Was in an AI race. I finished the race, flipped back, so I was facing the other way, locked onto my opponent and shot them down before they crossed the finish line.
@Mod To be honest, I was expecting little in terms of attention. It's a pretty specific thing and I would imagine some people on the site aren't old enough to know what it is. However, I'm pretty impressed with the upvote to download ratio: 6:1
XD
@PlanesOfOld I wouldn't word it like you did, but I've seen him/her say some unreasonable stuff. I don't think I've ever called him out for it though, but then I'm more the type of person who sits back and watches over things until they really do get out of hand.
I think people sometimes forget that toxic behaviour only breeds more toxic behaviour, which is clearly the case here. If the mods have already dealt with him multiple times, then that should be enough grounds to ban him/her from the site, like a three strikes and you're out type thing.
As a side note though. I did always wonder what happened to LordOfLego, he was one of my favourite builders on the site. And his disappearance seemed pretty sudden and out of the blue. If everything you say is true, it does seem a shame that other people are no longer posting/being active because of one person being toxic.
I have an inkling that this was inspired by later B-36 designs? The use of props and the four jet engines seems to suggest that anyway. It flies great. It's a bit slow when rolling, but it's a bomber, not a fighter, so it's expected. Pitch response is pretty good though!
From a comparison point of view, my SB-2 is probably the most comparable plane I have to this. It has a larger wingspan, but a shorter length. I went a little more overkill on the payload front though. Would be interesting to see them side by side!
@TheOwlAce I really just thought of this as the last stand aircraft. The bringer of some kind of apocalypse. If you've beaten a countries main defences and you want to take out the whole country, this would be the plane to achieve it. For example instead of using a small fleet of B-36's, you'd just use one or two of these to deliver devastating damage to a country. But, like an AC-130, you'd need a clear path in order to utilise it effectively.
@TheOwlAce Have both under two different variations. I've been busy making two variations of my old ES-21. One is just big and doesn't do a lot, the other is an armoured attack variant with props instead of jets.
I too have been busy with land vehicles. Unfortunately, success has been limited. I build the prototype and then the wheels bug out and destroy my vehicle. Hopefully, it'll all get fixed soon.
@NovaTopaz alternatively, you could have the option to disable the islands. Although, there would probably been too much programming involved for what it's worth. It's a thought though.
And because someone else does it, that makes it acceptable right? Herd mentality is the kind of thing that results in nationalism.
Also, there's a chance what you said was taken out of context. I'm assuming that what you quoted was a generalisation, rather than directed at a specific person. If it was directed at a specific person, then I question their morals.
@Glaceon it might well be a rule, but it doesn't entitle you to spread things like this. Also, speaking of breaking rules, arguably what you have posted can be regarded as spam. If someone has broken a rule, then refer them to the rules and if needed, ask a moderator to get involved.
Enforcing a rule involves making the user aware they have broken a rule, not telling them that "no one cares". May I remind you this is an online community where toxic behaviour should be kept to a minimum.
Should I need to take this situation further, I will request a Mod to look into the matter. However, I'd like to think we can both walk away from this both having learned something.
@TheLastDayLP No problem!! I don't change the aerofoil type in builds often, but more often than not, they're very handy for trimming out a plane so it flies level.
If you want to make it controllable for PC you need to move the CoM forward a bit more (add dead weight and fuel to some of the nose sections) and change the main wing surfaces to a flat bottom aerofoil. Basically, moving the weight/mass forward means it's more stable, however this caused a pitch down moment, so you counteract it with a flat bottom aerofoil that's forward of the red sphere (centre of mass) which generates more lift at the front in order to counter the added weight at the front. Sorry if you know this stuff already, but on the off chance you don't it might prove to be useful!
@SteadfastContracting If something is fast and not manoeuvrable just label it as an interceptor or a bomber! XD
And no problem. I try to aim for something that either flies level at top speed or with a slight climb. If it nose dives or tries to do constant back flips when it shouldn't even after tinkering, I'll either scrap it or redo the wings from scratch... Unless of course it's a high altitude plane, in which case it often has to have a large pitch up moment.
@SteadfastContracting Ah. Flies well though. For one reason or another most people's planes I download have bad handling as in they'll either dive like it's the Olympics when you take your hands of the controls, or try and turn into some kind of space craft (which is okay if that's the intention), your aircraft fly and handle very well though!
Depends on the type of flap used. Would be nice to see a few flap options to chose from instead of one generic one. That said, this is simpleplanes, not complexplanes XD
@PhilipTarpley Thank you very much!!! And also thanks for the upvote! Almost tempted to try and make another version. I've got a proper set of mechanical legs (they move both back and forth rather than just either forward or backward like on this). Unfortunately, I think I'll likely have to wait until I get a new proper gaming computer before I can do that (which could be a while)!
Put it up against my PAK FA in a dogfight at close range. Needless to say, this plane won. It kept up with it in turns like my PAK FA was some sort of deformed snail!
@SteadfastContracting Not going to lie, but this is probably one of the most manoeuvrable planes I've flown along the pitch axis. I was flying at 90 degrees to the water, pulled up with 200-400 feet to go and didn't even skim the water.
@KevinMurphy Thank you so much for the feature! Honestly never thought the day would come!
@SteadfastContracting I know right! I'll have to get round to taking a lott at your plane you uploaded today once I've got over the initial shock!
@CyberDyneIndustries Does that work? I'll upload it privately and paste the link somewhere here for you once I'm finished testing out SteadfastContracting's aircraft.
@Flightsonic That has legitimately happened to me before. I was pretty sure that I lost a few IQ watching it do what it did. Still. It must be hard for the Devs to make a program that's universal and works on all planes.
contemplates life and the universe, misses the ring all together, but tries to correct itself by trying to do a 90 degree turn in the space of 0.27 seconds, ring turns red, AI goes potato and decides to hug the nearest hillside
@SteadfastContracting That's always a good start. For some of my aircraft, I find it difficult to get them to manoeuvre well... Surprisingly though, the majority of my nicer looking planes handle quite well.
@SteadfastContracting Flies really well. Pitches up a bit more than I would like it to at full throttle, but that's more of a personal preference thing!
All the changes you made compliment the original design well too, so no criticisms there. Kind of reminds me of a cross between the F-35 and the F/A-18. Would be cool if you made something similar in the future with BFE120 engines though!!
Overall, I think you made the best out of what you were given!!
@Hyperloop Thanks for the upvote!!
Was in an AI race. I finished the race, flipped back, so I was facing the other way, locked onto my opponent and shot them down before they crossed the finish line.
@Hyperloop Thanks for the upvote!
@Mod To be honest, I was expecting little in terms of attention. It's a pretty specific thing and I would imagine some people on the site aren't old enough to know what it is. However, I'm pretty impressed with the upvote to download ratio: 6:1
XD
@Mod @General360 @ElGatoVolador @GrimMantis @amazingperson124
Thank you guys for the upvotes!
@PlanesOfOld I wouldn't word it like you did, but I've seen him/her say some unreasonable stuff. I don't think I've ever called him out for it though, but then I'm more the type of person who sits back and watches over things until they really do get out of hand.
I think people sometimes forget that toxic behaviour only breeds more toxic behaviour, which is clearly the case here. If the mods have already dealt with him multiple times, then that should be enough grounds to ban him/her from the site, like a three strikes and you're out type thing.
As a side note though. I did always wonder what happened to LordOfLego, he was one of my favourite builders on the site. And his disappearance seemed pretty sudden and out of the blue. If everything you say is true, it does seem a shame that other people are no longer posting/being active because of one person being toxic.
I have an inkling that this was inspired by later B-36 designs? The use of props and the four jet engines seems to suggest that anyway. It flies great. It's a bit slow when rolling, but it's a bomber, not a fighter, so it's expected. Pitch response is pretty good though!
From a comparison point of view, my SB-2 is probably the most comparable plane I have to this. It has a larger wingspan, but a shorter length. I went a little more overkill on the payload front though. Would be interesting to see them side by side!
@TheOwlAce I really just thought of this as the last stand aircraft. The bringer of some kind of apocalypse. If you've beaten a countries main defences and you want to take out the whole country, this would be the plane to achieve it. For example instead of using a small fleet of B-36's, you'd just use one or two of these to deliver devastating damage to a country. But, like an AC-130, you'd need a clear path in order to utilise it effectively.
@TheOwlAce Have both under two different variations. I've been busy making two variations of my old ES-21. One is just big and doesn't do a lot, the other is an armoured attack variant with props instead of jets.
I too have been busy with land vehicles. Unfortunately, success has been limited. I build the prototype and then the wheels bug out and destroy my vehicle. Hopefully, it'll all get fixed soon.
@NovaTopaz alternatively, you could have the option to disable the islands. Although, there would probably been too much programming involved for what it's worth. It's a thought though.
And because someone else does it, that makes it acceptable right? Herd mentality is the kind of thing that results in nationalism.
Also, there's a chance what you said was taken out of context. I'm assuming that what you quoted was a generalisation, rather than directed at a specific person. If it was directed at a specific person, then I question their morals.
@Glaceon it might well be a rule, but it doesn't entitle you to spread things like this. Also, speaking of breaking rules, arguably what you have posted can be regarded as spam. If someone has broken a rule, then refer them to the rules and if needed, ask a moderator to get involved.
Enforcing a rule involves making the user aware they have broken a rule, not telling them that "no one cares". May I remind you this is an online community where toxic behaviour should be kept to a minimum.
Should I need to take this situation further, I will request a Mod to look into the matter. However, I'd like to think we can both walk away from this both having learned something.
@Glaceon @Thefalloutplayr but you both cared enough to post those comments. So, let's keep the hate to a minimum guys.
@SUPERSAMROCK No problem
This aircraft is so sleek and handles nicely. I can tell a lot of hard work went into it!!
@Seeras @General360 @SUPERSAMROCK
Thanks for the upvotes!!
@TheLastDayLP No problem!! I don't change the aerofoil type in builds often, but more often than not, they're very handy for trimming out a plane so it flies level.
@Nickasaurus @NumNumz
Thanks for the upvotes!!
@Johndfg No problem! It's a good build.
Houston... where is he when you need him
If you want to make it controllable for PC you need to move the CoM forward a bit more (add dead weight and fuel to some of the nose sections) and change the main wing surfaces to a flat bottom aerofoil. Basically, moving the weight/mass forward means it's more stable, however this caused a pitch down moment, so you counteract it with a flat bottom aerofoil that's forward of the red sphere (centre of mass) which generates more lift at the front in order to counter the added weight at the front. Sorry if you know this stuff already, but on the off chance you don't it might prove to be useful!
@SteadfastContracting Thank you and thanks for the upvote!
@General360 Thank you and thanks for the upvote!
@SteadfastContracting If something is fast and not manoeuvrable just label it as an interceptor or a bomber! XD
And no problem. I try to aim for something that either flies level at top speed or with a slight climb. If it nose dives or tries to do constant back flips when it shouldn't even after tinkering, I'll either scrap it or redo the wings from scratch... Unless of course it's a high altitude plane, in which case it often has to have a large pitch up moment.
@SteadfastContracting No problem!
@SteadfastContracting Ah. Flies well though. For one reason or another most people's planes I download have bad handling as in they'll either dive like it's the Olympics when you take your hands of the controls, or try and turn into some kind of space craft (which is okay if that's the intention), your aircraft fly and handle very well though!
Why does it fly 3x faster backwards? #LogicPls
Depends on the type of flap used. Would be nice to see a few flap options to chose from instead of one generic one. That said, this is simpleplanes, not complexplanes XD
That's a pretty creative exhaust going on there. How long did that take to make?
@SteadfastContracting No I didn't... I dread to think what would happen to my poor PAK FA if I did XD
@CyberDyneIndustries Here it is
@PhilipTarpley Thank you very much!!! And also thanks for the upvote! Almost tempted to try and make another version. I've got a proper set of mechanical legs (they move both back and forth rather than just either forward or backward like on this). Unfortunately, I think I'll likely have to wait until I get a new proper gaming computer before I can do that (which could be a while)!
Put it up against my PAK FA in a dogfight at close range. Needless to say, this plane won. It kept up with it in turns like my PAK FA was some sort of deformed snail!
@SteadfastContracting Not going to lie, but this is probably one of the most manoeuvrable planes I've flown along the pitch axis. I was flying at 90 degrees to the water, pulled up with 200-400 feet to go and didn't even skim the water.
Well I never... #LifeGoalAchieved XD
@KevinMurphy Thank you so much for the feature! Honestly never thought the day would come!
@SteadfastContracting I know right! I'll have to get round to taking a lott at your plane you uploaded today once I've got over the initial shock!
@CyberDyneIndustries Does that work? I'll upload it privately and paste the link somewhere here for you once I'm finished testing out SteadfastContracting's aircraft.
@Flightsonic That has legitimately happened to me before. I was pretty sure that I lost a few IQ watching it do what it did. Still. It must be hard for the Devs to make a program that's universal and works on all planes.
@Flightsonic
"Go through the ring!"
contemplates life and the universe, misses the ring all together, but tries to correct itself by trying to do a 90 degree turn in the space of 0.27 seconds, ring turns red, AI goes potato and decides to hug the nearest hillside
@RailfanEthan Thank you for the upvote!
@Allstar Thank you for the upvote!
@SteadfastContracting That's always a good start. For some of my aircraft, I find it difficult to get them to manoeuvre well... Surprisingly though, the majority of my nicer looking planes handle quite well.
@General360 Thanks! and thank you for the upvote!
@SteadfastContracting Awesome!!! I look forward to trying it out!
@Johndfg Thank you again for the upvote!!
@ACMECo1940 Thanks for the upvote!
@SteadfastContracting Thanks for the upvote!!
@CommunityAccount As much as I think it would be fantastic to get this featured, I don't think it will. But thank you very much for the upvote!
@Johndfg Thanks for the upvote!
I made a cluster bomb once... Never really fitted it to anything though. Might try and implement it on something.
@SteadfastContracting Flies really well. Pitches up a bit more than I would like it to at full throttle, but that's more of a personal preference thing!
All the changes you made compliment the original design well too, so no criticisms there. Kind of reminds me of a cross between the F-35 and the F/A-18. Would be cool if you made something similar in the future with BFE120 engines though!!
Overall, I think you made the best out of what you were given!!
@Dynimerous Thank you for the upvote!