Enfin sorti !
Eh ben je peux te dire qu’il a l’air vraiment parfait... Je pense également qu’évidemment c’est ton meilleur avion à ce jour, en tout cas bon travail !
Je suis en accord avec @ollielebanania , tu met un barème qui n’a sûrement aucun sens, et qui n’est sûrement pas juste pour d’autres personnes... le fait que à soit en anglais mais également en français c’est pas logique non plus, quand à l’avion il y a pire mais bon....
@TheTyphoon I know EALC too, we don’t have "heavies" but we have a Dassault MD 312 (twin-engine aircraft) who still flying, and a Douglas A-26 Invader in renovation to be able to fly again, I am waiting for this for a long time ^^
@TechCreator Why would you add a link ? I don't understand, you can simply add informations (like... construction criteria, deadline, rating, rewards... the basics !!)... Inspire yourself with older challenges
The fact that you used ChatGPT is clearly blameworthy to me.
I mean, internet is plently of useful ressources that you can find with a simple browser search. Why would you use an artificial intelligence that want to simplify the answer, which makes it making errors and even lie...
@MobileFriendly I think this way don't work on 1.9 and 1.10 updates...
+1Sorry but when I see this... I don't see a 767...
+1Enfin sorti !
+1Eh ben je peux te dire qu’il a l’air vraiment parfait... Je pense également qu’évidemment c’est ton meilleur avion à ce jour, en tout cas bon travail !
Cool !
+1Every day I see several Piaggio avanti and I consider them as different planes...
@Eiro me too
+1@WarHawk95 Lol ouais j’avais rien à foutre alors je regarde les nouveaux build des gens
+1Nice job
+1Cool, it looks like a P-39 Airacobra
+1Je suis en accord avec @ollielebanania , tu met un barème qui n’a sûrement aucun sens, et qui n’est sûrement pas juste pour d’autres personnes... le fait que à soit en anglais mais également en français c’est pas logique non plus, quand à l’avion il y a pire mais bon....
+1Congrats
+1Nice build
+1Nice but... Not as good as Warhawk95 one's xD
+1it may not be very good to mod a rocket...
+1@ollielebanania Merci
+1Nice one
+1Noice but why do you Ping me lol
+1Idk What is it... but it looks cool
+1Cool !
+1It look nice !
+1@TheTyphoon Yeah lol, but he will surely not be able to fly before several months or even a few tens of months
+1@TheTyphoon I know EALC too, we don’t have "heavies" but we have a Dassault MD 312 (twin-engine aircraft) who still flying, and a Douglas A-26 Invader in renovation to be able to fly again, I am waiting for this for a long time ^^
+1Tiens j’aurai été tenté de faire un spotlight sur celui la x)
+1@fantastekgamer I think too...
+1And why are they from japan? it's favoritism!
Not very good, you could learn use fuselage shape...
+1Huge and crazy, nice
+1Nice job, good for a daily vehicle x)
+1Wow, nice job
+1Nice boat :)
+1Nice, I have a V1 too but with a detailed launch pad
+1@XAircraftManufacturer Lol
+1Funny helicopter !
+1maybe there are some things to improve to make it more realistic, but overall it's a Nice build.
+1@GameManiaTM Ah oui celui de Dark Vador bonne idée... Je le met dans mes idées de projets
+1@WarHawk95 je connais mais j’habite pas à coté ^ ^
+1@WarHawk95 Volontiers !
+1Maybe... That would be better to make your planes stable ?
I remember reading your first post. By the way I guess that you are french ?
P-40 Warhawk
@Graingy This is the variable for the rate of change of the Yaw axis of the vehicle
Why not keeping it for yourself ?
@Planemodder1911 (YawRate>x)|(YawRate<y)
x is a value > 0
y is a value < 0
@32 same
Testing or flying stream would be more interesting
@StockPlanesRemastered Same thought
@TechCreator Why would you add a link ? I don't understand, you can simply add informations (like... construction criteria, deadline, rating, rewards... the basics !!)... Inspire yourself with older challenges
Looks like there was no information about the contest... That's not fair for the participants !
@Astro12 Looks like a meme from the 2000s
SimplePlanes is a fun game
The fact that you used ChatGPT is clearly blameworthy to me.
I mean, internet is plently of useful ressources that you can find with a simple browser search. Why would you use an artificial intelligence that want to simplify the answer, which makes it making errors and even lie...
And add more details (depending of the vehicle, pipes, cables, antennas, intakes, exhaust grills, lights...)