@NFIGMT 2016, a ROC warship accidentally launched a Hsiung Feng III ASM and hit a fishing boat. Killing one sailors and injuries two.
So he is making a joke asking "can it hit a fishing boat?'
I know that joke is not all appropriate but that what he mean.
@ACEPILOT109 For example, the maximum G load of MiG-31 and MiG-25 is only 5G. Compare to Su-27 and F-15C's 9G. It trade maneuverability for high speed and missile carriage.
@ACEPILOT109 Interceptor is kind of like a tank destroyer. It doesn't has the heavy armor and rotating turret(except US TD)for front line combat but it has heavy cannon that can destroy most enemy. So a interceptor is not design for dogfight, it is designed to carry powerful long range air-to-air missile to destroy enemy aircraft from long distance.
@HeavyC22 that is the problem. A wheel will retain its original collisions box even through you scale its thickness down. Use very small wheel and increase the scale of the length instead.
0 weight only to the details part...but can I use 0.5 weight on some parts like the fuselage piece wrap around the wing? My plane is too heavy already...@mikoyanster
@TrislandianAlliance this is a 50-60s aircraft and surely need to be replace by now but the Chinese aviation industries has just started to be on the line in the recent decade so the design of the replacement for this is rather slow.
@mikoyanster Maybe I didn't express my question properly. What I mean is xml editing like 0 sec lock time, longer burning time and maneuverability, etc. Is using that kind of "super missiles" allowed??
@NFIGMT fine
@NFIGMT ok.
@NFIGMT 2016, a ROC warship accidentally launched a Hsiung Feng III ASM and hit a fishing boat. Killing one sailors and injuries two.
So he is making a joke asking "can it hit a fishing boat?'
I know that joke is not all appropriate but that what he mean.
@BubbleLukasie already mentioned to be tagged. I will just keep waiting !
啊這, 你把貼子刪了我沒法看你的回覆啊
T
Building...heavy fighter@Mitchel59
@hopotumon oh...
Bro is the challenge simple replica result out?
@Dastin Thanks for the advice.
@ACEPILOT109 No problem
nice !
But she not having the iconic R-33 heavy missile upset me : (
@ACEPILOT109 For example, the maximum G load of MiG-31 and MiG-25 is only 5G. Compare to Su-27 and F-15C's 9G. It trade maneuverability for high speed and missile carriage.
@ACEPILOT109 Interceptor is kind of like a tank destroyer. It doesn't has the heavy armor and rotating turret(except US TD)for front line combat but it has heavy cannon that can destroy most enemy. So a interceptor is not design for dogfight, it is designed to carry powerful long range air-to-air missile to destroy enemy aircraft from long distance.
"T"
BTW it is a interceptor not fighter
介紹有圖片FAIL咗
Thank you so much for reviewing our aircraft
*at least I didn't come last
@mikoyanster Thank you
You should state one more rule:
No 0 weight/0 drag/infinite fuel.
But...the flag is upright...
@TMach5 you are welcome
@HeavyC22 you are welcome
@HeavyC22 that is the problem. A wheel will retain its original collisions box even through you scale its thickness down. Use very small wheel and increase the scale of the length instead.
Do you use fine tuner to squeeze the wheel to very thin? If yes, that is the problem.
@HeavyC22 yes, but for curves, it is always 24 sides, 15°degree rotate between each panel
@HeavyC22 Also, I think you use too many panels for the door. The defaults circle in game has 24 sides. You don't need more than that.
@HeavyC22 I personally think double your existing carry capacity is more realistic.
@HeavyC22 No problem
The bomb bay is kind of a waste of space...you can stack much more bombe than that. Still a good build !
The deck is so large but you put in so little missiles...
大佬高產似那......(>x<)
@Ebf123 讓我看看能不能加一個哈(滑稽)
@ChallengerHellcat but...I am not an expert of building cars...
Try make the plane larger, take measurement and compare it to real life aircraft. That will make it look much better
@hopotumon thanks
Bro it is one and a half month in 2020. Any news about the simple replica fighter challenge?
@Eagle92Lightning Glad that you notice that
Sadly there are no airplane on this : (
This truck looks quite good in my eye.
T
Emm...a Bristish Electric Lightning with Boeing X-32 nose???
0 weight only to the details part...but can I use 0.5 weight on some parts like the fuselage piece wrap around the wing? My plane is too heavy already...@mikoyanster
@ChallengerHellcat 其實個懸掛好差, 越野果時成日整部車彈起, 又成日失控打轉(都系中文容易表達啲lol)
@ChallengerHellcat thank you !
@ChallengerHellcat 系啊,香港,千禧年人
@ChisP nope, look closely at the tail boom and try again !
@TrislandianAlliance this is a 50-60s aircraft and surely need to be replace by now but the Chinese aviation industries has just started to be on the line in the recent decade so the design of the replacement for this is rather slow.
@edensk can you expain a little bit more please? I am really a computer idiot...
@CoolPeach thank tou very much.
@mikoyanster Maybe I didn't express my question properly. What I mean is xml editing like 0 sec lock time, longer burning time and maneuverability, etc. Is using that kind of "super missiles" allowed??
Can I use a 0 drag part for building the landing gear?