)
+1But instead of making grids with a lot of parts (I think), you could just put a black piece of fuselage, and improve other things with the parts you saved.
@PapaKernels Sorry but Juanfly’s one is better
+1As a fan of the challenger, this one is quite weird lol
+1Wtf, the decadence of the Simpleplanes Forum
+1Excellent build ! At the beginning, startup procedures worried me, but actually it wasn't rocket science. Anyway I wanted myself to put realistic procedures on my King Air x)
+1The only issues are the maneuverability (not realistic) and the brake power.
But anyway I really appreciate the effort that went into this build !
Fun and powerful, nice build
+1I like this "old" SP engineering x)
+1Difficult controls, but nice build overall
+1No drifting ?
+1@PlanariaLab I confused it with the "Go" game I think
+1Just excellent. Nothing to say. Keep it up, please !
+1I lost a wheel in flight
+1Performance isn't perfect, but it's beautiful
Anyway for ~200 parts it's a nice build.
Nice build, really like it !
+1The only bad points are the landing distance (you can edit the "Brake" xml value for the wheels) and the gear retract speed which is a bit too fast
But anyway it's fun to fly and realistic.
@MAPA Oh okay. Good luck with your research
+1It looks nice, but the performances are not perfect... The maneuverability is too high, and the landing distance is very short.
+1But I really like how it looks and the colors choice.
Performance is a bit too exaggerated, but it looks very nice
+1Wow. I didn't expect that.
+1It's a very good build, the cokcpit is very nice (without voids in the panel), the exterior is very nice too. The physics are accurate.
To solve your problem of braking, maybe you can reduce the "Brake" in the xml settings of your wheels...
Anyway Nice job !
Piaggio vibes
+1Excellent ! I'm actually working on the interior of my King Air 350 and it will be the same level as yours :)
+1A nice build overall (an update in fact)
+1It is a bit too maneuverable, a bit too slow, but the performances are very close to the real ones, so it's nice.
The cockpit is full of informations, that's cool
Next time, try to make custom landing gears or custom wings with fuselage... and your builds will be better.
Excellent, keep it up
+1I like this design !
+1I just realized that ground vehicles physics in SP looks too "sliding", like it's a rainy road
+1Excellent
+1