It looks nice, but the performances are not perfect... The maneuverability is too high, and the landing distance is very short.
But I really like how it looks and the colors choice.
Wow. I didn't expect that.
It's a very good build, the cokcpit is very nice (without voids in the panel), the exterior is very nice too. The physics are accurate.
To solve your problem of braking, maybe you can reduce the "Brake" in the xml settings of your wheels...
Anyway Nice job !
A nice build overall (an update in fact)
It is a bit too maneuverable, a bit too slow, but the performances are very close to the real ones, so it's nice.
The cockpit is full of informations, that's cool
Next time, try to make custom landing gears or custom wings with fuselage... and your builds will be better.
Man, we've known for a long time that the ISS will be retired... at least, in service for the nasa and other space agencies, because maybe it will be recovered by a private company.
"Westland gazelle" ? This is not to highlight the original builder, Sud-aviation !
Also it looks like the nose is a bit too flat... but overall it looks nice
@Bryan5 I see... It requires some time but if you are precise it can be a good quality
Also idk if you know that you can make fuselages below 0.25, by pressing the value of the field you can do whatever you want with your keyboard
It looks nice, but the performances are not perfect... The maneuverability is too high, and the landing distance is very short.
+1But I really like how it looks and the colors choice.
Performance is a bit too exaggerated, but it looks very nice
+1Wow. I didn't expect that.
+1It's a very good build, the cokcpit is very nice (without voids in the panel), the exterior is very nice too. The physics are accurate.
To solve your problem of braking, maybe you can reduce the "Brake" in the xml settings of your wheels...
Anyway Nice job !
Piaggio vibes
+1Excellent ! I'm actually working on the interior of my King Air 350 and it will be the same level as yours :)
+1A nice build overall (an update in fact)
+1It is a bit too maneuverable, a bit too slow, but the performances are very close to the real ones, so it's nice.
The cockpit is full of informations, that's cool
Next time, try to make custom landing gears or custom wings with fuselage... and your builds will be better.
Excellent, keep it up
+1I like this design !
+1I just realized that ground vehicles physics in SP looks too "sliding", like it's a rainy road
+1Excellent
+1You could have pushed the reflections of the paint even further
+1Anyway, beautiful
Congrats, keep it up
+1Beautiful
+1T
+1@Bo1233 Thx
+1Français ? ça t'intéresse de rejoindre notre communauté francophone de SimplePlanes (on a un serveur Discord) ?
+1@Bo1233 I have learned flying RC airplanes with mode 1, yes...
+1@Lake Good job
+1Try to do custom wings or custom landing gears, and your builds will be better.
+1No
+1Yes. When I find a difficulty, I stop for several weeks or months... and it's hard to find the motivation.
+1Your builds designs are original, but unfortunately the success doesn't seem to be there...
+1Awesome.
+1Nice build, but the front gear steering can't go to 90°... like this it's difficult to turn on ground. Same thing on your CFM A320.
+1@AndiTontrando You're welcome
+1Man, we've known for a long time that the ISS will be retired... at least, in service for the nasa and other space agencies, because maybe it will be recovered by a private company.
+1Albatros X Avanti
+1I think you can do better with 160 parts
+1"Westland gazelle" ? This is not to highlight the original builder, Sud-aviation !
+1Also it looks like the nose is a bit too flat... but overall it looks nice
Nice build !
+1@BagelPlane Spektrum remains a good brand
+1@DieLoaf A 1:1 Replica of an Extra 300 should be vey nice
+1Your gliders are great now that it has a cockpit, keep it up !
+1Wow, nice job
+1Congrats
+1Yeah it happend to me on my Beechcraft. Very annoying.
+1Nice
+1I really like the paint scheme !
+1Nice concept
+1@PapaKernels ....Yes I know... but it's not exact
+1Before being swallowed by a jet engine...
+1@PapaKernels In a few days lol
+1@ReinMcDeer Yes but it will work only when there will be some pitch applied
+1Almost 2 years for me too
+1@Bryan5 Ok, it's really an advantage but... it will be difficult for you to finish a good quality build
+1A silver P-51 Mustang
+1@Bryan5 I see... It requires some time but if you are precise it can be a good quality
+1Also idk if you know that you can make fuselages below 0.25, by pressing the value of the field you can do whatever you want with your keyboard
@Bryan5 Why you find blueprints difficult ?
+1It reminds me War thunder
+1The landing gear is too narrow
Do you use blueprints ?
Do you use any blueprint ? it's much easier to build an airplane with. You will gain in quality.
+1