I like the flight model. The TGP is also quite nice. (Btw, do you mind if I nab the FT for that? It seems way more reliable than the one I use.)
.
The wing flex seems a bit exaggerated, so make sure you clamp it. It also looks a little unnatural since the wings move so slowly; try changing the rotator speed to 100%.
.
I'd also make the slats go down a bit more.
.
The slats and wing flex spaz out very slightly when stationary, try disabling them when below a certain speed.
.
Overall, It's pretty cool for an early access. Now I wanna remake my Viper...
@ZeroWithSlashedO @DeveloperKorzalerke I believe the F-16 does have auto flaps for gear, but a manual override wouldn't be a bad idea.
.
Also, "Do no HARM."
- The Hippocratic Oath
@ZeroWithSlashedO I feel like its 50/50. Personally, I like the F, but that's only because that's the one I grew up seeing more of. COUGH COUGH BATTLEFIELD 3 COUGH COUGH
@Krikkit42 The engine power is correct and the drag points is already quite low.
It should take a while to get to mach because the hornet isn't the best in terms of energy addition.
I'll take a look though.
I say Su-27.
You already have some experience making Flankers and performance-wise, I think it'll do well in the competition. 4 short-range AAM's and 6 SARH missiles with good maneuverability to boot is nothing to scoff at.
can confirm
I think it has to do with the mod itself since the Join button straight up doesn't work
I also get an error when I try to connect using the console edit: it's prolly the server
just don't cover the plane with wings like a fuselage...
To be fair, wing paneling has been around since pretty early on. Look at SpiritusRaptor's first builds for example. And the first trailer for SP shows the technique being used.
@Tsuchiisan What's funny is that this sort of already happens. SP missiles do have proxy detonation, but rarely use it. The damage is like the WW2 flak though (not great).
@GreatWizard Reticulated pythons are dope asf. I've seen an albino one in real life, they have a yellow and white pattern.
+2Sekiro?
+1A-IV MirageHawk?
+1For people that thought NATO reporting names were sus.
+1Yeah...
The nose section is such an odd shape to make, especially before fuselage cutting, but it looks like you nailed it!
+2I feel like newer devices wouldn't lag that much. I don't see why not.
+3@SnoWFLakE0s It's great if you want to have PTSD from looking at a pringle.
+1hyperbolic parabaloidI like the flight model. The TGP is also quite nice. (Btw, do you mind if I nab the FT for that? It seems way more reliable than the one I use.)
+5.
The wing flex seems a bit exaggerated, so make sure you clamp it. It also looks a little unnatural since the wings move so slowly; try changing the rotator speed to 100%.
.
I'd also make the slats go down a bit more.
.
The slats and wing flex spaz out very slightly when stationary, try disabling them when below a certain speed.
.
Overall, It's pretty cool for an early access. Now I wanna remake my Viper...
@ZeroWithSlashedO @DeveloperKorzalerke I believe the F-16 does have auto flaps for gear, but a manual override wouldn't be a bad idea.
+3.
Also, "Do no HARM."
- The Hippocratic Oath
Square windows on a jet airliner?
+2I got a bad feeling about this...
Beasthunter,
+5Rickrolling will always be cool.
Unless it isn't.
Hope that helps.
Looking good! Invasion stripes make everything better.
+2@ZeroWithSlashedO I feel like its 50/50. Personally, I like the F, but that's only because that's the one I grew up seeing more of. COUGH COUGH BATTLEFIELD 3 COUGH COUGH
+3Femur breaker vibe
+11@ZeroWithSlashedO Hope you found the inlet technique useful :)
@Krikkit42 The engine power is correct and the drag points is already quite low.
+1It should take a while to get to mach because the hornet isn't the best in terms of energy addition.
I'll take a look though.
👇 Please use your jeTsTream. 👇
+1@BeastHunter
@Karmen
@Spitfirelad05
@xYoshii_
@donkski
@Bryan5
+1@NewWorldAerospace
@SELWYN101
@KDnotSpy
@xNotDumb
@SCPCalebkid
@DeveloperKorzalerke
+1@AlmostADev
@Aviator01
The only good kind of spam is the spam in a can.
+13 may be a little strict, but waiting a day is not asking much.
I say Su-27.
You already have some experience making Flankers and performance-wise, I think it'll do well in the competition. 4 short-range AAM's and 6 SARH missiles with good maneuverability to boot is nothing to scoff at.
bendy bus (tm)
y stil servr brokn?!
+1@EternalDarkness Jeremy Clarkson's PBR?
can confirm
I think it has to do with the mod itself since the Join button straight up doesn't work
I also get an error when I try to connect using the console
edit: it's prolly the server
Yes, but what effect will this have in tomorrow's F1 race?
+4jk, wish you guys well.
one of these is not like the other
+1So this is the Boston Paul Defiant's final form?
+2This also happens sometimes on PC. It's very inconsistent, but it does happen after blowing up another plane or a big lag spike in MP.
huge boats
+1(with guns)
(gunboats)
@TRD6932 Delta = one less pair of wings = less parts :)
+2simp leplanes
+2@Zippy6 man that sounds painful. If it helps, windows has an on screen keyboard you can use.
+1Can you flood one side of the ship to increase the firing range?
+4Wait, you typed A 13 times...
+2someone should make an accurate XF-84 using this
+2JeTsTream
Yessss
+4Besiege does this automatically and it helped a ton.
Not sure what kind of spaghetti code it would need though.
To be fair, wing paneling has been around since pretty early on. Look at SpiritusRaptor's first builds for example. And the first trailer for SP shows the technique being used.
+5Can't wait to go 600 kts and do a vertical in a hot air balloon
+2shake n bake
+2S u b a s s e m b l i e s
+1W i d e B o i
+1hears music
+3Ah yes, a man of culture
@Dathcha euro delta supremacy reeeeeee
@Tsuchiisan What's funny is that this sort of already happens. SP missiles do have proxy detonation, but rarely use it. The damage is like the WW2 flak though (not great).
+2Boeing 787 except it's all wing flex
+1🗿