@OPaiTaOn so that the fuselage slicing tool will be like the xyz positioning tool? (I don’t mind it being this way; being able to type in values is helpful)
@LEEEEEX this looks really good, however because the thumbnail's a screenshot of the builder window, the post looks low-quality and won't catch attention.
Instead,
1. take a screenshot while flying the plane in the game,
2. open the blueprint tool,
3. upload your screenshot into the blueprint, and
4. take a screenshot of the blueprint when submitting the aircraft. Here's a tutorial if you need it.
You said this could handle kamikazes easily, but what if the aircraft kamikaze-ing was a B-1B Lancer with all 70 bombs flying at 700km/h with a pilot motivated enough to want to send the Actias into the ground (cough cough definitely not me)
@Legomaster0418 set the "Maximum horizontal size of image in pixels" to 60 and "Size of each pixel in font units" to 0.5; or else the label won't appear in the game.
And to make your logo not be constrained in a white square, set the colour code for white (#FFFFFF) to transparent
@Legomaster0418 Are you making Continental Airlines Flight 603? If so try to make people be able to recreate the accident, that's what I did with all my accident posts lol
Also note that the real plane's a DC-10-10, which has no center landing gear (I know, it's annoying, but just take out the center landing gear and problem solved!)
Finally, T
@LEEEEEX
- Originality: 9/10 (never heard of this plane, and this is the only XP-68 on the site. The only thing's stopping me is the other XP-54 which was submitted, it may be a coincidence but it still reduces originality)
- Looks: 12/15 (looks good and accurate)
- Performance: 10/15 (pitched up a lot on takeoff. I solved this by adding weight to the front of the plane, and I could then shoot down B-17s with it.)
- Features: 5/5 (gun)
- Overall: 36/45 (sorry I'm late, I was busy posting this, making a post for reaching gold, and building a United Airlines DC-10)
🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿
also @Mastereldo you have only 445 more points to gold, keep it up!
First ever challenge: 46 upvotes, 13 spotlights, 6 submissions, and it's only been 3 days
This has surpassed my expectations to a level I could never have predicted. Thanks for all the support!
@qazedcujmyhn
- Originality: 8/10 (rare design, but there are already a few on SP)
- Looks: 9/15 (it looks good, but the plane looks more like a Boeing 767 than a Boeing 727, which the 7J7 looks more like.)
- Performance: 15/15 (everything works like it should, flight is stable too)
- Features: 5/5 (since it has the propfans)
- Overall: 37/45 (it's a really good airliner, it's just that it's not accurate enough)
@CR929thenewSPplayer
- Originality: 10/10 (plane's very rarely talked about, plus this seems to be the only HS.141 on SimplePlanes)
- Looks: 14/15 (looks exactly like the real one, I really like it!)
- Performance: 11/15 (pitches up a lot when flying, although I figured out that I can fly straight when I turn on the VTOL engines)
- Features: 5/5 (you successfully added in the main feature of the HS.141, VTOL)
- Overall: 40/45 (excellent job, I've saved the aircraft for use in future, if I could upvote this, I would)
HA joke’s on you, I’m underground, it can’t get meeee
+1@OPaiTaOn so that the fuselage slicing tool will be like the xyz positioning tool? (I don’t mind it being this way; being able to type in values is helpful)
+1@ApplePies84 after I finish the Boom Overture
+1Just made a 1-part version of this
+1Update: I have exactly 100 followers now, thank you so much to everyone who's supporting me!
+1The trophy reminds me of an aviation museum; I like it
+1My upvote says it all
+1@o2o isn’t that… today…?
+1oh wait nevermind I just live in a different time zone
Also first... again
+1There, now the thumbnail stands out amongst all the other ones (check "Newest Airplanes" and you'll see what I mean)
+1@LEEEEEX this looks really good, however because the thumbnail's a screenshot of the builder window, the post looks low-quality and won't catch attention.
+1Instead,
1. take a screenshot while flying the plane in the game,
2. open the blueprint tool,
3. upload your screenshot into the blueprint, and
4. take a screenshot of the blueprint when submitting the aircraft.
Here's a tutorial if you need it.
You said this could handle kamikazes easily, but what if the aircraft kamikaze-ing was a B-1B Lancer with all 70 bombs flying at 700km/h with a pilot motivated enough to want to send the Actias into the ground (cough cough definitely not me)
+1@Legomaster0418 set the "Maximum horizontal size of image in pixels" to 60 and "Size of each pixel in font units" to 0.5; or else the label won't appear in the game.
+1And to make your logo not be constrained in a white square, set the colour code for white (#FFFFFF) to transparent
@FirstFish83828 and preferably use Discord to host the images
+1@Legomaster0418 About the decals, you can click on this link. It will help you convert any images of logos into a text label.
+1@Legomaster0418 Are you making Continental Airlines Flight 603? If so try to make people be able to recreate the accident, that's what I did with all my accident posts lol
Also note that the real plane's a DC-10-10, which has no center landing gear (I know, it's annoying, but just take out the center landing gear and problem solved!)
+1Finally, T
@LEEEEEX
+1- Originality:
9/10(never heard of this plane, and this is the only XP-68 on the site. The only thing's stopping me is the other XP-54 which was submitted, it may be a coincidence but it still reduces originality)- Looks:
12/15(looks good and accurate)- Performance:
10/15(pitched up a lot on takeoff. I solved this by adding weight to the front of the plane, and I could then shoot down B-17s with it.)- Features:
5/5(gun)- Overall:
36/45(sorry I'm late, I was busy posting this, making a post for reaching gold, and building a United Airlines DC-10)Approved
I'll take a look at it
+1doesn't look like a fortress to me; it's more like a coffin with 4 engines
+1When most upvoted plane is a tutel
+1@SILVERPANZER to be precise, “Amusement Park 6 Millions™️” (I saw the name)
+1Hi and welcome to SP!
+1I’ll be posting a livery tutorial sometime next week, which may help you @NewToTheSPCommunity
FINALLY, A FUSELAGE WING TUTORIAL
+1Correction: 415 (because i upvoted both moais)
+1🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿
+1also @Mastereldo you have only 445 more points to gold, keep it up!
Nice, I’m working on the United Airlines version of this plane
+1Also T
@AirJMC nice
+1tbh i don't really play TFS anymore, my friend does though
@CooperFilms001 isn't that just a Boeing 707 with a t-tail? lol
+1@CooperFilms001 the -400 didn't have 4 wings, they just changed the engines to propfans (although now that you mention it, a 727 quadjet sounds good)
+1@MOSAstroBoy that would be political
+1Approved
another person posted a very similar plane (the XP-54) 2 days ago
+1Salmon sushi is my favourite
+1Big Brother is watching you!
Also T
+1æ on the tail
+1Rip 🪦
+1@TheSonOfThunder thank you so much!
+1@TheSonOfThunder even though not many planes were produced, it still got beyond the prototype stage, so it can’t qualify, sorry
+1That’s one huge nose
+1First ever challenge: 46 upvotes, 13 spotlights, 6 submissions, and it's only been 3 days
+1This has surpassed my expectations to a level I could never have predicted. Thanks for all the support!
@qazedcujmyhn
+1- Originality:
8/10(rare design, but there are already a few on SP)- Looks:
9/15(it looks good, but the plane looks more like a Boeing 767 than a Boeing 727, which the 7J7 looks more like.)- Performance:
15/15(everything works like it should, flight is stable too)- Features:
5/5(since it has the propfans)- Overall:
37/45(it's a really good airliner, it's just that it's not accurate enough)@CR929thenewSPplayer
+1- Originality:
10/10(plane's very rarely talked about, plus this seems to be the only HS.141 on SimplePlanes)- Looks:
14/15(looks exactly like the real one, I really like it!)- Performance:
11/15(pitches up a lot when flying, although I figured out that I can fly straight when I turn on the VTOL engines)- Features:
5/5(you successfully added in the main feature of the HS.141, VTOL)- Overall:
40/45(excellent job, I've saved the aircraft for use in future, if I could upvote this, I would)When FedEx is FedUp with you
+1@HololiveFan2009 it’s 226 upvotes now
+1(my bad)
@Jackflysplane001 the manufacturer operates its own cargo airline i think
+1@FirstFish83828 i'm afraid that's classified
+1@FirstFish83828 bye
+1Classified photograph of the crash of one of the 2 SR-91-A1 prototypes, RAF Boscombe Down, Wiltshire 26 September 1994
+1@Mastereldo one comment on the plane: the fuselage looks much better when I use fuselage smoothing
+1@Bryan5 wait there are variants???
+1(to any mods) is this considered a political debate? If it is I’m sorry
+1