You said this could handle kamikazes easily, but what if the aircraft kamikaze-ing was a B-1B Lancer with all 70 bombs flying at 700km/h with a pilot motivated enough to want to send the Actias into the ground (cough cough definitely not me)
@Legomaster0418 set the "Maximum horizontal size of image in pixels" to 60 and "Size of each pixel in font units" to 0.5; or else the label won't appear in the game.
And to make your logo not be constrained in a white square, set the colour code for white (#FFFFFF) to transparent
@Legomaster0418 Are you making Continental Airlines Flight 603? If so try to make people be able to recreate the accident, that's what I did with all my accident posts lol
Also note that the real plane's a DC-10-10, which has no center landing gear (I know, it's annoying, but just take out the center landing gear and problem solved!)
Finally, T
@LEEEEEX
- Originality: 9/10 (never heard of this plane, and this is the only XP-68 on the site. The only thing's stopping me is the other XP-54 which was submitted, it may be a coincidence but it still reduces originality)
- Looks: 12/15 (looks good and accurate)
- Performance: 10/15 (pitched up a lot on takeoff. I solved this by adding weight to the front of the plane, and I could then shoot down B-17s with it.)
- Features: 5/5 (gun)
- Overall: 36/45 (sorry I'm late, I was busy posting this, making a post for reaching gold, and building a United Airlines DC-10)
🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿
also @Mastereldo you have only 445 more points to gold, keep it up!
First ever challenge: 46 upvotes, 13 spotlights, 6 submissions, and it's only been 3 days
This has surpassed my expectations to a level I could never have predicted. Thanks for all the support!
@qazedcujmyhn
- Originality: 8/10 (rare design, but there are already a few on SP)
- Looks: 9/15 (it looks good, but the plane looks more like a Boeing 767 than a Boeing 727, which the 7J7 looks more like.)
- Performance: 15/15 (everything works like it should, flight is stable too)
- Features: 5/5 (since it has the propfans)
- Overall: 37/45 (it's a really good airliner, it's just that it's not accurate enough)
@CR929thenewSPplayer
- Originality: 10/10 (plane's very rarely talked about, plus this seems to be the only HS.141 on SimplePlanes)
- Looks: 14/15 (looks exactly like the real one, I really like it!)
- Performance: 11/15 (pitches up a lot when flying, although I figured out that I can fly straight when I turn on the VTOL engines)
- Features: 5/5 (you successfully added in the main feature of the HS.141, VTOL)
- Overall: 40/45 (excellent job, I've saved the aircraft for use in future, if I could upvote this, I would)
@Mastereldo the plane’s made by a real-life manufacturer (Sukhoi), has blueprints and was really close to being produced, so yes you can build it
(also since Hololivefan2009 pulled out you can continue the idea and make the T-4MS a reality here)
@FirstFish83828 like I said below, the “video” was never released because the guy that snuck into Area 51 and supposedly saw the plane wanted to “protect national interest”. The photo’s a rendering by an artist who supposedly saw the plane with his own eyes.
Right now, there is quite a bit of evidence that something like the Aurora existed, from the sightings to the hearing of detached sonic booms that could be caused by pulse detonator engines to 3 billion dollars set aside for an undisclosed project, while the US government continues to deny this plane ever existed and that “Aurora” was a code name for the B-2 Spirit.
As a person who likes (plane related) conspiracies, I believe that the Aurora may have existed at some point, but I also accept that it may not. The information we’ve been given is sketchy and we’ll probably either only find out the truth in 50 years’ time when the US declassifies this plane, or never find it out at all.
@FirstFish83828 I do admit that the only “design” of the aircraft is a rendering made by an artist that supposedly saw the plane, and no manufacturer has been confirmed for this aircraft (even though Lockheed is the most likely)
@FirstFish83828 that is disputed, like the entire question on whether the Aurora was actually a real plane. The US government denies it but of course it could also be them covering up a top-secret project
Meanwhile there are people who swear they’ve seen it with their own eyes; one even said he took a video but didn’t want to release it to “protect the security of the US”
But yeah after what you said I’m now not sure if I should consider this fictional or not, as this project lies in a grey area.
@Mastereldo I’m leaving this approved for now, but I won’t be grading it yet. In the meantime try to build another plane that isn’t controversial. I’m really sorry :(
You said this could handle kamikazes easily, but what if the aircraft kamikaze-ing was a B-1B Lancer with all 70 bombs flying at 700km/h with a pilot motivated enough to want to send the Actias into the ground (cough cough definitely not me)
+1@Legomaster0418 set the "Maximum horizontal size of image in pixels" to 60 and "Size of each pixel in font units" to 0.5; or else the label won't appear in the game.
+1And to make your logo not be constrained in a white square, set the colour code for white (#FFFFFF) to transparent
@FirstFish83828 and preferably use Discord to host the images
+1@Legomaster0418 About the decals, you can click on this link. It will help you convert any images of logos into a text label.
+1@Legomaster0418 Are you making Continental Airlines Flight 603? If so try to make people be able to recreate the accident, that's what I did with all my accident posts lol
Also note that the real plane's a DC-10-10, which has no center landing gear (I know, it's annoying, but just take out the center landing gear and problem solved!)
+1Finally, T
@LEEEEEX
+1- Originality:
9/10(never heard of this plane, and this is the only XP-68 on the site. The only thing's stopping me is the other XP-54 which was submitted, it may be a coincidence but it still reduces originality)- Looks:
12/15(looks good and accurate)- Performance:
10/15(pitched up a lot on takeoff. I solved this by adding weight to the front of the plane, and I could then shoot down B-17s with it.)- Features:
5/5(gun)- Overall:
36/45(sorry I'm late, I was busy posting this, making a post for reaching gold, and building a United Airlines DC-10)Approved
I'll take a look at it
+1doesn't look like a fortress to me; it's more like a coffin with 4 engines
+1When most upvoted plane is a tutel
+1@SILVERPANZER to be precise, “Amusement Park 6 Millions™️” (I saw the name)
+1Hi and welcome to SP!
+1I’ll be posting a livery tutorial sometime next week, which may help you @NewToTheSPCommunity
FINALLY, A FUSELAGE WING TUTORIAL
+1Correction: 415 (because i upvoted both moais)
+1🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿
+1also @Mastereldo you have only 445 more points to gold, keep it up!
Nice, I’m working on the United Airlines version of this plane
+1Also T
@AirJMC nice
+1tbh i don't really play TFS anymore, my friend does though
@CooperFilms001 isn't that just a Boeing 707 with a t-tail? lol
+1@CooperFilms001 the -400 didn't have 4 wings, they just changed the engines to propfans (although now that you mention it, a 727 quadjet sounds good)
+1@MOSAstroBoy that would be political
+1Approved
another person posted a very similar plane (the XP-54) 2 days ago
+1Salmon sushi is my favourite
+1Big Brother is watching you!
Also T
+1æ on the tail
+1Rip 🪦
+1@TheSonOfThunder thank you so much!
+1@TheSonOfThunder even though not many planes were produced, it still got beyond the prototype stage, so it can’t qualify, sorry
+1That’s one huge nose
+1First ever challenge: 46 upvotes, 13 spotlights, 6 submissions, and it's only been 3 days
+1This has surpassed my expectations to a level I could never have predicted. Thanks for all the support!
@qazedcujmyhn
+1- Originality:
8/10(rare design, but there are already a few on SP)- Looks:
9/15(it looks good, but the plane looks more like a Boeing 767 than a Boeing 727, which the 7J7 looks more like.)- Performance:
15/15(everything works like it should, flight is stable too)- Features:
5/5(since it has the propfans)- Overall:
37/45(it's a really good airliner, it's just that it's not accurate enough)@CR929thenewSPplayer
+1- Originality:
10/10(plane's very rarely talked about, plus this seems to be the only HS.141 on SimplePlanes)- Looks:
14/15(looks exactly like the real one, I really like it!)- Performance:
11/15(pitches up a lot when flying, although I figured out that I can fly straight when I turn on the VTOL engines)- Features:
5/5(you successfully added in the main feature of the HS.141, VTOL)- Overall:
40/45(excellent job, I've saved the aircraft for use in future, if I could upvote this, I would)When FedEx is FedUp with you
+1@HololiveFan2009 it’s 226 upvotes now
+1(my bad)
@Jackflysplane001 the manufacturer operates its own cargo airline i think
+1@FirstFish83828 i'm afraid that's classified
+1@FirstFish83828 bye
+1Classified photograph of the crash of one of the 2 SR-91-A1 prototypes, RAF Boscombe Down, Wiltshire 26 September 1994
+1@Mastereldo one comment on the plane: the fuselage looks much better when I use fuselage smoothing
+1@Bryan5 wait there are variants???
+1(to any mods) is this considered a political debate? If it is I’m sorry
+1Approved
but i guarantee this will not get many points, I’m really sorry
+1It’d be great if the thing was actually an eagle
+1@FirstFish83828 lol
+1@Mastereldo the plane’s made by a real-life manufacturer (Sukhoi), has blueprints and was really close to being produced, so yes you can build it
+1(also since Hololivefan2009 pulled out you can continue the idea and make the T-4MS a reality here)
@FirstFish83828 like I said below, the “video” was never released because the guy that snuck into Area 51 and supposedly saw the plane wanted to “protect national interest”. The photo’s a rendering by an artist who supposedly saw the plane with his own eyes.
+1Right now, there is quite a bit of evidence that something like the Aurora existed, from the sightings to the hearing of detached sonic booms that could be caused by pulse detonator engines to 3 billion dollars set aside for an undisclosed project, while the US government continues to deny this plane ever existed and that “Aurora” was a code name for the B-2 Spirit.
As a person who likes (plane related) conspiracies, I believe that the Aurora may have existed at some point, but I also accept that it may not. The information we’ve been given is sketchy and we’ll probably either only find out the truth in 50 years’ time when the US declassifies this plane, or never find it out at all.
@FirstFish83828 I do admit that the only “design” of the aircraft is a rendering made by an artist that supposedly saw the plane, and no manufacturer has been confirmed for this aircraft (even though Lockheed is the most likely)
+1@FirstFish83828 that is disputed, like the entire question on whether the Aurora was actually a real plane. The US government denies it but of course it could also be them covering up a top-secret project
Meanwhile there are people who swear they’ve seen it with their own eyes; one even said he took a video but didn’t want to release it to “protect the security of the US”
But yeah after what you said I’m now not sure if I should consider this fictional or not, as this project lies in a grey area.
@Mastereldo I’m leaving this approved for now, but I won’t be grading it yet. In the meantime try to build another plane that isn’t controversial. I’m really sorry :(
But seriously, this is a really nice plane
+1HE CAME BACK WITB THE MILK
+1@SPAircraftOfficial ah
+1What’s the leftmost logo?
+1Approved
Nice plane, I’ll judge it when I get home
+1