@vidzforlyf
The technology in this video is amazing!
" could you make an all-aspect version? where the range is shorter at the front but still able to track at the front?"
↑It's possible, but I'm busy right now😭😭😭
@Aviator01 I don't know what the situation is, so I don't know what the problem is, but you may want to try to reconnect the parts, review the FT and then invert the controls.
Part collision should be disabled.
I'm not a good English speaker, but I think a lot of people are complaining about the number of parts....
But the number of parts is evidence of functionality and attention to detail, not a reason to complain.
If you have a problem with this aircraft, you should build your own low-part aircraft.
@Yourlocalhuman Possible.
There are probably two ways to do it: with missiles or with rotators and FT.
The former is easier, but it often requires OceanMod.
Fooooooooooooooooooooooo↑
I must complete the aircraft I am currently building at all costs.
+1@WaterFlavouredSpitfires Wonderful!!!
+1Are you still using your antique iPad? You seem to be a great thrifter.
@IceCraftGaming Funky Trees🌚
We plan to publish an explanation of how the missile works when the aircraft is released to the public.
+4T14
😭😭😭😭😭😭😭
+1@JuanNotAnAlt roast_ham9146
+1@vidzforlyf
The technology in this video is amazing!
" could you make an all-aspect version? where the range is shorter at the front but still able to track at the front?"
+3↑It's possible, but I'm busy right now😭😭😭
@Robomo119DerMustangKiller With AG on and AIM-9 selected, approach the target from behind and keep the target in the center of the screen.
The missile will then be activated.
+1@Robomo119DerMustangKiller
Open the internal missile XML and replace the part marked Activate2 with Activate3 or Activate5.
@Dracul0Anderson
Circles were drawn with labels and the location of the Target was obtained with Link.
url
@KmsErikaMaid The color of the label parts is changed internally, so the color code must be rewritten(DeepL)
@TimsonAviation Thanks for the report!!
@Mahfuzul2009 Maybe1000
@LunarEclipseSP Sorry😭😭😭
+1@Neruneten21 of course.
5parts Flare pod
pls use it.
@Rebelleader27 1000Parts....
+3I think it will be completed within a month of the quirk.
Like War○hunder
@FreakDust2004 Pls use PC.
@Vandermone No, I know this is the case with the F35B.
+2When I said "without TVC" I meant within SimplePlanes.
Sorry.
coming s∞∞n
Creating cockpit now😢
@Ummmhelli I built a low-part model.
@LAMBSAUCE @Ihavesnowball @CanadianAircraftBuilder @MrCOPTY @KangBaksoSoeharto @Lake
Aircraft was completed!!
Here is the link
Enjoy!
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/5LTH50/F-128-Sugaru
@S1lly @CaptainSquadronLeaderX @SimpleDynamincs @weeeeeeeeeeeeeeee @S1lly @combatwombat363 @Tntboi1
Thank you for waiting.
Here is the link
Enjoy!
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/5LTH50/F-128-Sugaru
Finally completed!
Here is the link
Enjoy!
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/5LTH50/F-128-Sugaru
This fighter is almost complete.
I will post it within the next few days, so stay tuned!!
@TRD Here.
+4https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/gCBz42/Para-chan-System-IV
国↑交↓
@Weaverfish I am sorry, but I don't know myself, as the only technology in this aircraft that is automatic sighting is not mine but his.
https://www.simpleplanes.com/u/PlanariaLab
+2@Aviator01 Not impossible, but I'm busy at the moment, so it could take some time.
+2@Aviator01 I don't know what the situation is, so I don't know what the problem is, but you may want to try to reconnect the parts, review the FT and then invert the controls.
+2Part collision should be disabled.
I'm not a good English speaker, but I think a lot of people are complaining about the number of parts....
But the number of parts is evidence of functionality and attention to detail, not a reason to complain.
If you have a problem with this aircraft, you should build your own low-part aircraft.
A model with 750 parts is available.
Mobile players may also want to try this one.
OKOK...
Make a mobile-friendly version without the cockpit.
However, it will have less functionality....
@MetalShaezodoonic Yes!!
But this is not real.
This is an original idea of mine.
@7 Ok👍
@7 Regarding VR?
+1Can you please elaborate on what the issues are?
@Yourlocalhuman Possible.
+1There are probably two ways to do it: with missiles or with rotators and FT.
The former is easier, but it often requires OceanMod.
@S3Viking
Please read this page and then use the "clamp" function.
https://snowflake0s.github.io/funkyguide/#numbvar
+1@Dracul0Anderson
+1I will make a aircraft for an explanation about it in the not too distant future.
@JustWingIt
+1I have added an explanation for this.
Please read, and enjoy!
@JustWingIt
+3Unfortunately, that is not possible in our system.
@S3Viking
+1Sorry I'm late
Pls look this.
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/848PIf/Camera-operated-Turret-Basic
@Tang0five
As you say,Ocean mod is indeed required: .....
But submarines, by their very nature, are almost impossible to enjoy without mod.....
@Nerfaddict Yes, I think you're right.
And I'm glad you took such a deep look into it.
Thank you very much.
@Nerfaddict sorry I don't really think about survivability...
+1However, it is hovering,very fast, and small, so it is hard to be damaged.
やりますねぇ！@IWasa
+1(首)
@OVERTHINKR https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/907451041329586186/936050370583621653/IMG20220127090944.jpg
+2https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/907451041329586186/936050351268827226/IMG20220127090922.jpg