@ZwillingerLuftfox46 In my opinion, I do not believe that would even be able to function without the nose. Either the fuel is in the nose and the jets lose their fuel source, or the fuel is in the wings or tail section, and either way losing the nose would mean losing the bomb's weight, which would result in all the weight being at the tail, likely putting the CoM behind the CoL, and I think we all know what happens then.
@shipster all of them, i removed the launch tower and it had no affect on the part count. I assume this is because the launch tower isn't actually attached to the rocket.
@blueshirtandjeans thank you. And just keep trying. I went through many variations of this plane (as well as all my others) before posting them, and as my skills improve, I will often revisit older projects or take on new ones that I never thought i could accomplish. Even if you think you can't create one plane, don't give up on it. Just revisit it later on when you think you can.
@Irobert55 in what way? it seems to be one of their best (at least for when it was created) do to it having multiple parts that were more or less revolutionary for aircraft of the time, some of those things being that it was the first plane with a pressurized cabin as well as being one of the first to use some form of a computer/remote-control system for its turrets. Yes it had problems, but when working with all that technology that was new at the time you can't really blame it for those problems. However, I respect your opinion that it was an unsuccessful and/or poorly made aircraft and hope not to start an argument.
@Kazin i didnt make this. the only things i added were the gyro and the minigun, as well as a few minor tweaks that aren't easily noticed but help it fly a bit better. I have tried before at making my own, but they never turn out well. I would suggest requesting a Fallout 4 Vertibird from some more skilled/detailed builders, I usually work on the more simplistic side.
@JetFly the Hydra in GTA V is based on the Harrier. Other than the name, they are the same plane. I'm pretty sure the only reason they have different names is for some wierd copyright reason.
@hopotumon I understand part of what you're saying, but could you clarify this: "...reduce the wide of pitch survace so you can get the agility". Also, thanks for the feedback. I often try to ask for other's opinions when posting my creations, and if i ever get enough suggestions i will try to post a new variant of the craft. Overall, thanks for the help!
@ShockRF Thank you. really though, im not sure how this MIG managed to be so popular (In comparissan with my other planes, that is). but im glad it did some good posting it. if i didnt have so many other planes that i have saved and are ready to post then perhaps more great ones like this could come out. also, side note, A-10 Thunderbolt II coming soon!
@hobbitfrog go ahead!
I ended up having to submit my entry as a successor to a successor to this, that won't disqualify it will it?
@ZwillingerLuftfox46 In my opinion, I do not believe that would even be able to function without the nose. Either the fuel is in the nose and the jets lose their fuel source, or the fuel is in the wings or tail section, and either way losing the nose would mean losing the bomb's weight, which would result in all the weight being at the tail, likely putting the CoM behind the CoL, and I think we all know what happens then.
@Othawne Update: Done and uploaded.
@Othawne Challenge accepted.
Would the Westland-Hill Pterodactyl Mk V be okay? Since it's tailless I didn't know if it would count as a biplane.
@shipster all of them, i removed the launch tower and it had no affect on the part count. I assume this is because the launch tower isn't actually attached to the rocket.
@BMilan no problem, I would credit you regardless
@BMilan may I still post my variations of them?
May I have permission to take the heli(s) and the plane in this, turn them into functioning aircraft, and post them?
Is it ok if I upload an edited version of this? Also great job!
Hello
@blueshirtandjeans thank you. And just keep trying. I went through many variations of this plane (as well as all my others) before posting them, and as my skills improve, I will often revisit older projects or take on new ones that I never thought i could accomplish. Even if you think you can't create one plane, don't give up on it. Just revisit it later on when you think you can.
@ACMECo1940 thanks!
@ACMECo1940 thank you!
@Blue0Bull thank you very much!
@Irobert55 in what way? it seems to be one of their best (at least for when it was created) do to it having multiple parts that were more or less revolutionary for aircraft of the time, some of those things being that it was the first plane with a pressurized cabin as well as being one of the first to use some form of a computer/remote-control system for its turrets. Yes it had problems, but when working with all that technology that was new at the time you can't really blame it for those problems. However, I respect your opinion that it was an unsuccessful and/or poorly made aircraft and hope not to start an argument.
@Kazin np
@Kazin i didnt make this. the only things i added were the gyro and the minigun, as well as a few minor tweaks that aren't easily noticed but help it fly a bit better. I have tried before at making my own, but they never turn out well. I would suggest requesting a Fallout 4 Vertibird from some more skilled/detailed builders, I usually work on the more simplistic side.
@shipster okay, thanks!
@shipster that would be great! if you have anything that could work with any of my other planes that would be awesome too!
@fishheads88 Thanks!
@JetFly the Hydra in GTA V is based on the Harrier. Other than the name, they are the same plane. I'm pretty sure the only reason they have different names is for some wierd copyright reason.
@Jacobdaniel I don't know. I have another Star Wars ship that I'm working on, but I'm not sure when I will finish it.
@blueshirtandjeans thanks for the suggestion! I'll consider making one in the future!
@blueshirtandjeans okay, that works. Just make sure to give credit!
@blueshirtandjeans in what way? but for the most part, as long as you give credit, yes
@Baldeagle086 thank you!
@Thomasj041 unfortunately I did not create the original, and I am not skilled enough currently to try and turn it into the dropship.
@helilover03 thank you! You are so kind!
@helilover03 thank you very much. This one in particular challenged me due to the placement of the guns, but I think I managed it
@helilover03 thank you! Honestly I think it's cause I make most of my stuff on my phone, which often seems to be seen as non-quality content by some.
@hopotumon I understand part of what you're saying, but could you clarify this: "...reduce the wide of pitch survace so you can get the agility". Also, thanks for the feedback. I often try to ask for other's opinions when posting my creations, and if i ever get enough suggestions i will try to post a new variant of the craft. Overall, thanks for the help!
Very nice job, this plane is amazing.
@jollyJoey thank you!
Could use a little work, but otherwise, great job.
@SlowJet ah
@SlowJet one what?
@ShockRF ok, good to know
@ShockRF thanks for the upvote. And make sure to credit me for a the base design of your MiG-17 (unless I misunderstood what you meant)
@ShockRF Thank you. really though, im not sure how this MIG managed to be so popular (In comparissan with my other planes, that is). but im glad it did some good posting it. if i didnt have so many other planes that i have saved and are ready to post then perhaps more great ones like this could come out. also, side note, A-10 Thunderbolt II coming soon!
@MrTyTheGreat thank you.
@Flash0of0green thank you
@MrTyTheGreat somewhat, yes
@Seonor thank you